something wrong with LICENSEs

2011-09-20 Thread Sergey V. Dyatko
Hi, CCd eadler@ as he did last commit. When I'm trying update x11/xbitmaps x11/xtrans and other xorg-related(?) ports I got: ===> License not correctly defined: for unknown licenses, defining LICENSE_PERMS is mandatory (otherwise use a known LICENSE) with DISABLE_LICENSES all works fine, sur

Re: something wrong with LICENSEs

2011-09-20 Thread Ruslan Mahmatkhanov
Sergey V. Dyatko wrote on 20.09.2011 11:06: Hi, CCd eadler@ as he did last commit. When I'm trying update x11/xbitmaps x11/xtrans and other xorg-related(?) ports I got: ===> License not correctly defined: for unknown licenses, defining LICENSE_PERMS is mandatory (otherwise use a known LICEN

Re: something wrong with LICENSEs

2011-09-20 Thread Sergey V. Dyatko
On Tue, 20 Sep 2011 11:42:17 +0400 Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote: > Sergey V. Dyatko wrote on 20.09.2011 11:06: > > Hi, > > > > CCd eadler@ as he did last commit. > > > > When I'm trying update x11/xbitmaps x11/xtrans and other > > xorg-related(?) ports I got: > > > > ===> License not correctly de

Re: something wrong with LICENSEs

2011-09-20 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 11:13:38AM +0300, Sergey V. Dyatko wrote: > On Tue, 20 Sep 2011 11:42:17 +0400 > Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote: > > > Sergey V. Dyatko wrote on 20.09.2011 11:06: > > > Hi, > > > > > > CCd eadler@ as he did last commit. > > > > > > When I'm trying update x11/xbitmaps x11/xtrans

Re: Circular dependency in devel/doxygen?

2011-09-20 Thread
> Hey everyone, I maintain devel/doxygen (sorry I didn't add my 2 cents > earlier, I've been a bit busy) and was looking at this particular thread. I > know someone filed a PR regarding the circular dependency, stating that it > might be best to split apart doxygen so one port builds just the prog

problem with port x11/xbitmaps in Current and 7.4 stable.

2011-09-20 Thread Edwin L. Culp W.
Checked UPDATING and there isn't any mention. I get: x11/xbitmaps # make ===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found ===> License not correctly defined: for unknown licenses, defining LICENSE_PERMS is mandatory (otherwise use a known LICENSE) *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11/x

Re: problem with port x11/xbitmaps in Current and 7.4 stable.

2011-09-20 Thread Chris Rees
On 20 Sep 2011 13:10, "Edwin L. Culp W." wrote: > > Checked UPDATING and there isn't any mention. I get: > > x11/xbitmaps # make > ===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found > ===> License not correctly defined: for unknown licenses, defining > LICENSE_PERMS is mandatory (otherwise u

Re: something wrong with LICENSEs

2011-09-20 Thread Sahil Tandon
On Sep 20, 2011, at 4:23 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 11:13:38AM +0300, Sergey V. Dyatko wrote: >> On Tue, 20 Sep 2011 11:42:17 +0400 >> Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote: >> >>> Sergey V. Dyatko wrote on 20.09.2011 11:06: Hi, CCd eadler@ as he did last commit

Re: something wrong with LICENSEs

2011-09-20 Thread Ruslan Mahmatkhanov
Sahil Tandon wrote on 20.09.2011 16:41: On Sep 20, 2011, at 4:23 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 11:13:38AM +0300, Sergey V. Dyatko wrote: On Tue, 20 Sep 2011 11:42:17 +0400 Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote: Sergey V. Dyatko wrote on 20.09.2011 11:06: Hi, CCd eadler@ as he

Re: problem with port x11/xbitmaps in Current and 7.4 stable.

2011-09-20 Thread Edwin L. Culp W.
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 7:13 AM, Chris Rees wrote: > > On 20 Sep 2011 13:10, "Edwin L. Culp W." wrote: >> >> Checked UPDATING and there isn't any mention.  I get: >> >> x11/xbitmaps # make >> ===>  Vulnerability check disabled, database not found >> ===>  License not correctly defined: for unknow

FreeBSD unmaintained ports which are currently marked broken

2011-09-20 Thread linimon
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically notify users of ports that are marked as "broken" in their Makefiles. In many cases these ports are failing to compile on some subset of the FreeBSD build environments. The most common probl

FreeBSD ports which are currently marked broken

2011-09-20 Thread linimon
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically notify users of ports that are marked as "broken" in their Makefiles. In many cases these ports are failing to compile on some subset of the FreeBSD build environments. The most common probl

FreeBSD unmaintained ports which are currently scheduled for deletion

2011-09-20 Thread linimon
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically schedule removal of ports that have been judged to have outlived their usefulness. Often, this is due to a better alternative having become available and/or the cessation of development on th

FreeBSD unmaintained ports which are currently marked forbidden

2011-09-20 Thread linimon
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically notify users about ports that are marked as "forbidden" in their Makefiles. Often, these ports are so marked due to security concerns, such as known exploits. An overview of each port, inclu

FreeBSD ports which are currently marked forbidden

2011-09-20 Thread linimon
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically notify users about ports that are marked as "forbidden" in their Makefiles. Often, these ports are so marked due to security concerns, such as known exploits. An overview of each port, inclu