Hi,
On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 02:43:41PM +0200, Ciernik Tomas wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am experiencing fatal error during start after upgrading bind99 to
> bind911.
>
> I used soon-to-be-EOL bind99 in chrooted environment with support for
> dynamically adding of zones. With upgrade to bind911 I
On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 12:32:28AM +, Montgomery-Smith, Stephen wrote:
> On 06/12/2018 04:20 PM, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 08:28:07PM +, Montgomery-Smith, Stephen wrote:
> >>
> >> Or if you just send him a request without a patch, he may get
> >> around to it sometime.
On 06/12/2018 04:20 PM, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 08:28:07PM +, Montgomery-Smith, Stephen wrote:
>>
>> Or if you just send him a request without a patch, he may get
>> around to it sometime.
>
> This seems to work.
>
> cd /usr/ports
> svn merge -r 469260:469259 .
>
What
Is it possible to build math/octave with QT4?
The recent switch to require QT5 in r469260
leads to an unusable octave (unless one's
intention is to debug QT5).
% gdb81
/usr/local/libexec/octave/4.4.0/exec/amd64-portbld-freebsd12.0/octave-gui
octave-gui.core
> bt
#0 0x0002056b244d in
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 08:28:07PM +, Montgomery-Smith, Stephen wrote:
>
> Or if you just send him a request without a patch, he may get
> around to it sometime.
This seems to work.
cd /usr/ports
svn merge -r 469260:469259 .
--
Steve
___
Sorry for top posting, but I am using Outlook to reply.
You should really send this request to the maintainer, because he could have
very easily overlooked this email. He is step...@freebsd.org.
If you submit a PR with a patch, preferably one which uses options to let the
user decide
Mjor heads up.
FYI LibreSSL is stil openssl 1.0.1 compliant
OPenssl 1.0.2 is widely gainingg acceptance.
OPenssl 1.1 is out there but there is resistance.
I have been notice ports with OPenssl 1.1 incompliency.
I have worked with BIND , EXIM and INN , Apache and Proftpd
and Postgresql,