poudriere overlays build failed with xargs: illegal option -- e

2020-05-15 Thread Miroslav Lachman
I am trying to use port overlays with poudriere-devel. I have main tree with old quaterly branch from December 2019 (default). The overlay contains just a bunch of ports from current tree with updated versions of Apache, Python etc. and Mk from current ports tree. This is called mfh_overlay. I

Re: Conflict on very first port (xorg) on rpi3

2020-05-15 Thread Danilo G. Baio
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 08:19:22AM -0700, bob prohaska wrote: > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 12:33:10AM -0700, Mark Millard via freebsd-ports > wrote: > > > > Some building and isntalling had to occur prior to the > > textproc/py-sphinx18 build attempt, possibly from > > prior session(s) of building

Re: Conflict on very first port (xorg) on rpi3

2020-05-15 Thread bob prohaska
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 12:33:10AM -0700, Mark Millard via freebsd-ports wrote: > > Some building and isntalling had to occur prior to the > textproc/py-sphinx18 build attempt, possibly from > prior session(s) of building and installing. > > In this case x11/xorg was the first port attempted

Re: poudriere overlays build failed with xargs: illegal option -- e

2020-05-15 Thread Bryan Drewery
On 5/15/2020 6:21 AM, Miroslav Lachman wrote: > I am trying to use port overlays with poudriere-devel. > I have main tree with old quaterly branch from December 2019 (default). > The overlay contains just a bunch of ports from current tree with > updated versions of Apache, Python etc. and Mk from

Re: Conflict on very first port (xorg) on rpi3

2020-05-15 Thread bob prohaska
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 01:49:21PM -0300, Danilo G. Baio wrote: > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 08:19:22AM -0700, bob prohaska wrote: > > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 12:33:10AM -0700, Mark Millard via freebsd-ports > > wrote: > > > > > > Some building and isntalling had to occur prior to the > > >

Re: Conflict on very first port (xorg) on rpi3

2020-05-15 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-ports
On 2020-May-15, at 08:19, bob prohaska wrote: > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 12:33:10AM -0700, Mark Millard via freebsd-ports > wrote: >> >> Some building and isntalling had to occur prior to the >> textproc/py-sphinx18 build attempt, possibly from >> prior session(s) of building and installing.

Re: Conflict on very first port (xorg) on rpi3

2020-05-15 Thread Chris
On Fri, 15 May 2020 11:05:54 -0700 bob prohaska f...@www.zefox.net said On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 01:49:21PM -0300, Danilo G. Baio wrote: > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 08:19:22AM -0700, bob prohaska wrote: > > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 12:33:10AM -0700, Mark Millard via freebsd-ports > wrote: > > > >

Re: Conflict on very first port (xorg) on rpi3

2020-05-15 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-ports
On 2020-May-15, at 13:03, bob prohaska wrote: > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 12:33:02PM -0700, Mark Millard wrote: >> [Gack: devel/cmake needs devel/py-sphinx by default >> and devel/llvm80 needs both devel/cmake and >> devel/py-pshinx18 by default.] >> >> On 2020-May-15, at 11:59, Mark Millard

Re: Conflict on very first port (xorg) on rpi3

2020-05-15 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-ports
On 2020-May-15, at 11:05, bob prohaska wrote: > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 01:49:21PM -0300, Danilo G. Baio wrote: >> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 08:19:22AM -0700, bob prohaska wrote: >>> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 12:33:10AM -0700, Mark Millard via freebsd-ports >>> wrote: Some building and

Re: Conflict on very first port (xorg) on rpi3

2020-05-15 Thread bob prohaska
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 12:33:02PM -0700, Mark Millard wrote: > [Gack: devel/cmake needs devel/py-sphinx by default > and devel/llvm80 needs both devel/cmake and > devel/py-pshinx18 by default.] > > On 2020-May-15, at 11:59, Mark Millard wrote: > > > > On 2020-May-15, at 11:05, bob prohaska

Re: Conflict on very first port (xorg) on rpi3

2020-05-15 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-ports
[Gack: devel/cmake needs devel/py-sphinx by default and devel/llvm80 needs both devel/cmake and devel/py-pshinx18 by default.] On 2020-May-15, at 11:59, Mark Millard wrote: > > On 2020-May-15, at 11:05, bob prohaska wrote: > >> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 01:49:21PM -0300, Danilo G. Baio wrote:

Re: poudriere overlays build failed with xargs: illegal option -- e

2020-05-15 Thread Miroslav Lachman
On 2020-05-15 19:36, Bryan Drewery wrote: ===>  Patching for python27-2.7.18 xargs: illegal option -- e usage: xargs [-0opt] [-E eofstr] [-I replstr [-R replacements] [-S replsize]] [-J replstr] [-L number] [-n number [-x]] [-P maxprocs] [-s size] [utility [argument

Recommendation softether

2020-05-15 Thread The Doctor via freebsd-ports
This a VPN product yet to be ported to FreeBSD. IT is a open source and we can contribute. Originators: University of Tsukba, Japan. -- Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist

Re: Recommendation softether

2020-05-15 Thread Michael Butler via freebsd-ports
On 5/15/20 5:50 PM, The Doctor via freebsd-ports wrote: > This a VPN product yet to be ported to FreeBSD. > > IT is a open source and we can contribute. Originators: > > University of Tsukba, Japan. > It's already there .. security/softether-devel Softether VPN 4 (stable beta version)

Re: Conflict on very first port (xorg) on rpi3

2020-05-15 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-ports
bob prohaska fbsd at www.zefox.net wrote on Fri May 15 04:30:07 UTC 2020 : > An attempt to compile x11/xorg on a new installation of 12.1 on a Pi3B > resulted in a > conflict: > > ===> Installing for py37-sphinx18-1.8.5_1,1 > ===> Checking if py37-sphinx18 is already installed > ===>

Re: Conflict on very first port (xorg) on rpi3

2020-05-15 Thread Mark Millard via freebsd-ports
On 2020-May-15, at 00:33, Mark Millard wrote: > bob prohaska fbsd at www.zefox.net wrote on > Fri May 15 04:30:07 UTC 2020 : > >> An attempt to compile x11/xorg on a new installation of 12.1 on a Pi3B >> resulted in a >> conflict: >> >> ===> Installing for py37-sphinx18-1.8.5_1,1 >> ===>