On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Matthew Seaman
m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk wrote:
On 02/12/2012 09:32, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
If you're running 2.9 OPTIONSng should be handled correctly. It
doesn't matter much: the exact format of the OPTIONS variables
doesn't make much difference to
On 07/12/2012 11:09, Kimmo Paasiala wrote:
With the latest 3.0 version of p5-FreeBSD-PortIndex I get an error at
the end of portindex run:
Accumulating dependency information:
On 02/12/2012 06:50, Kimmo Paasiala wrote:
It takes about half an hour on my dog slow intel atom D510. Is there
anything in the works to speed up 'make index'? I understand that the
slowest part is the evaluation of dependencies, is that right?
The slow part is parsing around 25,000 Makefiles
On Sun, 2 Dec 2012 08:50:18 +0200
Kimmo Paasiala kpaas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 8:36 AM, Kevin Oberman kob6...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 7:32 PM, Eitan Adler li...@eitanadler.com
wrote:
On 1 December 2012 11:46, Miroslav Lachman 000.f...@quip.cz
wrote:
On Sun, 02 Dec 2012 08:12:45 +
Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk wrote:
On 02/12/2012 06:50, Kimmo Paasiala wrote:
It takes about half an hour on my dog slow intel atom D510. Is there
anything in the works to speed up 'make index'? I understand that
the slowest part is the
On 02/12/2012 08:22, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
You might want to try ports-mgmt/p5-FreeBSD-Portindex
cache-init(1) will take that half an hour, but after that updating the
INDEX will take a minute or so (depending on what has changed in the PT
since your last update). Also you'll have an INDEX
On 02/12/2012 08:26, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
BTW, I'm seeing this on my machines:
Checking timestamps on options makefiles: cache-update: WARNING unknown
options file /var/db/ports/rsync/options -- ignored
cache-update: WARNING unknown options file /var/db/ports/subversion/options
-- ignored
On Sun, 02 Dec 2012 08:49:51 +
Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk wrote:
On 02/12/2012 08:22, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
You might want to try ports-mgmt/p5-FreeBSD-Portindex
cache-init(1) will take that half an hour, but after that updating
the INDEX will take a minute or so
On Sun, 02 Dec 2012 09:16:20 +
Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk wrote:
On 02/12/2012 08:26, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
BTW, I'm seeing this on my machines:
Checking timestamps on options makefiles: cache-update: WARNING
unknown options file /var/db/ports/rsync/options --
On 02/12/2012 09:32, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
If you're running 2.9 OPTIONSng should be handled correctly. It
doesn't matter much: the exact format of the OPTIONS variables
doesn't make much difference to building the INDEX, only detecting
when they've been changed.
# pkg info
On 2 December 2012 01:36, Kevin Oberman kob6...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 7:32 PM, Eitan Adler li...@eitanadler.com wrote:
On 1 December 2012 11:46, Miroslav Lachman 000.f...@quip.cz wrote:
Hi,
I don't know the details about infrastructure, but I found out that web is
showing
Hi,
I don't know the details about infrastructure, but I found out that web
is showing lighttpd-1.4.31_5 [1] and svn ports tree has 1.4.32 for a 10
days [2]
Is it aftermath of the intrusion to the FreeBSD.org cluster?
[1] http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/ports.cgi?query=^lighttpd-1
[2]
On 1 December 2012 11:46, Miroslav Lachman 000.f...@quip.cz wrote:
Hi,
I don't know the details about infrastructure, but I found out that web is
showing lighttpd-1.4.31_5 [1] and svn ports tree has 1.4.32 for a 10 days
[2]
Is it aftermath of the intrusion to the FreeBSD.org cluster?
I'll
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 7:32 PM, Eitan Adler li...@eitanadler.com wrote:
On 1 December 2012 11:46, Miroslav Lachman 000.f...@quip.cz wrote:
Hi,
I don't know the details about infrastructure, but I found out that web is
showing lighttpd-1.4.31_5 [1] and svn ports tree has 1.4.32 for a 10 days
14 matches
Mail list logo
