Re: xfce - confusing rights to shutdown without polkit rules

I see, memory played a trick with me. I was sure that --with-ck-launch is complimentary part of rules. Later, I realized ck is activated by dbus. To my excuse: 1. polkit sets wrong permissons on /usr/local/etc/polkit-1 folder and has no rights to read directory 2. example rules have logic

Re: xfce - confusing rights to shutdown without polkit rules

3. You will get all rights without polkit rules. On 23.08.2016 21:25, Olivier Duchateau wrote: On Tue, 23 Aug 2016 19:01:56 +0300 abi wrote: I see, memory played a trick with me. I was sure that --with-ck-launch is complimentary part of rules. Later, I realized ck is

Re: xfce - confusing rights to shutdown without polkit rules

On Tue, 23 Aug 2016 19:01:56 +0300 abi wrote: > I see, memory played a trick with me. I was sure that --with-ck-launch > is complimentary part of rules. Later, I realized ck is activated by dbus. > > To my excuse: > > 1. polkit sets wrong permissons on /usr/local/etc/polkit-1

Re: [CFT] [NEW PORT] www/ufdbguard

22 авг. 2016 г. 11:54 пользователь "Pavel Timofeev" написал: > > Hello, FreeBSD community! > > I've made a port of ufdbGuard - a fork of squidGuard compatible with > newer Squid versions. > Generally speaking it's an URL filter for Squid. >

Re: [CFT] [NEW PORT] www/ufdbguard

Hi! > It' s able to package in poudriere now. > Please, test it. I've tried it in poudriere, it looks very promising, but there is still the same error ? For example, see my buildlog for 11a at http://people.freebsd.org/~pi/logs/www__ufdbguard-11a-1471974874.txt -- p...@opsec.eu

problem with net-mgmt/icinga2 upgrading from 2.4.10 to 2.5.1 (r420729)

Hello! grateful for the great work on the ports I don't remember last problem upgrading with them, Awesome! just a little setback upgraded using portmaster, everything went apparently fine followed pkg-message to update schema db as I use mysql, also fine but when I try to start it I got:

Re: Upcoming OpenSSL 1.1.0 release

Matt Smith wrote: Going slightly off-topic, I'm curious what the opinion is around this and LibreSSL. My organization evaluated this a few months ago and after a few diffs and code reviews decided that libressl was the future. We updated poudriere and all make.confs, removed openssl,

Re: [CFT] [NEW PORT] www/ufdbguard

2016-08-23 21:23 GMT+03:00 Kurt Jaeger : > Hi! > >> It' s able to package in poudriere now. >> Please, test it. > > I've tried it in poudriere, it looks very promising, but there > is still the same error ? > > For example, see my buildlog for 11a at > >

Re: Upcoming OpenSSL 1.1.0 release

On Aug 23 12:19, Roger Marquis wrote: Matt Smith wrote: Going slightly off-topic, I'm curious what the opinion is around this and LibreSSL. My organization evaluated this a few months ago and after a few diffs and code reviews decided that libressl was the future. We updated poudriere and

Delivery Notification, ID 00600645

Dear Customer, This is to confirm that one or more of your parcels has been shipped. You can review complete details of your order in the find attached. Kind regards, Kyle Nixon, Sr. Operation Manager. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: [CFT] [NEW PORT] www/ufdbguard

Hi! > > I've tried it in poudriere, it looks very promising, but there > > is still the same error ? > > > > For example, see my buildlog for 11a at > > > > http://people.freebsd.org/~pi/logs/www__ufdbguard-11a-1471974874.txt > That's weird, I can't reproduce it. Then normally it's my extensive

Re: Upcoming OpenSSL 1.1.0 release

On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 12:54 PM, Matt Smith via freebsd-ports < freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> wrote: > On Aug 23 12:19, Roger Marquis wrote: > >> Matt Smith wrote: >> >>> Going slightly off-topic, I'm curious what the opinion is around this >>> and LibreSSL. >>> >> >> My organization evaluated this

Re: [CFT] [NEW PORT] www/ufdbguard

Hi! > I've updated shar file and it build in poudriere-devel now. I simply > eliminated that check. > Please, test again ;) Done, builds, committed, thanks! -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 4 years to go ! ___

net/3proxy: a fix to commit

Hello, can anybody have a look and commit it if possible? https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209463 Thank you! ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any

Re: net/3proxy: a fix to commit

Hi! > can anybody have a look and commit it if possible? > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209463 Done. Thanks! -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 4 years to go ! ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org

Re: [CFT] [NEW PORT] www/ufdbguard

2016-08-23 22:46 GMT+03:00 Kurt Jaeger : > Hi! > >> > I've tried it in poudriere, it looks very promising, but there >> > is still the same error ? >> > >> > For example, see my buildlog for 11a at >> > >> > http://people.freebsd.org/~pi/logs/www__ufdbguard-11a-1471974874.txt > >>

Re: Upcoming OpenSSL 1.1.0 release

Hi I am excited about opensl 1.1 but I am not sure if it is right to just jump the security/openssl port to it, maybe make a new security/openssl11 port? Or move the default port but add a new security/openssl10 port for 1.0.2. Chris On 22 August 2016 at 19:39, Mathieu Arnold

FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date

Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated,

Re-packaging and old syle packages, adding MANIFEST

Hello, Is it feasible to just add the +MANIFEST file to a binary package (namely Kaspersky for FreeBSD 8.X) to make it recognised by pkgng ? Thanks, -- Xavier ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list

DTrace and java/openjdk8

Hi, I am attempting to use DTrace with openjdk8 on 10.3 amd64, but trying to enable the -XX:+ExtendedDTraceProbes flag in the JVM fails with "ExtendedDTraceProbes flag is not applicable for this configuration". After some searching I found that this should be related to a DTRACE_ENABLED flag not

tuxtype not play game.

Hi, Atsushi Hasumoto. tuxtype is Which keyword is also not output. FreeBSD11.0-RC1 amd64 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to

Re: Upcoming OpenSSL 1.1.0 release

On Aug 22 20:39, Mathieu Arnold wrote: ports-committers is a *NEVER POST DIRECTLY TO* list, so, moving it to ports@ where this belongs a lot more. +--On 22 août 2016 20:30:15 +0200 Bernard Spil wrote: | Curious to know how we should procede with the upgrade of the OpenSSL |

Re: xfce - confusing rights to shutdown without polkit rules

On Tue, 23 Aug 2016 16:44:32 +0300 a...@abinet.ru wrote: > > > Hello, > > I have something mysterious on my installation. I reinstalled, but I > still have the issue. > > xfce4-session states that I must write ck rules to get rights for reboot > and shutdown. However, I have all rights

xfce - confusing rights to shutdown without polkit rules

Hello, I have something mysterious on my installation. I reinstalled, but I still have the issue. xfce4-session states that I must write ck rules to get rights for reboot and shutdown. However, I have all rights (reboot, shutdown, suspend hibernate) without any rules at all. All I need is

Re: fontconfig update uglifies fonts

On 08/22/16 19:41, Pierre Guinoiseau wrote: Hi, can I suggest replacing Bitstream Vera with DejaVu? Bitstream Vera fonts have been unmaintained for more than 12 years and have a lot of hinting issues, whereas DejaVu fonts are a very popular and well maintained fork of them and have a very nice

Re: Upcoming OpenSSL 1.1.0 release

> I am excited about opensl 1.1 but I am not sure if it is right to just > jump the security/openssl port to it, maybe make a new > security/openssl11 port? > > Or move the default port but add a new security/openssl10 port for 1.0.2. this would only increase the mess we have, and create only