Re: TrueCrypt 5.0 - Built, short test result: Ok.

Are you able to transfer let's say the content of /usr/local/bin to it? I'm still able to deadlock the whole vfs by doing something like that. Zitiere Olivier Cochard-Labbe vom Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 02:07:38PM +0100: > Hi all, > > > > Port at http://www.triplefork.net/truecrypt.tgz has updated ch

net-im/psi update plans?

Hi, I was wondering what plans were in the works for net-im/psi version 0.11 and/or development snapshots of 0.12? I just looked at GNATS and found PR ports/120324. Any estimates when this might get committed? Thanks, Kelly Hays ___ freebsd-ports@freeb

Re: obexftp - call for testers

Thank you very much for testing. As of the L6i failing: maybe it's just another UUID (like siemens and sharp - see the obexftp(1) -U ). But this is way beyond the scope of my attempt. Judging from the upstreams wiki at http://dev.zuckschwerdt.org/openobex/wiki/SupportedPhonesMotorola the L6i is

Re: portmaster did not replace port

Doug Barton wrote: Miroslav Lachman wrote: Hi, I am trying to use portmaster to replace installed GnuPG 2 with GnuPG 1. portmaster -o security/gnupg1 gnupg-2.0.4 But it always ends with gnupg-2.0.4 re-installed again, so now I have both versions installed. Is it possible to use portmaster for

Re: New version while port is on the waiting list

On Friday 22 February 2008 17:05:34 Igor Serikov wrote: > Hello porters, > > I have submitted a new port. While it was sitting in the PR database - > and it is still there - I produced a new version. > What can/should I do? > > Regards, > Igor. > >

Re: portmaster did not replace port

Miroslav Lachman wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to use portmaster to replace installed GnuPG 2 with GnuPG 1. > portmaster -o security/gnupg1 gnupg-2.0.4 > > But it always ends with gnupg-2.0.4 re-installed again, so now I have > both versions installed. Is it possible to use portmaster for this tas

Re: caching problems

On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 19:22:10 +0200 gareth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hey guys, our proxy is caching extremely old copies of the ports index > and portaudit databases from freebsd.org. our admins claim that they > cache the following files i need normally: > > http://www.FreeBSD.org/ports/auditf

portmaster did not replace port

Hi, I am trying to use portmaster to replace installed GnuPG 2 with GnuPG 1. portmaster -o security/gnupg1 gnupg-2.0.4 But it always ends with gnupg-2.0.4 re-installed again, so now I have both versions installed. Is it possible to use portmaster for this task? (gnupg-2.0.4 was misinstalled by

Re: caching problems

> hey guys, our proxy is caching extremely old copies of the ports index > and portaudit databases from freebsd.org. our admins claim that they > cache the following files i need normally: > > http://www.FreeBSD.org/ports/auditfile.tbz > http://www.FreeBSD.org/ports/INDEX-6.bz2 > > since they hav

Re: Portupgrade not running get_notinstalled_depends (2.4.3_1, 2 vs 2.4.3_2, 2)

On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 9:32 AM, James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > For example, in my tests, if I have an alt-dep set for a package and > I install a port that depends on that package it'll still install > the original package rather than my alt-dep. In case anyone's interested or running int

caching problems

hey guys, our proxy is caching extremely old copies of the ports index and portaudit databases from freebsd.org. our admins claim that they cache the following files i need normally: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ports/auditfile.tbz http://www.FreeBSD.org/ports/INDEX-6.bz2 since they have no no-cache pr

Re: New version while port is on the waiting list

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Igor Serikov wrote: >Hello porters, Hello, > > I have submitted a new port. While it was sitting in the PR database - > and it is still there - I produced a new version. > What can/should I do? Submit a followup with the new diff/shar Have a

Re: New version while port is on the waiting list

On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 08:05:34 -0800 Igor Serikov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello porters, > > I have submitted a new port. While it was sitting in the PR database - > and it is still there - I produced a new version. > What can/should I do? > > Regards, > Igor. Send the new .shar (

Re: portupgrade changed operation?

On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 12:01:42 -0500 (EST) "Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ---> Skipping 'www/apache13' because a requisite port 'lang/perl5.8' > failed (specify -k to force) > > But I *DO* want apache upgraded, even if I have perl5.8 in > HOLD_PKG. > > It is behav

Re: New version while port is on the waiting list

Igor Serikov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >Hello porters, > > I have submitted a new port. While it was sitting in the PR database - > and it is still there - I produced a new version. > What can/should I do? Just submit the new set of patches in a followup to the same PR. ___

portupgrade changed operation?

Hi, Using "portupgrade 2.4.1 (2008/01/29)". I have 509 packages, and a 1/2 dozen in HOLD_PKG. I went to run it today, and oddly it started doing things like : [Gathering depends for textproc/php5-xml done] [Gathering depends for archivers/php5-zlib .. done] [Gathering depends for por

New version while port is on the waiting list

Hello porters, I have submitted a new port. While it was sitting in the PR database - and it is still there - I produced a new version. What can/should I do? Regards, Igor. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/m

Re: FreeBSD Port: timeseal-1.0 - Bad system call

Kris Kennaway wrote: > peter bird wrote: >> pulsarity# timeseal >> Bad system call > > Use ktrace to determine what the syscall is. It uses compat.sigaction. 1199 timeseal CALL compat.sigaction 1199 timeseal RET compat.sigaction -1 errno 78 Function not implemented Björn ___