Re: FreeBSD ports which are currently marked broken

2011-01-11 Thread Lars Engels
On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 11:34:05AM +, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 08:29:10AM +0100, lini...@freebsd.org wrote: > > > > portname: math/dislin > > broken because: size mismatch > > build errors: none. > > overview: > > http://portsmon.FreeBS

[HEADS UP] Ports feature freeze to come into effect

2011-01-11 Thread Thomas Abthorpe
With this commit, http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/217255, the RC2 phase is under way. Normal upgrade, new ports, and changes that only affect other branches will be allowed without prior approval but with the extra Feature safe: yes tag in the commit message. Any commit that is sweeping, i.

sysutils/gpkgdep mainteinership

2011-01-11 Thread Mikhail Tsatsenko
Hello All! I'd like to take mainteinership of sysutils/gpkgdep since old maintainer had been reset. -- Mikhail T. mich...@fun-box.ru ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe,

Re: sysutils/gpkgdep mainteinership

2011-01-11 Thread Erwin Lansing
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 06:01:36PM +0300, Mikhail Tsatsenko wrote: > Hello All! Hi Mikhail! > > I'd like to take mainteinership of sysutils/gpkgdep since old maintainer > had been reset. > Thank you for volunteering, the port is now yours. Thanks, -erwin -- Erwin Lansing

Removal of libtool-2.4 in favor of libtool-2.2, why?

2011-01-11 Thread Andrew W. Nosenko
At the time of "collapsing" of the two ports (devel/libtool22 and devel/libtool24) into single one (devel/libtool) the "survived" occur libtool-2.2 (formely devel/libtool22). Why? I'm very confused, especially considering that libtool-2.2 is not fully compatible with autoconf-2.68 and one of the

Re: Removal of libtool-2.4 in favor of libtool-2.2, why?

2011-01-11 Thread Ade Lovett
On Jan 11, 2011, at 16:21 , Andrew W. Nosenko wrote: > Can I ask autotool's maintainer(s) (sorry, it hard to determine > human's name from autotools@ alias) to upgrade devel/libtool from > libtool-2.2 to libtool-2.4 and, as consequence and for completeness, > libltdl-2.2 to libtool-2.4? 1. devel