On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 12:48:00PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
>Michel Talon wrote:
>> Since the compilation will take most of the
>> time, it is not relevant to consider performance questions on the
>> portmaster side.
>
>Having spent a substantial amount of time doing performance tuning on
>portmas
School ate any free time I had to work on ports 2.0. For this reason I
would like to find some way to make it a Summer of Code project. Kip
Macy has provisionally agreed to mentor it if a) it is approved by
Google and FreeBSD, b) No one more qualified steps forward.
Project goals (SoC porti
Pav Lucistnik wrote:
Kris Kennaway píše v čt 20. 03. 2008 v 23:51 +0100:
A user pointed out to me that on the project ideas page the following
entry remains:
Write a new utility for the pkg_install suite, possibly named
pkg_upgrade(1), implementing a subset of existing portupgrade
functiona
Kris Kennaway píše v čt 20. 03. 2008 v 23:51 +0100:
> > A user pointed out to me that on the project ideas page the following
> > entry remains:
> >
> > Write a new utility for the pkg_install suite, possibly named
> > pkg_upgrade(1), implementing a subset of existing portupgrade
> > functiona
Doug Barton wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
A user pointed out to me that on the project ideas page the following
entry remains:
Write a new utility for the pkg_install suite, possibly named
pkg_upgrade(1), implementing a subset of existing portupgrade
functionali
Doug Barton píše v čt 20. 03. 2008 v 13:12 -0700:
> Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> > Doug Barton píše v c(t 20. 03. 2008 v 01:05 -0700:
> >> On Thu, 20 Mar 2008, Michel Talon wrote:
> >>
> >>> i would venture to say that such an utility
> >>> should be able to upgrade things based of *binary* packages, and
Can you take a look at that patch and commit it. The PR is
3 weeks old.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/121370
Many Thanks
--
Steven Kreuzer
http://www.exit2shell.com/~skreuzer
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.fr
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 01:12:06PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
>
> Fair enough, but can we please come quickly to a consensus on what
> _all_ of the requirements should be? Two things I'd like to avoid. One
> is the feeling that no matter how many hoops I jump through, there is
> always going to be
Peter Olsson wrote:
> TMPDIR doesn't seem to be set at all, I don't have it in "set".
> Shell is bash.
Ok.
> Here is /etc/make.conf if that is relevant:
> WITHOUT_X11=yes
> WITHOUT_GUI=yes
I would try commenting these two out and see what happens.
> # added by use.perl 2008-01-13 14:50:56
> PE
Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> Doug Barton píe v c(t 20. 03. 2008 v 01:05 -0700:
>> On Thu, 20 Mar 2008, Michel Talon wrote:
>>
>>> i would venture to say that such an utility
>>> should be able to upgrade things based of *binary* packages, and
>>> consequently that portmaster is not a suitable candidate.
Sean C. Farley wrote:
>BTW, I think the +IGNOREME files for portmaster should be
>in /var/db/ports, so they may traverse a manual pkg_delete && make
>install.
I'm ambivalent about that, since the way I personally tend to use
+IGNOREME is to avoid dealing with something till I'm ready t
Sean C. Farley wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Mar 2008, Doug Barton wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 20 Mar 2008, Michel Talon wrote:
>>
>>> In my opinion, an example of a correct "pkg_upgrade" type programm
>>> written in C++ is the Debian apt-get. It works predictably, fast,
>>> etc. One of its features, that i consid
David Wolfskill wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 01:05:27AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
>> ...
>>> One of the
>>> requirements of an upgrade system is predictability, this can only
>>> be achieved by using binary packages.
>> You gain a certain amount of flexibility with packages, at the expense of
Michel Talon wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 01:05:27AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
>> On Thu, 20 Mar 2008, Michel Talon wrote:
>>
>>> Doug Barton wrote:
>>> i would venture to say that such an utility
>>> should be able to upgrade things based of *binary* packages, and
>>> consequently that portmas
Ivan Voras wrote:
On 20/03/2008, Doug Poland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Peter Pentchev wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 12:02:42AM +0300, Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
>> * Ivan Voras ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>>> Is there a utility that would do that, and if not, does anyone have the
>>> time to
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 01:05:27AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> Now all that said, I'd love to see us move to a much more robust package
> management system, or even just a better interface to the one we have. The
> problem is that I don't have the time to do that as a volunteer project,
> a
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 02:51:45PM -0400, Steven Kreuzer wrote:
> Greetings-
>
> I am in the process of updating a port to the latest version (dns/dnsperf)
> and I ran into an issue I was able to work around but I want to see if
> there is a nicer way to do it.
>
> One of the differences between
Greetings-
I am in the process of updating a port to the latest version (dns/dnsperf)
and I ran into an issue I was able to work around but I want to see if
there is a nicer way to do it.
One of the differences between the version in ports and the current version
is the addition of a shell script
Gerald W. Lester píše v čt 20. 03. 2008 v 08:43 -0500:
> How come there is a tcl8.4 entry on the sections pull down but no 8.5
> entries?
The versioned tcl/tk categories are going away soon. In the new order,
everything will be just tcl or tk.
--
Pav Lucistnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Doug Barton píše v čt 20. 03. 2008 v 01:05 -0700:
> On Thu, 20 Mar 2008, Michel Talon wrote:
>
> > i would venture to say that such an utility
> > should be able to upgrade things based of *binary* packages, and
> > consequently that portmaster is not a suitable candidate.
>
> That ability is not
Peter Pentchev wrote:
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 12:02:42AM +0300, Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
The purpose is similar - creating jails out of host system in fast
and easy way, possibility to strip everything unneeded (useful for
secure minimal jails or flash/livecd/embedded installations of
minimal
On 20/03/2008, Doug Poland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Peter Pentchev wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 12:02:42AM +0300, Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
> >> * Ivan Voras ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >>> Is there a utility that would do that, and if not, does anyone have the
> >>> time to write one?
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 09:34:38PM +0800, Denise H. G. wrote:
>
> Yes, I've had great impressions by the debian's apt- tools. But it seems
> that the debian package servers maintain an index or something for all
> the packages. And if you want to upgrade or install a certain package,
> you just fe
Peter Pentchev wrote:
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 12:02:42AM +0300, Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
* Ivan Voras ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Is there a utility that would do that, and if not, does anyone have the
time to write one?
>>
Would this not be an appropriate use for packages? If one creates a
pa
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 12:02:42AM +0300, Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
> * Ivan Voras ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Is there a utility that would do that, and if not, does anyone have the
> > time to write one?
>
> Actually, I've already had an idea of utility with pretty similar
> functionality for a
On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 05:23:23 -0700 David Wolfskill wrote:
> I would prefer to do something similar for ports: build my own
> packages on that machine, then be able to use my preferred port
> management tool to run through the list of installed ports on (say)
> my firewall box, and have it fetch t
On Thu, 20 Mar 2008, Doug Barton wrote:
On Thu, 20 Mar 2008, Michel Talon wrote:
In my opinion, an example of a correct "pkg_upgrade" type programm
written in C++ is the Debian apt-get. It works predictably, fast,
etc. One of its features, that i consider very important for correct
operation,
On Thu, 20 Mar 2008, Michel Talon wrote:
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 05:59:28PM +0800, Denise H. G. wrote:
Michel Talon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Actually I don't think a batch download and install process would
help much, especially for a freshly installed system because it might
be a huge down
Hi Des,
I have a patch to unbreak emulators/doscmd on >= 80, would you mind
to have a look at it?
http://people.freebsd.org/~gahr/doscmd.diff
Thanks,
Best Regards
--
Pietro Cerutti
PGP Public Key:
http://gahr.ch/pgp
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
I've noticed that with the current (non-devel) version of portupgrade, when I
was doing a replacement with -o specified, none of the make flags from
pkgtools.conf were being applied like they normally are when I do a normal
upgrade or an install. I haven't had a chance to test portupgrade-devel
How come there is a tcl8.4 entry on the sections pull down but no 8.5
entries?
Also, is there a ports package for TkThread and Tdom (I'm looking for
the "same" package set that ActiveState has on their supported platforms)?
Lastly, any thoughts on a tclkit/basekit for FreeBSD?
Thanks in adva
Michel Talon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 05:59:28PM +0800, Denise H. G. wrote:
>> Michel Talon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> Actually I don't think a batch download and install process would help
>> much, especially for a freshly installed system because it might be
Hi!
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 8:36 AM, Alexander Leidinger
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can you please try this without your settings in make.conf (empty
> make.conf, or at least the smallest possible make.conf you can use)?
I've found that make.conf is irrelevant, but some other thing matters
#
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote:
|
%%PORTDOCS%%share/doc/libnjb-%%PORTVERSION%%/html/dir_d03f56ed3ef2c0e11ac283c787a57d7a.html
|
| is in pkg-plist of libnjb, but I got this file:
| dir_517a6f2c7427bc36231829858e370602.html
|
| Therefore package creation
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 05:59:28PM +0800, Denise H. G. wrote:
> Michel Talon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Actually I don't think a batch download and install process would help
> much, especially for a freshly installed system because it might be a
> huge download job and much waiting time if o
The real question is: ports or packages? Please do not mix them together!
If we are talking about ports and ports updating then portmaster is (now) an
excellent candidate for this job and I vote for portmaster.
If we are talking about packages and package management then portmaster and
all othe
%%PORTDOCS%%share/doc/libnjb-%%PORTVERSION%%/html/dir_d03f56ed3ef2c0e11ac283c787a57d7a.html
is in pkg-plist of libnjb, but I got this file:
dir_517a6f2c7427bc36231829858e370602.html
Therefore package creation fails.
Does this weird filename have something to do with my configuration? Is
pkg-
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 01:05:27AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> ...
> >One of the
> >requirements of an upgrade system is predictability, this can only
> >be achieved by using binary packages.
>
> You gain a certain amount of flexibility with packages, at the expense of
> being able to customize t
Hi!
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 12:48 PM, Pietro Cerutti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | Thank you for this patch, but I need 1.1.1 version (I use some
> | features released here), so I merged you patch with mine. The result
> | is http://fractalizator.googlepages.com/directfb-0.9.16-1.1.1.patch.txt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Anatoly Borodin wrote:
| Thank you for this patch, but I need 1.1.1 version (I use some
| features released here), so I merged you patch with mine. The result
| is http://fractalizator.googlepages.com/directfb-0.9.16-1.1.1.patch.txt
Hi back,
the p
Michel Talon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Doug Barton wrote:
>> So, I renew my inquiry. :) Is portmaster a suitable candidate to fulfill
>> the role of the utility described, and if not, why not?
>
> At the risk of being flamed, i would venture to say that such an utility
> should be able to upg
Dear ,
You have just received a message from Steve Marks at Ray White Whitsunday.
To view your message, please visit the following address:
http://campaign.raywhite.com/ve/ZZP7058X319982X6585w87
To unsubscribe, reply to this email and change the subject to be: unsubscribe
If you have trouble v
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 01:05:27AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Mar 2008, Michel Talon wrote:
>
> >Doug Barton wrote:
> >i would venture to say that such an utility
> >should be able to upgrade things based of *binary* packages, and
> >consequently that portmaster is not a suitable candi
Hi!
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 8:36 AM, Alexander Leidinger
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > # less /var/db/pkg/linux_base-fc6-6_5/+CONTENTS
> > @comment PKG_FORMAT_REVISION:1.1
> > @name linux_base-fc6-6_5
> > @comment ORIGIN:emulators/linux_base-fc6
> > @cwd /compat/linux
> > @conflicts linux_b
On Thu, 20 Mar 2008, Michel Talon wrote:
Doug Barton wrote:
So, I renew my inquiry. :) Is portmaster a suitable candidate to fulfill
the role of the utility described, and if not, why not?
At the risk of being flamed,
I certainly hope not. :)
i would venture to say that such an utility
sh
Hi!
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 8:36 AM, Alexander Leidinger
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> # less /var/db/pkg/linux_base-fc6-6_5/+CONTENTS
> > @comment PKG_FORMAT_REVISION:1.1
> > @name linux_base-fc6-6_5
> > @comment ORIGIN:emulators/linux_base-fc6
> > @cwd /compat/linux
> > @conflicts linux_base
On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 00:42:33 +0100
Pietro Cerutti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> Stefan Thurner wrote:
> | On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 11:43:06PM +0100, Pietro Cerutti wrote:
> |> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> |> Hash: SHA512
> |>
> |> Stefan
47 matches
Mail list logo
