An update yesterday or today results in perl5.10's build aborting. When
it failed under portmaster, the messages from several processes were too
jumbled for me to see easily what had happened, so I tried portinstall instead.
It ran for a little while, but then got:
-
[I was also dismayed when I saw the bump].
On 2009-Aug-01 18:33:43 +0100, Matthew Seaman
wrote:
>You could, for instance, run ldd(1) against each of the files a port installs
>and then record in /var/db/pkg/portname-1.2.3/+SHLIBS or equivalently in the
>.tbz package tarball a sorted and uniq'd l
That seems to have have done something more. But I still got some funky
errors after running portmaster -a:
[...at the end]
===>>> Gathering dependency list for x11/xorg-apps from ports
===>>> Starting recursive 'make config' check
===>>> Launching child to update x11/xinput
xorg-apps-7.3 >>
portupgrade -k x11-drivers/xorg-drivers x11/xorg
Barney
On Sat, Aug 01, 2009 at 07:50:45PM +0200, Jens Rasmus Liland wrote:
> So what command am I supposed to run?
>
> On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 4:50 PM, Barney Wolff wrote:
>
> > I got around this by using -k. Dependencies are a maze of twisty
> >
Behind portmaster or what? I do not understand.
On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 5:29 PM, David Southwell wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm getting really weird problems when trying to upgrade my ports. I've
> > already discussed this with Dan Naumov on the stable mailing list, and he
> > is out of ideas on what
So what command am I supposed to run?
On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 4:50 PM, Barney Wolff wrote:
> I got around this by using -k. Dependencies are a maze of twisty
> little passages, all alike. I'll take my chances with the grue.
>
> On Sat, Aug 01, 2009 at 04:17:17PM +0200, Jens Rasmus Liland wrote:
Dirk Meyer wrote:
Hallo Matthew Seaman,
The OP does have a valid point though. I just got an e-mail from Freshpo=
rts
saying that a bunch of ports I maintain had had PORTREVISION bumps becaus=
e of
the jpeg update. Which is all fine and dandy, except that these were the=
=20
www/p5-RT-* exten
Am 01.08.2009 um 17:24 schrieb Julian Elischer:
Stefan Bethke wrote:
(Moving the discussion to -ports.)
Am 31.07.2009 um 00:57 schrieb Matthias Andree:
Am 31.07.2009, 00:36 Uhr, schrieb Bjoern A. Zeeb >:
Yeah that is as great as we are or rather were.
So really, fix the openvpn scripts that
Stefan Bethke wrote:
(Moving the discussion to -ports.)
Am 31.07.2009 um 00:57 schrieb Matthias Andree:
Am 31.07.2009, 00:36 Uhr, schrieb Bjoern A. Zeeb
:
Yeah that is as great as we are or rather were.
So really, fix the openvpn scripts that assign the address to
interfaces to do somethin
I got around this by using -k. Dependencies are a maze of twisty
little passages, all alike. I'll take my chances with the grue.
On Sat, Aug 01, 2009 at 04:17:17PM +0200, Jens Rasmus Liland wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm getting really weird problems when trying to upgrade my ports. I've
> already discus
> Hi,
>
> I'm getting really weird problems when trying to upgrade my ports. I've
> already discussed this with Dan Naumov on the stable mailing list, and he
> is out of ideas on what I am to do. I've tried to fix the problem using
> many different methods (i.e. csup stable-ports-supfile; Portmaste
Hi,
I'm getting really weird problems when trying to upgrade my ports. I've
already discussed this with Dan Naumov on the stable mailing list, and he is
out of ideas on what I am to do. I've tried to fix the problem using many
different methods (i.e. csup stable-ports-supfile; Portmaster -a/-af,
p
On Sat, 01 Aug 2009 10:10:17 +0100
Matthew Seaman wrote:
> The OP does have a valid point though. I just got an e-mail from
> Freshports saying that a bunch of ports I maintain had had
> PORTREVISION bumps because of the jpeg update. Which is all fine and
> dandy, except that these were the www
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 07:37:27PM +0200, Martin Tournoij wrote:
> I now know more than ever why I switched to OpenBSD.
> FreeBSD people no longer seem to care about broken ports, or making people
> who submit broken patches maintainers, or even replying to my messages.
First of all, I have to apo
Hallo Matthew Seaman,
> The OP does have a valid point though. I just got an e-mail from Freshpo=
> rts
> saying that a bunch of ports I maintain had had PORTREVISION bumps becaus=
> e of
> the jpeg update. Which is all fine and dandy, except that these were the=
> =20
> www/p5-RT-* extension mo
Hallo Jerry,
> Thanks for the info. I appreciate it. I don't suppose that there is a
> recommended procedure to prevent just such an occurrence again in the
> future? Not that it is really all that important. I believe that this
> is the first time this has happened to me.
This problems are hard
Am 31.07.2009 um 18:58 schrieb Stefan Bethke:
Am 31.07.2009 um 14:38 schrieb Stefan Bethke:
Here's a first draft at a patch for OpenVPN. With this, the tun
interface gets set to IFF_BROADCAST mode. One small piece is still
missing: OpenVPN tries to install a route for the subnet, but that
On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 19:36:36 +0200
Erik Trulsson wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 12:12:49PM -0400, Jason J. Hellenthal wrote:
> >
> > Now that I have finally upgraded my system in full from the last
> > mix-up with jpeg, You guys have bumped up every PORTREVISION that
> > depends on jpeg "Great
Erik Trulsson wrote:
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 12:12:49PM -0400, Jason J. Hellenthal wrote:
Now that I have finally upgraded my system in full from the last mix-up
with jpeg, You guys have bumped up every PORTREVISION that depends on jpeg
"Great real great" Now I get to spend another three days fi
Jul 31 01:40:30 netserv1 istgt[13674]: Login from iqn.example.net
(10.1.20.15) on iqn.example.net:mail2disk1 LU1 (10.1.10.1:3260,1),
ISID=23d01, TSIH=40, CID=0, HeaderDigest=off, DataDigest=off
Jul 31 03:10:23 netserv1 istgt[13674]:
istgt_iscsi.c:3338:istgt_iscsi_op_nopout: ***ERROR***
StatSN(4
20 matches
Mail list logo
