Re: Error when build mod_jk with apache 2.2 under FreeBSD 7.2-STABLE 64bit?!

2009-09-01 Thread James Chang
Hi Sean, Thanks for your hint, but when I enable mod_proxy and mod_proxy_ajp It will pass all requests to Tomcat. This will cause my apache cannot run php scripts! Is there any method that can run php scripts on apache and pass java request to Tomcat? Best Regards!

Re: Open discution for a fakeroot support for the ports infrastructure

2009-09-01 Thread Peter Pentchev
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 11:26:43PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: Hi, I've written some patches for the ports infrastructure importing the fakeroot implementation from midnightbsd ports. That's actually a good idea. I'm quite used to fakeroot already from some work I've been doing in

Re: Open discution for a fakeroot support for the ports infrastructure

2009-09-01 Thread Peter Pentchev
On Tue, Sep 01, 2009 at 11:02:24AM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote: [snip] This is done either for very, very simple programs where it would be unnecessary overhead to recurse into the upstream's Makefile and run its install target, or for programs where the upstream doesn't even *have* an install

FreeBSD Port: mc-4.6.2 lynx-like motion forgot

2009-09-01 Thread Daniel Dvořák
Hi all, at the beginning I apologize for cross-mailling becuase I really don´t know which mailling list or mail address is the best one for sending my problem. I needed to set up lynx-like motion in configuration of mc. I did it and saved configuration. The application told me that it saved

ports/devel/automake-wrapper: ln: /usr/local/bin/aclocal: File exists

2009-09-01 Thread O. Hartmann
I get permanently this error when doing portmaster -dvf lighttpd. It is essentiel having build everything along the lighttpd server due to a /usr/local/lib corruption. ports/devl/autotools are already installed. Now I get stuck in this nasty error shown below, I can not circumvent. How to

squirrelmail port

2009-09-01 Thread Johan Hendriks
Since when are we using release candidate's of squirrelmail in the ports tree. I think we need an devel port for that so that we can use the stable squirrelmail port as stable, and use the devel port if we want to use beta's and release candidates. Regards, Johan

Re: ports/devel/automake-wrapper: ln: /usr/local/bin/aclocal: File exists

2009-09-01 Thread Gary Jennejohn
On Tue, 01 Sep 2009 10:30:39 + O. Hartmann ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de wrote: I get permanently this error when doing portmaster -dvf lighttpd. It is essentiel having build everything along the lighttpd server due to a /usr/local/lib corruption. ports/devl/autotools are already

Re: Open discution for a fakeroot support for the ports infrastructure

2009-09-01 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
Fucking gmail, I replyed in private instead of the list so here is the reply, sorry That's actually a good idea. I'm quite used to fakeroot already from some work I've been doing in Debian. Currently the fakeroot is not something like the debian fakeroot, ie it is just a directory that is

Re: squirrelmail port

2009-09-01 Thread Thomas Abthorpe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On September 1, 2009 07:36:56 am Johan Hendriks wrote: Since when are we using release candidate's of squirrelmail in the ports tree. I think we need an devel port for that so that we can use the stable squirrelmail port as stable, and use the

Re: boost-python-libs and associated compile errors

2009-09-01 Thread David Southwell
I have just completed # portupgrade -fRra following a system upgrade from freebsd 7.2 p2 to p3 after a few minor hiccuups and recompiling ssome of the ports I am left with four failing ports. As at least three of them seem to share some common features. If anyone would be willing to help me

Re: boost-python-libs and associated compile errors

2009-09-01 Thread Alexander Churanov
David, In your case compiler is actually complaining on /usr/include/c++/4.2/bits/gthr-default.h, which is a part of GCC. It's either an internal issue of GCC or GCC packing/installation issue, or compiler compatibility issue. I'd like to know what is your compiler? Did you perform any steps for

CFT - ioquake3 1.36 port

2009-09-01 Thread Dominic Fandrey
I intend to take the games/ioquake3 port over and need some testers. This is the patch to the port (apply from /usr): http://www.home.hs-karlsruhe.de/~fado0011/patch-ports-games-ioquake3.diff This is a shar that creates a slave port installing SVN-snapshots of ioquake3 (extract from /usr):

Re: boost-python-libs and associated compile errors

2009-09-01 Thread David Southwell
David, In your case compiler is actually complaining on /usr/include/c++/4.2/bits/gthr-default.h, which is a part of GCC. It's either an internal issue of GCC or GCC packing/installation issue, or compiler compatibility issue. I'd like to know what is your compiler? Did you perform any

Mailman: users can't post to a moderated list

2009-09-01 Thread Boris Kochergin
Hi. I'm running mailman-with-htdig-2.1.12 and messages that would normally await moderation (for example, a non-subscribed user posting to a list) disappear into a black hole, and this message appears in logs/errror: Sep 01 13:24:55 2009 (62072) Uncaught runner exception: Generator instance

INDEX build failed for 6.x

2009-09-01 Thread Erwin Lansing
INDEX build failed with errors: Generating INDEX-6 - please wait..Makefile, line 59: Could not find Makefile.svn_rev make: fatal errors encountered -- cannot continue === comms/wsjt failed *** Error code 1 *** Error code 1 Stop in /local0/portmgr/tindex/ports. *** Error code 1 Stop in

Re: CFT - ioquake3 1.36 port

2009-09-01 Thread Dominic Fandrey
Dominic Fandrey wrote: I intend to take the games/ioquake3 port over and need some testers. This is the patch to the port (apply from /usr): http://www.home.hs-karlsruhe.de/~fado0011/patch-ports-games-ioquake3.diff This is a shar that creates a slave port installing SVN-snapshots of

INDEX now builds successfully on 6.x

2009-09-01 Thread Erwin Lansing
___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org

Testers: Here's a patch to update linux-opera to 10.00.

2009-09-01 Thread Jeremy Messenger
Hello all, Here is a patch to update linux-opera to 10.00. It works great with old ~/.linux-opera so far, I haven't seen any problem. I will be out of town for a few days. I need someone to test it more and report any bug if there is any. When I commit it, I am planning to note in the

Migration to new SourceForge URL scheme part 2, SFE and some statistics

2009-09-01 Thread Dmitry Marakasov
Hi! Second (smaller) part ready. This eliminates SOURCEFORGE_EXTENDED as it is not really needed, also translates all SFE ports to new SF scheme. Patch: http://people.freebsd.org/~amdmi3/sourceforge-extended.patch Here's a little stats on SF mirrors (mirrors were taken from sourceforge mirror