I get this while running portmaster on a most recently updated ports
tree:
make: Unknown modifier ')'
make: /usr/ports/mail/alpine/Makefile line 108: Malformed conditional
(${PORT_OPTIONS:MQUOTA) || defined(WITH_MAILDIR})
make: Fatal errors encountered -- cannot continue=== Launching child
to
On 6/7/2013 08:53, O. Hartmann wrote:
I get this while running portmaster on a most recently updated ports
tree:
make: Unknown modifier ')'
make: /usr/ports/mail/alpine/Makefile line 108: Malformed conditional
(${PORT_OPTIONS:MQUOTA) || defined(WITH_MAILDIR})
make: Fatal errors encountered --
On Thu, 6 Jun 2013 18:43:08 +0100, Chris Rees wrote
Hi,
That's the proper fix- sorry I was unclear there; I meant if
it can't be fixed easily.
I have just updated the PR with a fix, see :
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/177949
Anton, can you test it and tell me how it goes
On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 08:57:01AM +0200, John Marino wrote:
On 6/7/2013 08:53, O. Hartmann wrote:
I get this while running portmaster on a most recently updated ports
tree:
make: Unknown modifier ')'
make: /usr/ports/mail/alpine/Makefile line 108: Malformed conditional
Hi,
I have committed the code preventing config-conditional to popup the dialog only
if some global options are defined (NLS, DOCS, EXAMPLES and IPV6 for now).
This was a popular demand, hope that it fits the requirement.
So from now please always define via OPTIONS_DEFINE those options if your
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in
the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically notify users of ports
that are marked as broken in their Makefiles. In many cases
these ports are failing to compile on some subset of the FreeBSD
build environments. The most common
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in
the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically notify users of ports
that are marked as broken in their Makefiles. In many cases
these ports are failing to compile on some subset of the FreeBSD
build environments. The most common
I have just updated the PR with a fix, see :
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/177949
Anton, can you test it and tell me how it goes ?
works fine on ia64
Thanks
Anton
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
El día Sunday, May 26, 2013 a las 05:50:22PM +0200, Matthias Apitz escribió:
Hello,
Today morning, after SVN checkout /usr/ports r319094 and wiping out
all old stuff:
# rm -rf /usr/local/*
# rm -rf /var/db/pkg/*
# rm -rf /compat/linux/*
I've made the following ports:
x11/xorg
On Fri, 7 Jun 2013 09:52:44 +0100 (BST), Anton Shterenlikht wrote
Anton, can you test it and tell me how it goes ?
works fine on ia64
Thanks.
I'll wait for Edwin approval and commit the update.
Best regards,
--
Ganael LAPLANCHE ganael.laplan...@martymac.org
http://www.martymac.org |
Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
I have committed the code preventing config-conditional to popup the dialog
only
if some global options are defined (NLS, DOCS, EXAMPLES and IPV6 for now).
This was a popular demand, hope that it fits the requirement.
So from now please always define via
On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 12:20:24PM +0300, Vitaly Magerya wrote:
Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
I have committed the code preventing config-conditional to popup the dialog
only
if some global options are defined (NLS, DOCS, EXAMPLES and IPV6 for now).
This was a popular demand, hope that it
On 7 Jun 2013 10:16, Ganael LAPLANCHE ganael.laplan...@martymac.org
wrote:
On Fri, 7 Jun 2013 09:52:44 +0100 (BST), Anton Shterenlikht wrote
Anton, can you test it and tell me how it goes ?
works fine on ia64
Thanks.
I'll wait for Edwin approval and commit the update.
I think
On Fri, 7 Jun 2013 10:48:32 +0100, Chris Rees wrote
I think maintainer timeout applies here; unless there was an
acknowledgement from the maintainer before we shouldn't make
people wait any longer.
You're right, this PR is quite old now (6 weeks). I've committed the change.
Thanks !
--
Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
Is it possible to still show the dialog if one of those options implies
additional dependencies?
If not, what should those of us who do not want them installed do?
make config will always show those options so you can always tune them.
just make
On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 01:15:49PM +0300, Vitaly Magerya wrote:
Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
Is it possible to still show the dialog if one of those options implies
additional dependencies?
If not, what should those of us who do not want them installed do?
make config will always show
Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
So, again, what are my options if I don't want dependencies to be pulled
in silently?
You have no options and you never had one in the ports tree sorry.
Previously maintainers could decide to show dialog with only DOCS or not
to show it.
They didn't do it
On 2013-06-07 12:17, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 01:15:49PM +0300, Vitaly Magerya wrote:
Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
Is it possible to still show the dialog if one of those options implies
additional dependencies?
If not, what should those of us who do not want them
On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 12:46:08PM +0200, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
On 2013-06-07 12:17, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 01:15:49PM +0300, Vitaly Magerya wrote:
Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
Is it possible to still show the dialog if one of those options implies
additional
Hi,
I'm out of town at the moment but I'll take a look at this sometime next
week. If you want please submit a PR for this as well.
--
Cheers,
Cy Schubert cy.schub...@komquats.com
FreeBSD UNIX: c...@freebsd.org Web: http://www.FreeBSD.org
In message 20130607085730.ga8...@sh4-5.1blu.de,
On 2013-06-07 13:40, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 12:46:08PM +0200, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
On 2013-06-07 12:17, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 01:15:49PM +0300, Vitaly Magerya wrote:
Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
Is it possible to still show the dialog if
Le 07/06/2013 15:30, Tijl Coosemans a écrit :
On 2013-06-07 13:40, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 12:46:08PM +0200, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
On 2013-06-07 12:17, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 01:15:49PM +0300, Vitaly Magerya wrote:
Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 03:30:15PM +0200, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
On 2013-06-07 13:40, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 12:46:08PM +0200, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
On 2013-06-07 12:17, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 01:15:49PM +0300, Vitaly Magerya wrote:
On Fri, 7 Jun 2013 15:42:44 +0200
Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 03:30:15PM +0200, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
On 2013-06-07 13:40, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 12:46:08PM +0200, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
On 2013-06-07 12:17, Baptiste
On 7 Jun 2013 17:57, Michael Gmelin free...@grem.de wrote:
On Fri, 7 Jun 2013 15:42:44 +0200
Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 03:30:15PM +0200, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
On 2013-06-07 13:40, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 12:46:08PM
On Fri, 7 Jun 2013 18:15:16 +0100
Chris Rees utis...@gmail.com wrote:
On 7 Jun 2013 17:57, Michael Gmelin free...@grem.de wrote:
On Fri, 7 Jun 2013 15:42:44 +0200
Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 03:30:15PM +0200, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
On
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 8:15 PM, Chris Rees utis...@gmail.com wrote:
I can see your point when talking about DOCS, but for NLS it's insanity
*for general use*. Give me an example of where NLS non-globals are
appropriate and I'll shut up.
The GIMP in Russian locale.
GNU Make in any non-English
On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 08:45:10AM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
The compatibility code to parse the WITH/WITHOUT entries in make.conf
will be removed in 6 months either.
Do not forget to convert your configuration (make.conf, portsconf etc).
A reminder will be send a month before the
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 8:23 PM, Michael Gmelin free...@grem.de wrote:
I was mostly talking about DOCS, I (poorly) chose NLS as an additional
example to show how multiple groups could work. Usually NLS is a
true global option.
NLS is global option only for people with en_* locale, who,
Not sure if this is intentional now that package building is back online
from the compromise, but they are indeed still that old...
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/amd64/packages-8-stable/All/
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-8-stable/All/
Nice to see 8.4 out though
Hi;
lini...@freebsd.org writes:
The ports, and the reason and date that they have been scheduled
for removal, are listed below. If no one has stepped forward before
that time to propose a way to fix the problems (such as via a PR),
the ports will be deleted.
portname:
Dear
I got the following error when trying to compile gettext from 8.4-RELEASE
FreeBSD 8.4-RELEASE #0 r251259
=== perl-5.14.2_3 depends on shared library: gdbm.4 - not found
=== Verifying install for gdbm.4 in /usr/ports/databases/gdbm
=== gdbm-1.9.1 depends on executable: gmake - not
On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 09:50:50AM +0100, Chris Rees wrote:
For years, people have been begging him to get over his fear of
OPTIONS, and he sits in the way of progress against almost everyone's
wishes.
It's funny -- it's not just my fear of options -- every FreeBSD using
co-worker I talk to
On 7 June 2013 18:49, Andrew W. Nosenko andrew.w.nose...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 8:15 PM, Chris Rees utis...@gmail.com wrote:
I can see your point when talking about DOCS, but for NLS it's insanity
*for general use*. Give me an example of where NLS non-globals are
appropriate
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 05:23:18PM -0400, Kenta Suzumoto wrote:
- It fetches almost 700 patches from what seems like a dial-up
connection in AUSTRALIA.
You might as well be downloading a 1080p movie from a rock in the north
pole, because that's about how fast it is.
This can be very easily
On 7 June 2013 18:55, Jim Trigg jtr...@spamcop.net wrote:
On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 08:45:10AM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
The compatibility code to parse the WITH/WITHOUT entries in make.conf
will be removed in 6 months either.
Do not forget to convert your configuration (make.conf,
El día Friday, June 07, 2013 a las 04:47:32AM -0700, Cy Schubert escribió:
Hi,
I'm out of town at the moment but I'll take a look at this sometime next
week. If you want please submit a PR for this as well.
done.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=179416
matthias
--
On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 08:09:30PM +0100, Chris Rees wrote:
On 7 June 2013 18:55, Jim Trigg jtr...@spamcop.net wrote:
On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 08:45:10AM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
The compatibility code to parse the WITH/WITHOUT entries in make.conf
will be removed in 6 months either.
On 6/6/2013 8:26 AM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
Ports using USE_GITHUB are currently broken. Github changed their
tar/compression algorithm which has resulted in mismatched checksums.
I am working on changing our implementation and updating all affected
ports and should have the fix committed by
Marcnbsp;Mysterionbsp;amp; Flonbsp;Ridanbsp;Team Up On Charitable
Exclusive Release to Benefit lsquo;One Fund Bostonrsquo; (Marathon Bombing
Victims)
BOSTON, JUNEnbsp;7h, 2013/WCR/nbsp;Globe-Trotting DJ/Producer
Marcnbsp;Mysterionbsp;teams up with Flonbsp;Ridanbsp;on a release
On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 04:49:56PM -0400, Jim Trigg wrote:
On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 08:09:30PM +0100, Chris Rees wrote:
On 7 June 2013 18:55, Jim Trigg jtr...@spamcop.net wrote:
On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 08:45:10AM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
The compatibility code to parse the
On 8/06/2013 4:42 AM, Joseph Mingrone wrote:
Hi;
lini...@freebsd.org writes:
The ports, and the reason and date that they have been scheduled
for removal, are listed below. If no one has stepped forward before
that time to propose a way to fix the problems (such as via a PR),
the ports
I did this in a stupid way. I am sending this out in case someone met the
same problem (or to say, you want to build openjdk on an platform that have
no older version of JDK supported).
The main idea is, firstly find a generic FreeBSD 8.2 system, build the
openjdk7 package (well, there is no
The /usr/ports/sysutils/pam_mount port is broken, because it's expecting an
older version of libHX. I'd really like to have a working pam_mount, and am
willing to paypal US $50 over to the first person who gets it working. I'm
not subscribed to the list, so please email me directly to claim
On 8/06/2013 1:57 PM, Janet Sullivan wrote:
The /usr/ports/sysutils/pam_mount port is broken, because it's
expecting an older version of libHX. I'd really like to have a
working pam_mount, and am willing to paypal US $50 over to the first
person who gets it working. I'm not subscribed to
45 matches
Mail list logo
