diablo-jre16

2009-03-10 Thread Nataraj S Narayan
Hi I am getting the following after installing jre. [r...@freebsd /usr/ports/java/diablo-jre16]# java /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object libpthread.so.2 not found, required by java What should be done to fix this? regards Nataraj ___

Re: diablo-jre16

2009-03-10 Thread Lars Engels
Quoting Nataraj S Narayan natara...@gmail.com: Hi I am getting the following after installing jre. [r...@freebsd /usr/ports/java/diablo-jre16]# java /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object libpthread.so.2 not found, required by java What should be done to fix this? You can probably fix this

Re: Wine and CURRENT

2009-03-10 Thread Guy Brand
Marius Nünnerich (mar...@nuenneri.ch) on 09/03/2009 at 13:02 wrote: It's been that way for a few months now and it's still the same with wine-1.1.15 port. I do not run wine on current but I think I saw this error when I increased KVA_PAGES on 7-stable. Did you do that? What architecture

samba-3.3.1 and pam (sshd)

2009-03-10 Thread Johan Hendriks
Hello all i have updated my samba-3.2.8 to samba-3.3.1. This machine is joined to a windows 2003 server. I used the following line in my /etc/pam.d/sshd to use pam authentication of some windows users. authsufficient /usr/local/lib/pam_winbind.so This all Works for samba-3.2.x

portsnap

2009-03-10 Thread Nataraj S Narayan
Hi After a 'portsnap fetch' is it portsnap extract or is it portsnap update? What is the proper way? I user FreeBSD 7.1 regards Nataraj ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To

Re: portsnap

2009-03-10 Thread Olivier SMEDTS
2009/3/10 Nataraj S Narayan natara...@gmail.com: Hi After a 'portsnap fetch' is it portsnap extract or is it portsnap update?  What is the proper way? Hello, portsnap extract extracts the entire ports tree, replacing existing files and directories (from the manpage). portsnap update only

Reports on the Outsourcing Industry

2009-03-10 Thread ValueNotes Outsourcing Practice
This email newsletter was sent to you in graphical HTML format. If you're seeing this version, your email program prefers plain text emails. You can read the original version online:

Re: portsnap

2009-03-10 Thread RW
On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 14:05:16 +0100 Olivier SMEDTS oliv...@gid0.org wrote: 2009/3/10 Nataraj S Narayan natara...@gmail.com: Hi After a 'portsnap fetch' is it portsnap extract or is it portsnap update?  What is the proper way? Hello, portsnap extract extracts the entire ports tree,

Re: portsnap

2009-03-10 Thread Ricardo Jesus
Nataraj S Narayan wrote: Hi After a 'portsnap fetch' is it portsnap extract or is it portsnap update? What is the proper way? I user FreeBSD 7.1 regards Nataraj ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: fresh devel/boost

2009-03-10 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 06/03/2009 23:47 Alexander Churanov said the following: Hi guys! I am Alexander Churanov, currently maintaining devel/boost (for several weeks :-). Yes, leaving 1.34 would be awful and nobody is going to do that! For current status, current efforts and decisions see

Re: portmanager modifying bsd.port.mk

2009-03-10 Thread Chuck Robey
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Doug Barton wrote: Chuck Robey wrote: Just before sending my mail, I took a look at the cvs log, last entry is from more than 6 months ago, unless something is somehow fubared with my archive. If it sits unchanged for so long, I interpreted

Re: portmanager modifying bsd.port.mk

2009-03-10 Thread Freddie Cash
On March 10, 2009 10:05 am Chuck Robey wrote: Doug Barton wrote: Chuck Robey wrote: Just before sending my mail, I took a look at the cvs log, last entry is from more than 6 months ago, unless something is somehow fubared with my archive. If it sits unchanged for so long, I interpreted

YOU ARE A WINNER OF YAHOO AWARD GRANTS JANUARY 2009

2009-03-10 Thread YAHOO AWARD CENTER
Awards Centre 124 Stockport Road, Longsight, Manchester M60 2DB - United KingdomTel:+447031925532. This is to inform you that you have won a prize money of Three million,Two Hundred Thousand Great Britain Pounds (GBP 3,200,000.00) for the month of January, 2009 Prize promotion

request for a new port review [memtest86+]

2009-03-10 Thread Andriy Gapon
Guys, could you please review the below port for correctness, style and general approach taken by me. This is a port of memtest86+. Unlike existing sysutils/memtest86 this port is not a download/extraction/version-tracking aid, rather it is designed to build a stand-alone ELF image (bootable

Re: portmanager modifying bsd.port.mk

2009-03-10 Thread Doug Barton
Chuck Robey wrote: Doug, we were speaking of portmanager, not portmaster I realize that. I was simply attempting to support Robert's point. I could have used several other mature ports that I maintain as examples but I thought I'd try to stay as close to on topic as possible. My apologies if

Re: Call for testers: MythTV 0.21 port upgrade

2009-03-10 Thread Bernhard Fröhlich
On Tue, March 10, 2009 10:43 pm, Greg Larkin wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Bernhard Fröhlich wrote: On Fri, January 23, 2009 2:36 am, Greg Larkin wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Bernhard Fröhlich wrote: On Thu, January 15, 2009 11:35 pm, Greg

Re: Call for testers: MythTV 0.21 port upgrade

2009-03-10 Thread Greg Larkin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Bernhard Fröhlich wrote: On Fri, January 23, 2009 2:36 am, Greg Larkin wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Bernhard Fröhlich wrote: On Thu, January 15, 2009 11:35 pm, Greg Larkin wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: