On 5/25/2014 07:04, Perry Hutchison wrote:
Some months ago, Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org wrote:
... if you need any help staging your ports I can provide reviews.
I have a couple of ports that need staging support added, and I've
finally managed to find time to look into it. Having
2014-05-25 7:04 GMT+02:00 Perry Hutchison per...@pluto.rain.com:
post-install:
- @[ -f ${PREFIX}/etc/diskcheckd.conf ] \
- || ${CP} -p ${PREFIX}/etc/diskcheckd.conf.sample \
- ${PREFIX}/etc/diskcheckd.conf
+ @[ -f
On 5/25/2014 09:09, Zsolt Udvari wrote:
2014-05-25 7:04 GMT+02:00 Perry Hutchison per...@pluto.rain.com:
post-install:
- @[ -f ${PREFIX}/etc/diskcheckd.conf ] \
- || ${CP} -p ${PREFIX}/etc/diskcheckd.conf.sample \
- ${PREFIX}/etc/diskcheckd.conf
+
2014-05-25 9:12 GMT+02:00 John Marino freebsd.cont...@marino.st:
no, the @sample keyword in pkg-plist does that (replacing other lines
there). pkg doesn't do this by itself, it needs to be told.
Yes, this is more accurate.
___
Perry Hutchison wrote:
Some months ago, Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org wrote:
... if you need any help staging your ports I can provide reviews.
I have a couple of ports that need staging support added, and I've
finally managed to find time to look into it. Having read such
On Sun, 25 May 2014 04:14:42 -0400
Fbsd8 fb...@a1poweruser.com wrote:
Perry Hutchison wrote:
Some months ago, Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org wrote:
... if you need any help staging your ports I can provide reviews.
I have a couple of ports that need staging support added, and
- Add a patch to fix the result of xmlRoot because of changing
the layout in May 2014
- Specify LICENSE BSD - BSD3CLAUSE
-
Build ID: 20140525085600-64898
Job owner: t...@freebsd.org
Buildtime: 41
Dear port maintainer,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated,
On Tue, 20 May 2014 19:12:36 +0100
Matthew Seaman matt...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 20/05/2014 18:34, Richard Kuhns wrote:
So doesn't that mean that the net-snmp port is doing things wrong?
If pkg *isn't* installed it's pretty safe to say that net-snmpd is
not going to be able to use pkg(8) to
Submitter-Id: free...@nagilum.org
Originator:free...@nagilum.org
Organization:
Confidential: no
Synopsis: stagify mail/up-imapproxy
Severity: non-critical
Priority: low
Category: ports
Class: sw-bug
Release: FreeBSD 9.2-STABLE i386
Environment:
System:
On Sat, 24 May 2014 10:03:23 +0200
olli hauer wrote:
On 2014-05-23 23:57, Herbert J. Skuhra wrote:
Hi,
after updating p5-Net-DNS from version 0.74 to 0.75
postfix-policyd-weight (0.1.15.2) stopped working.
I get the below error on two systems:
May 23 13:31:35 mx
Hi,
I'm trying to replace my pkg-plist (www/typo3*, 12k lines) with
autoplist.
do-install:
${MKDIR}
${STAGEDIR}${PREFIX}/${TYPO3WWW}/${PORTNAME}-${TYPO3RELEASE}
${CP} -R ${WRKDIR}/${TYPO3SRC} ${STAGEDIR}${PREFIX}/${TYPO3WWW}/
${LN} -fs ../${TYPO3SRC}
Helmut Schneider wrote:
@${FIND} ${STAGEDIR}${PREFIX}/${TYPO3WWW} \( -type f -or -type
l \) | \
${SED} -ne 's#^${WRKSRC}#${TYPO3WWW}#p' | ${SORT}
${TMPPLIST}
@${FIND} ${STAGEDIR}${PREFIX}/${TYPO3WWW} -type d | \
${SED} -ne
Hi,
pkg-fallout-buil...@freebsd.org sends me every other day mails about
failing mail/courier build for both 10.0 and 11.0 FreeBSD versions.
There is some incompatibility with GCC 4.7, which is used to build
mail/courier on systems with system compiler switched to clang. It
works, however, with
I found a PR which was closed with the same error (Its originator had fixed it
by reinstalling all ports.)
..
This persists in dbus, po4a, etc and I reinstalled exactly as UPDATING all
docbook, as well as
a fix someone recently found for it, to the extent it was
Hi!
In the mean time, could someone review PR ports/190209 which addresses
this issue (http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=190209)? It is
really simple and should solve package builder failures for [REL -
10i386-default], [REL - 10amd64-default], [REL - 10i386-quarterly],
[REL -
Upstream has moved distfiles to github.
New depend on libechonest
2 patches accepted upstream so they're dropped
1 new patch generated and added
http://people.freebsd.org/~sbruno/clementine_1.2.3.txt
sean
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
On Sun, 25 May 2014 22:10:08 +0200
Kurt Jaeger p...@opsec.eu wrote:
Hi!
In the mean time, could someone review PR ports/190209 which
addresses this issue
(http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=190209)? It is really
simple and should solve package builder failures for [REL -
Hi!
In the mean time, could someone review PR ports/190209 which
addresses this issue
(http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=190209)? It is really
simple and should solve package builder failures for [REL -
10i386-default], [REL - 10amd64-default], [REL - 10i386-quarterly],
On Sun, 25 May 2014 22:43:14 +0200
Kurt Jaeger li...@opsec.eu wrote:
Hi!
In the mean time, could someone review PR ports/190209 which
addresses this issue
(http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=190209)? It is
really simple and should solve package builder failures for
Hi!
Do you also plan to upgrade to 0.73. ? With 0.65 we're badly behind
the times, aren't we ?
Yes, this upgrade is long due, but it has some issues too.
What issues does 0.73.1 have ? Is there a list somewhere ?
Frankly, courier looses more and more marketshare, as can be seen on
On Sun, 25 May 2014 23:19:55 +0200
Kurt Jaeger li...@opsec.eu wrote:
Hi!
Do you also plan to upgrade to 0.73. ? With 0.65 we're badly
behind the times, aren't we ?
Yes, this upgrade is long due, but it has some issues too.
What issues does 0.73.1 have ? Is there a list somewhere ?
Am 25.05.2014 23:19, schrieb Kurt Jaeger:
Hi!
Do you also plan to upgrade to 0.73. ? With 0.65 we're badly behind
the times, aren't we ?
Yes, this upgrade is long due, but it has some issues too.
What issues does 0.73.1 have ? Is there a list somewhere ?
Frankly, courier looses more
On Mon, 26 May 2014 03:29:55 +0200
Matthias Andree matthias.and...@gmx.de wrote:
[ snip ]
I'd suggest to let Milan work on the port and tell him the
constraints - for instance, that now staging needs to be addressed
first and then the build-on-10 issue.
OK, I already began work on staging,
24 matches
Mail list logo
