Central builds don't find py36- flavored packages?

I got several failure notices with this error: ===> Carla-1.9.7.b.279 depends on package: py36-sip>=4.19.2 - not found ===> Carla-1.9.7.b.279 depends on package: /packages/All/py36-sip-4.19.2,1.txz - not found ===> USE_PACKAGE_DEPENDS_ONLY set - not building missing dependency from

Re: [HEADSUP] Flavors, and specifically, Python flavors landing today

> On 1. Dec 2017, at 9:28 AM, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > > Le 01/12/2017 à 07:20, Franco Fichtner a écrit : >> Hi, >> >>> On 30. Nov 2017, at 4:32 PM, Mathieu Arnold wrote: >>> >>> | See Ports now have flavors enabled| >>> | Tool developers, see

Re: [HEADSUP] Flavors, and specifically, Python flavors landing today

Le 01/12/2017 à 07:20, Franco Fichtner a écrit : > Hi, > >> On 30. Nov 2017, at 4:32 PM, Mathieu Arnold wrote: >> >> | See Ports now have flavors enabled| >> | Tool developers, see https://wiki.freebsd.org/Ports/FlavorsTools| >> | All Python dependencies must have

pkg flavors breaks "make run-depends-list"

*2* 09:05 (25) "py-pytz" root@thompson# make run-depends-list py27-pytz-2017.3,1: "/usr/ports/devel/py-setuptools@py27" non-existent -- dependency list incomplete /usr/ports/lang/python27 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list

FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date

Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated,

Re: [HEADSUP] Flavors, and specifically, Python flavors landing today

Hi, > On 30. Nov 2017, at 4:32 PM, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > > | See Ports now have flavors enabled| > | Tool developers, see https://wiki.freebsd.org/Ports/FlavorsTools| > | All Python dependencies must have @${PY_FLAVOR} appended to them| Very nice work, a thank you to all

Re: details of beefy12 poudriere jail pkg build environments

On 01/12/17 17:54, Jan Beich wrote: > Why do you use 12.0-CURRENT packages on 11.1-RELEASE? > > http://beefy12.nyi.freebsd.org/data/head-amd64-default/p455158_s326378/logs/node8-8.9.1_1.log > contains 'llvm_version': '5.0', > >

Re: Welcome flavors! portmaster now dead? synth?

> On 1 Dec, 2017, at 10:59, Kevin Oberman wrote: > > First, welcome flavors. It has been badly needed for a while and is going > to clean up a couple of messes that have been plaguing the port system for > a long time. > > Second, whither port msanagement tools? At least

Re: poudriere, python ports, and flavors oh my?

On Fri, 01 Dec 2017, René Ladan wrote: > Op 1 dec. 2017 19:06 schreef "Henrik Hudson" : > > So, I must be missing something. I have a poudriere jail specific > make.conf like this: > > # > #unset some options by default > OPTIONS_UNSET= ALSA APIDOCS BONJOUR CUPS DEBUG

Re: firefox-esr and Java ?

On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 07:21:22PM +0100, Kurt Jaeger wrote: Hi! For a very specific app I'm looking for a way to enable Java support in firefox-esr -- does anyone know how to do this ? Thanks! -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 3 years to go !

Last flavorless revision?

ports/UPDATING does not seem to include an entry noting the last subversion revision prior to the flipping on flavors. Is revision 455205 the penultimate revision? -- Steve ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list

firefox-esr and Java ?

Hi! For a very specific app I'm looking for a way to enable Java support in firefox-esr -- does anyone know how to do this ? Thanks! -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 3 years to go ! ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org

Re: poudriere, python ports, and flavors oh my?

Op 1 dec. 2017 19:06 schreef "Henrik Hudson" : So, I must be missing something. I have a poudriere jail specific make.conf like this: # #unset some options by default OPTIONS_UNSET= ALSA APIDOCS BONJOUR CUPS DEBUG DOCBOOK DOCS EXAMPLES GNUTLS HTMLDOCS \ PULSEAUDIO

RE: Welcome flavors! portmaster now dead? synth?

> First, welcome flavors. It has been badly needed for a while and is going to > clean up a couple of messes that have been plaguing the port system for a > long time. > > Second, whither port msanagement tools? At least portmaster now appears > dead. Any reason to expect it to be workable again?

Re: details of beefy12 poudriere jail pkg build environments

(disclaimer: only portmgr@ knows enough details how builds are done) Oliver Schonrock writes: > I am not familiar with the intricacies of how the relevant package is > selected. Looking at this page again: > > https://pkg-status.freebsd.org/ Only builds from "Type:

Re: details of beefy12 poudriere jail pkg build environments

On 01/12/17 18:46, Jan Beich wrote: > Only builds from "Type: package" are uploaded to pkg.freebsd.org. > Packages are built on the *oldest* supported release for a given branch. > Until a day ago packages for 11.* were built on 11.0 which has Clang 3.8 > in base. The next build should happen on

Welcome flavors! portmaster now dead? synth?

First, welcome flavors. It has been badly needed for a while and is going to clean up a couple of messes that have been plaguing the port system for a long time. Second, whither port msanagement tools? At least portmaster now appears dead. Any reason to expect it to be workable again? I have not

Re: Last flavorless revision?

> On 1 Dec, 2017, at 13:07, Steve Kargl > wrote: > > ports/UPDATING does not seem to include an entry noting > the last subversion revision prior to the flipping on > flavors. Is revision 455205 the penultimate revision? https://svnweb.freebsd.org -- Adam

Re: Last flavorless revision?

On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 01:42:27PM -0700, Adam Weinberger wrote: > > On 1 Dec, 2017, at 13:07, Steve Kargl > > wrote: > > > > ports/UPDATING does not seem to include an entry noting > > the last subversion revision prior to the flipping on > > flavors. Is

Re: pkg flavors breaks "make run-depends-list"

Le 01/12/2017 à 10:17, ja...@thompson.dyslexicfish.net a écrit : > *2* 09:05 (25) "py-pytz" root@thompson# make run-depends-list > py27-pytz-2017.3,1: "/usr/ports/devel/py-setuptools@py27" non-existent -- > dependency list incomplete > /usr/ports/lang/python27 I fixed both build and

ports do not build anymore due to python version issues issues

Just updatet the ports tree to r455280. No python depending port is building anymore. According to /usr/ports/UPDATING, tag 20171130, some has to do "make FLAVOUR=pyXX" for a certain port. This weird text also states, that poudriere >3.2.X users also do not have to worry. First: running

Re: pkg flavors breaks "make run-depends-list"

Hi Mat‎hieu, I personaly use Make depends-list‎ in a python tools ( https://gitlab.com/lbartoletti/portsgraph)  to draw a graph of dependencies from ports. I hope release it a day. Regards. Envoyé de mon smartphone BlackBerry 10.   Message d'origine   De: Mathieu Arnold Envoyé: vendredi 1

Re: FreeBSD 11 - does virtualbox work for you ?

On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 03:33:10PM +0100, Patrick Lamaiziere wrote: > Le Thu, 30 Nov 2017 16:05:20 +0100, > Patrick Lamaiziere a écrit : > > Hello, > > > Does Virtualbox work for you on 11-STABLE (today stable) ? > > > > I've tried virtualbox 5.2 (built from port and

Re: FreeBSD 11 - does virtualbox work for you ?

Le Thu, 30 Nov 2017 16:05:20 +0100, Patrick Lamaiziere a écrit : Hello, > Does Virtualbox work for you on 11-STABLE (today stable) ? > > I've tried virtualbox 5.2 (built from port and packages) and 5.1 > (from quarterly packages) and when using a guest (windows 7) it

details of beefy12 poudriere jail pkg build environments

I have not dived down this deep into the ports => pkg build system before, so excuse me if I get this wrong. TLDR; - I suspect that the package I get from beefy12 in this build: https://pkg-status.freebsd.org/builds/default:default:head-amd64:p455158_s326378:beefy12 was built in a jail

Re: details of beefy12 poudriere jail pkg build environments

Oliver Schonrock writes: > I suspect that the package I get from beefy12 in this build: > > https://pkg-status.freebsd.org/builds/default:default:head-amd64:p455158_s326378:beefy12 > > was built in a jail with clang < 4.0.0 (ie FreeBSD 11, not 11.1 or > stable). My local

poudriere, python ports, and flavors oh my?

So, I must be missing something. I have a poudriere jail specific make.conf like this: # #unset some options by default OPTIONS_UNSET= ALSA APIDOCS BONJOUR CUPS DEBUG DOCBOOK DOCS EXAMPLES GNUTLS HTMLDOCS \ PULSEAUDIO SOUND STATIC TESTS X11 XINERAMA XORG #fetch arguments - set

Any chance of upgrading www/npm to 5.6.0?

Hi, Currently, with npm-5.4.2_2, I'm getting: WARNING: You are likely using a version of node-tar or npm that is incompatible with this version of Node.js. Please use either the version of npm that is bundled with Node.js, or a version of npm (> 5.5.1 or < 5.4.0) or node-tar (> 4.0.1) that is

Re: poudriere, python ports, and flavors oh my?

On Fri, 01 Dec 2017, Henrik Hudson wrote: > On Fri, 01 Dec 2017, René Ladan wrote: > > > Op 1 dec. 2017 19:06 schreef "Henrik Hudson" : > > > > So, I must be missing something. I have a poudriere jail specific > > make.conf like this: > > > > # > > #unset some options by

Re: Any chance of upgrading www/npm to 5.6.0?

On 12/01/2017 14:46, Jonathan Chen wrote: Hi, Currently, with npm-5.4.2_2, I'm getting: WARNING: You are likely using a version of node-tar or npm that is incompatible with this version of Node.js. Please use either the version of npm that is bundled with Node.js, or a version of npm (>

Re: Any chance of upgrading www/npm to 5.6.0?

On 01/12/17 22:46, Jonathan Chen wrote: > Currently, with npm-5.4.2_2, I'm getting: do you really need node9? that is what you are getting by installing www/node. I had more luck with "www/npm-node8" which is a combination of the two that actually works OK together? -- Oliver Schönrock

Re: Any chance of upgrading www/npm to 5.6.0?

On 2 December 2017 at 11:55, Oliver Schonrock wrote: > On 01/12/17 22:46, Jonathan Chen wrote: >> Currently, with npm-5.4.2_2, I'm getting: > > do you really need node9? that is what you are getting by installing > www/node. www/node is what gets installed as a dependancy

Re: Any chance of upgrading www/npm to 5.6.0?

On 01/12/17 23:17, Jonathan Chen wrote: > www/node is what gets installed as a dependancy when installing > www/npm. There is an expectation that they will behave well together. I agree, but to be honest, that's the least of your problems with front-end js stuff which changes every 5 minutes ;-)

Re: [HEADSUP] Flavors, and specifically, Python flavors landing today

Hi bug: /etc/make.conf has DEFAULT_VERSIONS += python=3.6, but flavor ignore this setting. reason: When ${PYTHON_DEFAULT} == ${PYTHON3_DEFAULT}, skip adding ${PYTHON_DEFAULT} to ${FLAVORS}, so ${PYTHON2_DEFAULT} set to ${FLAVOR}. On 2017/12/01 00:32, Mathieu Arnold wrote: |Hi,| | | |TL;DR:|

Re: firefox-esr and Java ?

Hi! > >For a very specific app I'm looking for a way to enable > >Java support in firefox-esr -- does anyone know how to do this ? > I advice you to try to install and use java/icedtea-web. It is web browser > plugin which aim is to run Java applets. For me it works at least for part > of

Re: Welcome flavors! portmaster now dead? synth?

On Sat, 2 Dec 2017 at 2:36 am, Carmel NY wrote: > > First, welcome flavors. It has been badly needed for a while and is > going to > > clean up a couple of messes that have been plaguing the port system for a > > long time. > > > > Second, whither port msanagement tools?

misc/compat ports "orphaned"? Well, not really

pkg version -vL= shows both compat9x-amd64 and compat10x-amd64 as orphaned. pkg info compat10x-amd64 shows "Origin : misc/compat10x" ls -d /usr/ports/misc/compat10x says that the port is still there. I can reinstall it with no errors, but pkg version still shows it as orphaned. Same is