Hi,
I think use /usr/bin/env bash is better than /usr/local/bin/bash in
portability.
/Eric
On Sat, 2008-01-19 at 02:23 +0530, आशीष शुक्ल Ashish Shukla wrote:
Hi,
I encountered a problem with gdm. The file
/usr/local/etc/gdm/Xsession needs /usr/local/bin/bash for its
execution, whereas
Hi Marius,
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 10:33:27 +0100
Marius Strobl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The __gthread_active_p(), which returns false positives prior
to the current version of gthr-posix.h, isn't only used in
libstdc++ but also in headers that are installed beneath
/usr/include/c++. So the code
On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 09:44:05AM +1100, Andrew Reilly wrote:
Hello again,
[to recap: drscheme, (which is an IDE that runs under the mred
runtime, built from ports/lang/drscheme (or actually manually
from a personal copy of that Makefile that builds the current
release: 372, rather than
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 16:18:31 +0800
Eric L. Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think use /usr/bin/env bash is better than /usr/local/bin/bash
in portability.
I concur. I have written several scripts that are used on various
operating systems and found using the '/usr/bin/env' notation in the
Cheers,
Can somebody please commit ports/119664 ? It is an important bugfix,
without nobody can install Rubygems.
Thanks,
Jonathan
--
Jonathan Weiss
http://blog.innerewut.de
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
Hello,
I have a server with round about 200 installed Ports. I need
to setup a second server with the same, but slightly newer,
ports recompiled from source.
Is there an easy way to crate a port list with compile options
and feed a build command on the second server with it?
Thanks in advance.
Eric L Chen writes:
Eric Hi,
Eric I think use /usr/bin/env bash is better than /usr/local/bin/bash
in
Eric portability.
True, but is this reported as P.R., hmm...?
Thanks
--
Ashish Shukla आशीष शुक्ल http://wahjava.wordpress.com/
·-- ·- ·--- ·- ···- ·-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a server with round about 200 installed Ports. I need
to setup a second server with the same, but slightly newer,
ports recompiled from source.
Is there an easy way to crate a port list
Use the Root and Leaf sections from 'portmaster -l'
Can I get a little love for ports/119544 and get someone to commit it?
thanks! It will simplify my deployment process to have it as a package.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To
On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 09:10:14PM +1100, Andrew Reilly wrote:
Hi Marius,
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 10:33:27 +0100
Marius Strobl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The __gthread_active_p(), which returns false positives prior
to the current version of gthr-posix.h, isn't only used in
libstdc++ but
I was cloning the linux kernel git tree on a gjournal'd partition.
After git did its usual initial stuff it spat some errors during check
out:
...
Checking 23062 files out...
error: git-checkout-index: unable to create file
include/asm-arm/arch-integrator/cm.h (Interrupted system call)
100%
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 19:41:54 -0500
Alexandre \Sunny\ Kovalenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am I right to assume that this is *not* i386? I have 7-PRERELEASE (i386)
cvsup'ed on January 22, early morning EST, and mred built from vanilla
372 sources (per your earlier recommendation) on January 8th.
On Tue, 2008-01-22 at 21:10 +1100, Andrew Reilly wrote:
Hi Marius,
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 10:33:27 +0100
Marius Strobl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The __gthread_active_p(), which returns false positives prior
to the current version of gthr-posix.h, isn't only used in
libstdc++ but also in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Vivek Khera wrote:
Can I get a little love for ports/119544 and get someone to commit it?
thanks! It will simplify my deployment process to have it as a package.
DONE.
Cheers,
- --
Xin LI [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.delphij.net/
FreeBSD -
On Mon, 2008-01-21 at 14:07 +0100, Rene Ladan wrote:
2008/1/21, Bruce M Simpson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
I still haven't rebuilt everything on my system, and have /usr/X11R6
symlinked to /usr/local,
so libchk generates a lot of false positives.
maybe consider removing $x11base from
This security advisory contains numerous vulnerabilities with proposed
patches related to xorg-server and libXfont.
Is it expected to be committed? (flz CC'ed)
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg/2008-January/031918.html
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg/2008-January/032099.html
16 matches
Mail list logo