Hello!
Need help in the testing native program of Cinelerra.
http://svn.bluelife.at/index.cgi/blueports/browse/multimedia/cinelerra-devel/
Thanks!
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To
Dear port maintainers,
The following list includes ports maintained by you that have duplicate
LATEST_LINK values. They should either be modified to use a unique
LATEST_LINK or suppressed using NO_LATEST_LINK, to avoid overwriting
each other in the packages/Latest directory. If your ports
Doug Barton:
On 11/16/2011 05:03, Wietse Venema wrote:
I tend to believe that network-less build environments are not
representative for the environment where an Internet MTA would run,
but hey, what do I know.
I think you're right that having a network makes the MTA more useful. :)
Jase Thew:
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ]
On 16/11/2011 23:30, Sahil Tandon wrote:
On Wed, 2011-11-16 at 13:16:34 -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
[SNIP]
It would be immensely helpful if run-time details could be made
available including line of source code, and any system
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 08:54:02 -0500 (EST)
Wietse Venema articulated:
Sloppy programmers should never be rewarded.
I couldn't agree more fully. Unfortunately, they all too often are.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To
I have been hearing that since last night DNS 0-day exploitation is taking
place all over the net.
ISC mentions recursion. Is this vulnerability only on DNS that allows
recursive queries? (if so mine
is safe thankfully). Is there a patch to the BSD flavor of BIND expected to
address this?
On 17 Nov 2011 13:38, Erwin Lansing er...@freebsd.org wrote:
Dear port maintainers,
The following list includes ports maintained by you that have duplicate
LATEST_LINK values. They should either be modified to use a unique
LATEST_LINK or suppressed using NO_LATEST_LINK, to avoid overwriting
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 12:04:47PM -0500, Jerry wrote:
I understand that there seems to be some reluctance to updating the
shells/bash port until after the release of FreeBSD-9.0 at some
future date. I am not sure I understand the reasoning behind this
logic. If there is a problem with the
Wietse Venema:
Jase Thew:
It can occur when IPv6 is enabled, but you don't have any IPv6 addresses
configured on any interfaces. (Yes, having an IPv6 enabled interface
with no addresses assigned is non-RFC3513 compliant, but it can and does
occur).
...
Thanks, this is very helpful.
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 09:41:22 -0800
David O'Brien articulated:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 12:04:47PM -0500, Jerry wrote:
I understand that there seems to be some reluctance to updating the
shells/bash port until after the release of FreeBSD-9.0 at some
future date. I am not sure I understand
В Thu, 17 Nov 2011 10:33:47 +0200
Ivan Klymenko fi...@ukr.net пишет:
Hello!
Need help in the testing native program of Cinelerra.
http://svn.bluelife.at/index.cgi/blueports/browse/multimedia/cinelerra-devel/
Thanks!
If someone have problems with access to the svn
Here's the archive port
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 01:23:49PM -0500, Jerry wrote:
Ports are being updated everyday. I am assuming that they will be
included on the 9.0-RELEASE DVD. Personally, I never use the CD/DVD for
installation for other than the very basic system anyway. I prefer using
the FTP method to download
At $WORK, we have recently been reminded that xterm doesn't cope all
that well with being invoked in an environment that returns ENOENT on
xterm's attempt to open /dev/tty (in main.c).
(The environment in question is a jailed 32-bit FreeBSD running on a
FreeBSD/amd64 host. Developers need to
Wietse Venema píše v čt 17. 11. 2011 v 13:23 -0500:
Wietse Venema:
Jase Thew:
It can occur when IPv6 is enabled, but you don't have any IPv6 addresses
configured on any interfaces. (Yes, having an IPv6 enabled interface
with no addresses assigned is non-RFC3513 compliant, but it can
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 11/17/2011 08:31, Albert Thiel wrote:
I have been hearing that since last night DNS 0-day exploitation is
taking place all over the net.
I dislike the term 0-day because it means different things to
different people. What is true is that a
Pav Lucistnik p...@freebsd.org wrote:
The build jails are configured to have only IPv4 address on lo0,
but the host have both IPv4 and IPv6 configured on its lo0.
Even disregarding RFC3513, is an IPv6-enabled kernel without an IPv6
address on lo0 a realistic configuration for a real FreeBSD
16 matches
Mail list logo
