Hi
I am getting the following after installing jre.
[r...@freebsd /usr/ports/java/diablo-jre16]# java
/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object libpthread.so.2 not found,
required by java
What should be done to fix this?
regards
Nataraj
___
Quoting Nataraj S Narayan natara...@gmail.com:
Hi
I am getting the following after installing jre.
[r...@freebsd /usr/ports/java/diablo-jre16]# java
/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object libpthread.so.2 not found,
required by java
What should be done to fix this?
You can probably fix this
Marius Nünnerich (mar...@nuenneri.ch) on 09/03/2009 at 13:02 wrote:
It's been that way for a few months now and it's still the same with
wine-1.1.15 port.
I do not run wine on current but I think I saw this error when I
increased KVA_PAGES on 7-stable. Did you do that? What architecture
Hello all
i have updated my samba-3.2.8 to samba-3.3.1.
This machine is joined to a windows 2003 server.
I used the following line in my /etc/pam.d/sshd to use pam authentication of
some windows users.
authsufficient /usr/local/lib/pam_winbind.so
This all Works for samba-3.2.x
Hi
After a 'portsnap fetch' is it portsnap extract or is it portsnap
update? What is the proper way?
I user FreeBSD 7.1
regards
Nataraj
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To
2009/3/10 Nataraj S Narayan natara...@gmail.com:
Hi
After a 'portsnap fetch' is it portsnap extract or is it portsnap
update? What is the proper way?
Hello,
portsnap extract extracts the entire ports tree, replacing existing
files and directories (from the manpage). portsnap update only
This email newsletter was sent to you in graphical HTML format.
If you're seeing this version, your email program prefers plain text emails.
You can read the original version online:
On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 14:05:16 +0100
Olivier SMEDTS oliv...@gid0.org wrote:
2009/3/10 Nataraj S Narayan natara...@gmail.com:
Hi
After a 'portsnap fetch' is it portsnap extract or is it portsnap
update? What is the proper way?
Hello,
portsnap extract extracts the entire ports tree,
Nataraj S Narayan wrote:
Hi
After a 'portsnap fetch' is it portsnap extract or is it portsnap
update? What is the proper way?
I user FreeBSD 7.1
regards
Nataraj
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
on 06/03/2009 23:47 Alexander Churanov said the following:
Hi guys!
I am Alexander Churanov, currently maintaining devel/boost (for
several weeks :-).
Yes, leaving 1.34 would be awful and nobody is going to do that!
For current status, current efforts and decisions see
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Doug Barton wrote:
Chuck Robey wrote:
Just before sending my mail, I took a look at the cvs log, last entry is from
more than 6 months ago, unless something is somehow fubared with my archive.
If
it sits unchanged for so long, I interpreted
On March 10, 2009 10:05 am Chuck Robey wrote:
Doug Barton wrote:
Chuck Robey wrote:
Just before sending my mail, I took a look at the cvs log, last entry
is from more than 6 months ago, unless something is somehow fubared
with my archive. If it sits unchanged for so long, I interpreted
Awards Centre 124 Stockport Road, Longsight, Manchester M60 2DB -
United KingdomTel:+447031925532.
This is to inform you that you have won a prize money of Three million,Two
Hundred Thousand Great Britain Pounds (GBP 3,200,000.00) for the month of
January, 2009 Prize promotion
Guys,
could you please review the below port for correctness, style and general
approach
taken by me.
This is a port of memtest86+. Unlike existing sysutils/memtest86 this port is
not
a download/extraction/version-tracking aid, rather it is designed to build a
stand-alone ELF image (bootable
Chuck Robey wrote:
Doug, we were speaking of portmanager, not portmaster
I realize that. I was simply attempting to support Robert's point. I
could have used several other mature ports that I maintain as
examples but I thought I'd try to stay as close to on topic as
possible.
My apologies if
On Tue, March 10, 2009 10:43 pm, Greg Larkin wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bernhard Fröhlich wrote:
On Fri, January 23, 2009 2:36 am, Greg Larkin wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bernhard Fröhlich wrote:
On Thu, January 15, 2009 11:35 pm, Greg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bernhard Fröhlich wrote:
On Fri, January 23, 2009 2:36 am, Greg Larkin wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bernhard Fröhlich wrote:
On Thu, January 15, 2009 11:35 pm, Greg Larkin wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash:
17 matches
Mail list logo