Re:[is somebody working on a xorg 7.1 port to FreeBSD ?]

2006-08-04 Thread ssedov
ssedov at mbsd.msk.ru wrote: You can install X.org from GIT repository - it works fine out-of-the-box on freebsd. Just install it under the different PREFIX (e.g. /usr/x11r7) and you will not have problems with uninstall. I don't appear to have the same luck as I'm having problems with

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - ruby18

2006-08-04 Thread Sergey Matveychuk
Mariusz Kownacki wrote: Hello, Since few days i have problem with installing ruby from ports (/usr/ports/lang/ruby18). According to advices I attach additional information. I would be grateful for any help. OS version: FreeBSD xxx 6.1-STABLE FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE --- [EMAIL

Re: little problem with pkg-plist

2006-08-04 Thread Vasil Dimov
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 05:58:20PM +0200, Jona Joachim wrote: Vasil Dimov wrote: On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 03:10:19PM +0200, Jona Joachim wrote: Vasil Dimov wrote: On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 11:49:51PM +0200, Jona Joachim wrote: Hi! I ported SGE (SDL Graphics Extension) to FreeBSD and ran

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - ruby18

2006-08-04 Thread Florent Thoumie
On Fri, 2006-08-04 at 11:46 +0400, Sergey Matveychuk wrote: Mariusz Kownacki wrote: Hello, Since few days i have problem with installing ruby from ports (/usr/ports/lang/ruby18). According to advices I attach additional information. I would be grateful for any help. OS

Re: 6-stable packages on FTP servers

2006-08-04 Thread Erwin Lansing
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 07:04:59AM -0400, Richard Bejtlich wrote: Hello, I was wondering if someone could comment on the status of package building for 6-stable. A look at pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/ shows: If the port is building, why does it not appear on the FTP servers? This

Re: 6-stable packages on FTP servers

2006-08-04 Thread Erwin Lansing
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 07:25:19AM -0400, Richard Bejtlich wrote: On 8/4/06, Erwin Lansing [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Quite simple, the -exp build is with experimental patches to the infrastructure that needed extensive testing. That testing is only now finishing, so any packages that were

Re: 6-stable packages on FTP servers

2006-08-04 Thread Richard Bejtlich
On 8/4/06, Erwin Lansing [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm currently uploading packages for i386-5, I'll start a new build for i386-6 later today, so new packages will be available later next week. The cluster was tight up for the last few weeks with other builds. Cheers, -erwin Understood.

Re: awstats-6.5_1,1 is forbidden: Command Injection Vulnerability.

2006-08-04 Thread IOnut
On Wed, 2 Aug 2006 13:46:04 +0330 Babak Farrokhi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Awstats-devel (which has solved this security issue) is in GNATS waiting for submission (PR ports/100162). If nothing bad happens once again, I plan to dedicate all the upcoming weekend for committing the PRs I

Re: little problem with pkg-plist

2006-08-04 Thread Jona Joachim
Vasil Dimov wrote: On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 05:58:20PM +0200, Jona Joachim wrote: Vasil Dimov wrote: On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 03:10:19PM +0200, Jona Joachim wrote: Vasil Dimov wrote: On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 11:49:51PM +0200, Jona Joachim wrote: Hi! I ported SGE (SDL Graphics Extension) to

HEADS-UP: DESTDIR support committed to Mk/

2006-08-04 Thread Gábor Kövesdán
Hi, I am pleased to announce, that portmgr committed my patch for ports infrastructure DESTDIR support today. Note that this support is only for the infrastructure, ports may or may not respect the DESTDIR macro, so you should use this with care. Also note, that we only tested this patchset

Re: HEADS-UP: DESTDIR support committed to Mk/

2006-08-04 Thread Renato Botelho
On 8/4/06, Gábor Kövesdán [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I am pleased to announce, that portmgr committed my patch for ports infrastructure DESTDIR support today. Note that this support is only for the infrastructure, ports may or may not respect the DESTDIR macro, so you should use this with

adding additional empty target in bsd.port.mk

2006-08-04 Thread Stanislav Sedov
Hi! Some of some ports install files into shared location, e.g. several ruby ports installs docs into subdirectory under ${RUBY_DOCDIR}, ocaml ports - into subdirectory of ${OCAML_DOCSDIR}. As this directories might not exists before installing, they should be removed after uninstall, so there

Re: adding additional empty target in bsd.port.mk

2006-08-04 Thread Florent Thoumie
On Fri, 2006-08-04 at 23:04 +0400, Stanislav Sedov wrote: Hi! Some of some ports install files into shared location, e.g. several ruby ports installs docs into subdirectory under ${RUBY_DOCDIR}, ocaml ports - into subdirectory of ${OCAML_DOCSDIR}. As this directories might not exists before

Re: adding additional empty target in bsd.port.mk

2006-08-04 Thread Stanislav Sedov
On Fri, 04 Aug 2006 20:12:13 +0100 Florent Thoumie [EMAIL PROTECTED] mentioned: Seems overkill to me. Why not creating those directories in ocaml and ruby ports? That way you don't even have to deal with them in ocaml-dependents and ruby-dependents ports. I think creation of empty DOCSDIR

Re: adding additional empty target in bsd.port.mk

2006-08-04 Thread Stanislav Sedov
On Fri, 04 Aug 2006 20:12:13 +0100 Florent Thoumie [EMAIL PROTECTED] mentioned: Seems overkill to me. Why not creating those directories in ocaml and ruby ports? That way you don't even have to deal with them in ocaml-dependents and ruby-dependents ports. Furthermore it will not help when

Re: mercurial not working

2006-08-04 Thread Michael P. Soulier
On 04/08/06 Ollivier Robert said: After hg init, the only thing that you should find is a directory called data, itself containing nothing. Only after the first add/commit or import should you find anything else. *sigh* It's been a long week. I think my brain failed. I knew that too, but