Re: Status of PEAR ports

2020-10-16 Thread Thierry Thomas
Le ven. 16 oct. 20 à 11:14:42 +0200, Andrea Venturoli 
 écrivait :

> Hello.

Hello,

> I'm maintaing a software that uses some pear packages, i.e.
> php74-pear-1.10.6
> php74-pear-MDB2-2.5.0.b5
> php74-pear-MDB2_Driver_pgsql-1.5.0.b4_2
> php74-pear-Mail-1.4.1,1
> php74-pear-Mail_Mime-1.10.9,2
> php74-pear-Mail_Queue-1.2.7_1
> php74-pear-Net_SMTP-1.9.0
> php74-pear-Net_Socket-1.0.14
> 
> What's its support status?
> I see that, e.g., MDB2 was released in 2012, Mail_Queue in 2011.
> 
> I'm seeing lots of warnings/errors:
> 
> > PHP Fatal error:  Cannot unset $this in 
> > /usr/local/share/pear/Mail/Queue.php on line 269
> 
> (Once that is commented:)
> > PHP Warning:  Declaration of Mail_Queue::isError($value) should be 
> > compatible with PEAR::isError($data, $code = NULL) in 
> > /usr/local/share/pear/Mail/Queue.php on line 590
> > PHP Warning:  count(): Parameter must be an array or an object that 
> > implements Countable in /usr/local/share/pear/MDB2.php on line 826
> > PHP Notice:  Only variables should be assigned by reference in 
> > /usr/local/share/pear/Mail/Queue/Container/mdb2.php on line 153
> 
> 
> Are they really compatible with php74?
> Are they abandoned upstream?

Some activities take place in GitHub. E.g. for MDB2 and Mail_Queue:
- https://github.com/pear/MDB2
- https://github.com/pear/Mail_Queue

but no release seem produced.

The Horde project used to be an important consumer of PEAR packages, but
they are working on switching to a new framework:
https://wiki.horde.org/Project/NoMorePear

Regards.
-- 
Th. Thomas.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: Commiter need: net-im/openfire: Update to 4.5.4

2020-10-16 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi!

> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250284

Done.

-- 
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372Now what ?
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: gvfs delay on login?

2020-10-16 Thread Gleb Popov
On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 1:45 PM Christoph Moench-Tegeder 
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> ## Jonathan Chen (j...@chen.org.nz):
>
> > I recently updated my ports, and with the update of gvfs-1.46_1, I'm
> > noticing a 20s delay when I log in with mate-session. The closest
> > indication as to what may be the problem is in one of my logs:
> >
> > ** Message: 15:35:14.744: Initializing gksu extension...
> > Error creating proxy: Error calling StartServiceByName for
> > org.gtk.vfs.GoaVolumeMonitor: Timeout was reached (g-io-error-quark,
> > 24)
>
> Yes, that's the problem. The most basic workaround is to build
> gvfs without option GOA ("Gnome Online Accounts"), that's what
> I did (I don't use mate and don't have that specific login problem,
> but a lot of other stuff shows related troube, timouts, failures, ...).
>
> The real fix would be to figure out how to get the required dbus
> services running - gvfs source provides some systemd units, which
> are not that helpful for us (obvious reasons, yeah).
>

It is sufficient to provide service files to enable D-Bus autostart
functionality:
https://foss.heptapod.net/bsdutils/bsdisks/-/blob/branch/default/org.freedesktop.UDisks2.service.in
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Re: gvfs delay on login?

2020-10-16 Thread Christoph Moench-Tegeder
Hi,

## Jonathan Chen (j...@chen.org.nz):

> I recently updated my ports, and with the update of gvfs-1.46_1, I'm
> noticing a 20s delay when I log in with mate-session. The closest
> indication as to what may be the problem is in one of my logs:
> 
> ** Message: 15:35:14.744: Initializing gksu extension...
> Error creating proxy: Error calling StartServiceByName for
> org.gtk.vfs.GoaVolumeMonitor: Timeout was reached (g-io-error-quark,
> 24)

Yes, that's the problem. The most basic workaround is to build
gvfs without option GOA ("Gnome Online Accounts"), that's what
I did (I don't use mate and don't have that specific login problem,
but a lot of other stuff shows related troube, timouts, failures, ...).

The real fix would be to figure out how to get the required dbus
services running - gvfs source provides some systemd units, which
are not that helpful for us (obvious reasons, yeah).
On the other hand, I'm not that interested in the whole online-accounts
integration; I'm an old-timer and prefer to not to depend too hard
on other people's systems for my personal stuff (ObPicture: old man
yells at cloud).

Depending on the feasibility of making those dbus services work,
perhaps the default setting for the GOA option should be unset?
But then I don't consider myself a typical enough user to have
much say on that.

Regards,
Christoph

-- 
Spare Space
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


Status of PEAR ports

2020-10-16 Thread Andrea Venturoli

Hello.

I'm maintaing a software that uses some pear packages, i.e.
php74-pear-1.10.6
php74-pear-MDB2-2.5.0.b5
php74-pear-MDB2_Driver_pgsql-1.5.0.b4_2
php74-pear-Mail-1.4.1,1
php74-pear-Mail_Mime-1.10.9,2
php74-pear-Mail_Queue-1.2.7_1
php74-pear-Net_SMTP-1.9.0
php74-pear-Net_Socket-1.0.14

What's its support status?
I see that, e.g., MDB2 was released in 2012, Mail_Queue in 2011.

I'm seeing lots of warnings/errors:


PHP Fatal error:  Cannot unset $this in /usr/local/share/pear/Mail/Queue.php on 
line 269


(Once that is commented:)

PHP Warning:  Declaration of Mail_Queue::isError($value) should be compatible 
with PEAR::isError($data, $code = NULL) in /usr/local/share/pear/Mail/Queue.php 
on line 590
PHP Warning:  count(): Parameter must be an array or an object that implements 
Countable in /usr/local/share/pear/MDB2.php on line 826
PHP Notice:  Only variables should be assigned by reference in 
/usr/local/share/pear/Mail/Queue/Container/mdb2.php on line 153



Are they really compatible with php74?
Are they abandoned upstream?

If anyone is using them, did you have to patch them in some way?

 bye & Thanks
av.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date

2020-10-16 Thread portscout
Dear port maintainer,

The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can
safely ignore the entry.

You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations
below.

Full details can be found at the following URL:
http://portscout.freebsd.org/po...@freebsd.org.html


Port| Current version | New version
+-+
textproc/templates_parser   | 17.0.0  | v21.0.0
+-+


If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page
for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of
distfiles on a per-port basis:

http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt

Reported by:portscout!
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"