On Sunday 24 May 2009 00:16:37 Maho NAKATA wrote:
Hi I tested it yesterday,
1.
I need
MAKE_JOBS_SAFE=yes
in the Makefile.
Yes, you would need that. I believe that will be default.
2. with above patch, ooo2 doesn't launch parallele jobs.
I spotted that problem after
On Sun, 24 May 2009 10:26:23 +0200
David Naylor naylor.b.da...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday 24 May 2009 00:16:37 Maho NAKATA wrote:
Hi I tested it yesterday,
1.
I need
MAKE_JOBS_SAFE=yes
in the Makefile.
Yes, you would need that. I believe that will be default.
Ion-Mihai Tetcu píše v so 23. 05. 2009 v 13:51 +0300:
- MAKE_JOBS_NUMBER defaults (but user defined) to number of cores
This part looks OK, I wonder if there's any reason t ain't like this
now; Pav?
-.if defined(MAKE_JOBS_NUMBER)
+MAKE_JOBS_NUMBER?= `${SYSCTL} -n kern.smp.cpus`
Dmitry Marakasov píše v pá 22. 05. 2009 v 18:31 +0400:
* Pav Lucistnik (p...@freebsd.org) wrote:
we finally decided that enough users migrated to recent enough FreeBSD
versions that we can finally suggest that maintainers can start using
bsd.port.options.mk file in their ports.
The
On Sun, 24 May 2009 02:18:05 +0100
RW rwmailli...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sat, 23 May 2009 20:22:03 -0400
Robert Huff roberth...@rcn.com wrote:
Marcin Rzepecki writes:
But why won't port do this automatically? Is there a way to force
it before installing updated port version?
Problems on portupgrade
Does anyone know how to resolve this one(Please also see also note below):
Thanks in advance for any help
David
# Portupgrade -a
:
:
- x11-drivers/xf86-video-via (marked as IGNORE)
:
:
:
--- Skipping 'x11/xorg' (xorg-7.4_1) because a requisite
package
Dmitry Marakasov píše v ne 24. 05. 2009 v 19:33 +0400:
* Pav Lucistnik (p...@freebsd.org) wrote:
Perhaps we can also start to deprecate WANT_*?
Looks a bit radical to me. Or is there a good reason to do so?
I meant slow transition from WANT_, like we do with
On Sun, 2009-05-24 at 08:47 -0700, David Southwell wrote:
Problems on portupgrade
Does anyone know how to resolve this one(Please also see also note below):
Thanks in advance for any help
Uninstall them... They are no longer supported and will be removed at
some point. You may also want
On Sun, 24 May 2009 16:10:23 +0200
Pav Lucistnik p...@freebsd.org wrote:
Ion-Mihai Tetcu píše v so 23. 05. 2009 v 13:51 +0300:
- MAKE_JOBS_NUMBER defaults (but user defined) to number of
cores
This part looks OK, I wonder if there's any reason t ain't like this
now; Pav?
-.if
Ion-Mihai Tetcu píše v ne 24. 05. 2009 v 19:01 +0300:
On Sun, 24 May 2009 16:10:23 +0200
Pav Lucistnik p...@freebsd.org wrote:
Ion-Mihai Tetcu píše v so 23. 05. 2009 v 13:51 +0300:
- MAKE_JOBS_NUMBER defaults (but user defined) to number of
cores
This part looks OK, I
On Sunday 24 May 2009 08:49:10 Robert Noland wrote:
On Sun, 2009-05-24 at 08:47 -0700, David Southwell wrote:
Problems on portupgrade
Does anyone know how to resolve this one(Please also see also note
below):
Thanks in advance for any help
Thanks Robert however...
Uninstall them...
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 07:59:57PM +0200, Martin Wilke wrote:
We rolled a new version with a fix for all users where
has problems with kernel load and unload. Many thanks to
Shin-ichi Okano where submitted this patch to the vbox ml.
http://people.freebsd.org/~miwi/vbox/virtualbox_4.tgz
On søn, mai 24, 2009 at 07:02:37pm +0200, Ulf Lilleengen wrote:
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 07:59:57PM +0200, Martin Wilke wrote:
We rolled a new version with a fix for all users where
has problems with kernel load and unload. Many thanks to
Shin-ichi Okano where submitted this patch to the
On Sun, 24 May 2009 10:49:10 -0500
Robert Noland rnol...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Sun, 2009-05-24 at 08:47 -0700, David Southwell wrote:
Problems on portupgrade
Does anyone know how to resolve this one(Please also see also note
below):
Thanks in advance for any help
Uninstall them... They
On Sun, May 24, 2009 7:04 pm, Ulf Lilleengen wrote:
On søn, mai 24, 2009 at 07:02:37pm +0200, Ulf Lilleengen wrote:
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 07:59:57PM +0200, Martin Wilke wrote:
We rolled a new version with a fix for all users where
has problems with kernel load and unload. Many thanks to
On Sunday 24 May 2009 18:27:57 Pav Lucistnik wrote:
Ion-Mihai Tetcu píše v ne 24. 05. 2009 v 19:01 +0300:
On Sun, 24 May 2009 16:10:23 +0200
Pav Lucistnik p...@freebsd.org wrote:
Ion-Mihai Tetcu píše v so 23. 05. 2009 v 13:51 +0300:
- MAKE_JOBS_NUMBER defaults (but user defined) to
I have no clue as to what is causing this, but this is probably the
reason why people use the tinderbox or roll their own system to build
consistent packages.
I feel like I am though? I have a dedicated box just for building
packages. make package creates a tbz file of all packages, and is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 07:02:38PM +0200, Ulf Lilleengen wrote:
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 07:59:57PM +0200, Martin Wilke wrote:
We rolled a new version with a fix for all users where
has problems with kernel load and unload. Many thanks to
On søn, mai 24, 2009 at 08:18:20pm +0200, Martin Wilke wrote:
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 07:02:38PM +0200, Ulf Lilleengen wrote:
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 07:59:57PM +0200, Martin Wilke wrote:
We rolled a new version with a fix for all users where
has problems with kernel load and unload.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
As follows, with either portmaster or portupgrade:
/bin/sh ../libtool --silent --tag=CC --mode=compile cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H
- -I../include/sane -I. -I/usr/local/include -I. -I. -I../include
- -I../include -DLIBDIR=/usr/local/lib/sane
On Sun, 24.05.2009 at 14:11:26 -0400, Matt Juszczak wrote:
I have no clue as to what is causing this, but this is probably the
reason why people use the tinderbox or roll their own system to build
consistent packages.
I feel like I am though? I have a dedicated box just for building
It should be under the following circumstances:
- You don't update /usr/ports
I haven't.
- You don't change /etc/make.conf
I haven't.
- You don't deinstall packages
I haven't. =)
The bug I'm describing would make sense if SOMETHING changed. But I
haven't changed a thing.
On Sun, 24 May 2009 10:26:23 +0200
David Naylor naylor.b.da...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday 24 May 2009 00:16:37 Maho NAKATA wrote:
Hi I tested it yesterday,
1.
I need
MAKE_JOBS_SAFE=yes
in the Makefile.
Yes, you would need that. I believe that will be default.
2009/5/24 Norikatsu Shigemura n...@freebsd.org:
Hi Martin.
On Fri, 22 May 2009 19:59:57 +0200
Martin Wilke m...@freebsd.org wrote:
We rolled a new version with a fix for all users where
has problems with kernel load and unload. Many thanks to
Shin-ichi Okano where submitted this patch to
On 25/05/2009, at 4:59 AM, Michael Butler wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
As follows, with either portmaster or portupgrade:
/bin/sh ../libtool --silent --tag=CC --mode=compile cc -
DHAVE_CONFIG_H
- -I../include/sane -I. -I/usr/local/include -I. -I. -I../include
-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tom Mende wrote:
On 25/05/2009, at 4:59 AM, Michael Butler wrote:
As follows, with either portmaster or portupgrade:
/bin/sh ../libtool --silent --tag=CC --mode=compile cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H
-I../include/sane -I. -I/usr/local/include -I. -I.
On 25/05/2009, at 11:50 AM, Michael Butler wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tom Mende wrote:
On 25/05/2009, at 4:59 AM, Michael Butler wrote:
As follows, with either portmaster or portupgrade:
/bin/sh ../libtool --silent --tag=CC --mode=compile cc -
DHAVE_CONFIG_H
27 matches
Mail list logo
