firefox3 support in bsd.gecko.mk

2008-12-15 Thread Dominic Fandrey
There is no firefox3 support in bsd.gecko.mk. This seems to keep plugins and add-ons that would work in Firefox 3 as well from being ported. Regards ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To

rrdtool 1.3.3 and dejavu dependency

2008-12-15 Thread Guido Falsi
Hello, I have noted that the dependency in the subject has been added to the rrdtool port. This has the unfortunate effect of sucking in a libX11 dependency(others too...) which was not before. Maybe I'm an extremist, but I don't like having X11 pieces on headless server machines, I really

Current unassigned ports problem reports

2008-12-15 Thread FreeBSD bugmaster
(Note: an HTML version of this report is available at http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr-summary.cgi?category=ports .) The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and

Re: firefox3 support in bsd.gecko.mk

2008-12-15 Thread Naram Qashat
Dominic Fandrey wrote: There is no firefox3 support in bsd.gecko.mk. This seems to keep plugins and add-ons that would work in Firefox 3 as well from being ported. As far as I understand, plugins for any Mozilla products are made using xulrunner now. Naram Qashat Regards

Re: rrdtool 1.3.3 and dejavu dependency

2008-12-15 Thread Daniel Roethlisberger
Guido Falsi m...@madpilot.net 2008-12-15: I have noted that the dependency in the subject has been added to the rrdtool port. This has the unfortunate effect of sucking in a libX11 dependency(others too...) which was not before. Maybe I'm an extremist, but I don't like having X11 pieces

Re: print/cm-super size mismatch

2008-12-15 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
Heino Tiedemann wrote: Hiroki Sato h...@freebsd.org wrote: Frank Shute fr...@shute.org.uk wrote in 20081206083250.ga54...@melon.esperance-linux.co.uk: fr Hi, fr fr I just had a problem when building print/cm-super. This was because the distfile was updated. The port was also updated

Re: RT 3.8?

2008-12-15 Thread Wesley Shields
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 10:11:51AM -0800, Chris Meyer wrote: Anyone out there working on a port of RT 3.8? The latest version in the tree is rt-3.6.7_1. There was some promising work a few months ago but everything seems to have stopped and there is nothing new in the ports tree... Philip

Re: [ImageMagick] build problem

2008-12-15 Thread regisr
On Thu 2008-12-11 05:27:40 UTC-0800, David Wolfskill wrote: For what it's worth, I did not encounter this. On Fri, 12 Dec 2008 22:59:08 +1100 andrew clarke wrote: Me neither. /usr/obj/home/ports/graphics/ImageMagick/work/ImageMagick-6.4.7-5/tests/.libs/co nstitute -storagetype double

Re: RT 3.8?

2008-12-15 Thread Philip M. Gollucci
Wesley Shields wrote: I've also added him as CC to this reply so he can speak up if he has any more information to add. I've gotten several comments (esp recently). My first thought is to commit it as is and let the PRs come it. Several people have been using the prototype in production for

Re: RT 3.8?

2008-12-15 Thread Wesley Shields
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 02:46:04PM -0500, Philip M. Gollucci wrote: Wesley Shields wrote: There was some promising work a few months ago but everything seems to have stopped and there is nothing new in the ports tree... Philip (pgollucci@) was working on it. I know he has been very busy

Re: RT 3.8?

2008-12-15 Thread Matthew Seaman
Philip M. Gollucci wrote: Unfortunately, the RT ports in the tree (esp p5-) will need to change to use this instead since RT36 isn't packagable. Which is why they were still there, but they seem to have got comitted today by someone else. I'm the maintainer of the half dozen or so RT

[Fwd: Re: Firebird client fails port install]

2008-12-15 Thread Da Rock
I tried the questions list, but I can't seem to get an answer apart from a workaround (which I already implemented anyway). Any ideas on how to fix this? ---BeginMessage--- On Mon, 2008-12-15 at 14:29 -0500, Lowell Gilbert wrote: Da Rock rock_on_the_...@comcen.com.au writes: I'm trying to

Re: APNG patch for graphics/png port

2008-12-15 Thread Coleman Kane
On Sun, 2008-12-14 at 22:54 -0600, Jeremy Messenger wrote: On Sun, 14 Dec 2008 12:22:34 -0600, Coleman Kane cok...@freebsd.org wrote: Hello, I recently played with building Thunderbird 3.0b1 from source (it works pretty well, btw). I was playing with some of the options to enable

Problem with net/x11vnc update.

2008-12-15 Thread Beech Rintoul
I'm trying to update the x11vnc port to the latest and I'm getting the following configure error: checking jpeglib.h usability... yes checking jpeglib.h presence... yes

Re: Problem with net/x11vnc update.

2008-12-15 Thread Beech Rintoul
On Monday 15 December 2008 15:25:34 Chuck Swiger wrote: On Dec 15, 2008, at 4:15 PM, Beech Rintoul wrote: I'm trying to update the x11vnc port to the latest and I'm getting the following configure error: checking jpeglib.h usability... yes checking jpeglib.h presence... yes checking

Re: Problem with net/x11vnc update.

2008-12-15 Thread Chuck Swiger
On Dec 15, 2008, at 4:15 PM, Beech Rintoul wrote: I'm trying to update the x11vnc port to the latest and I'm getting the following configure error: checking jpeglib.h usability... yes checking jpeglib.h presence... yes checking for jpeglib.h... yes checking for jpeg_CreateCompress in -ljpeg...

Re: Problem with net/x11vnc update.

2008-12-15 Thread Beech Rintoul
On Monday 15 December 2008 15:35:22 Garrett Cooper wrote: On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 4:33 PM, Beech Rintoul be...@alaskaparadise.com wrote: On Monday 15 December 2008 15:25:34 Chuck Swiger wrote: On Dec 15, 2008, at 4:15 PM, Beech Rintoul wrote: I'm trying to update the x11vnc port to the

Re: APNG patch for graphics/png port

2008-12-15 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 16:38:56 -0600, Coleman Kane cok...@freebsd.org wrote: On Sun, 2008-12-14 at 22:54 -0600, Jeremy Messenger wrote: On Sun, 14 Dec 2008 12:22:34 -0600, Coleman Kane cok...@freebsd.org wrote: Hello, I recently played with building Thunderbird 3.0b1 from source (it works

Re: cvs commit: ports/net/py-pcapy Makefile

2008-12-15 Thread QAT
Hi, The build which triggered this email is done under tinderbox-2.4.3, on 7-STABLE on amd64, with tinderd_flags=-nullfs -plistcheck -onceonly and ccache support, with the official up-to-date Ports Tree, with the following vars set: NOPORTDOCS=yes, NOPORTEXAMPLES=yes, NOPORTDATA=yes,

FreeBSD Port: exim-4.69_2

2008-12-15 Thread Dave Stegner
Am working with Exim, started a few months ago. I have 4.69 port. This evening I wanted to see if there was a newer version available. Still at 4.69, but changes say Makefile was updated 3 days ago to 1.240. I downloaded from webpage and examined files, specifically Makefile. It is still the