Re: tetex and texlive port

2009-12-14 Thread Frank Staals
Anh Ky Huynh wrote: Hi all, I often use TeXLive instead of teTeX which isn't been developed anymore. After I remove teTeX from system, I encounter some problems when building/upgrading ports. For example, _evince_, _lyx_ couldn't be built without teTeX. (In fact, evince and lyx can be used

Re: tetex and texlive port

2009-12-14 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
2009/12/12 Frank Staals fr...@fstaals.net: Anh Ky Huynh wrote: Hi all, I often use TeXLive instead of teTeX which isn't been developed anymore. After I remove teTeX from system, I encounter some problems when building/upgrading ports. For example, _evince_, _lyx_ couldn't be built without

Possibly unbuildable ports reminder

2009-12-14 Thread Bill Fenner
Dear porters, This is just a reminder to please periodically check the list of unbuildable ports at http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/ . A list by MAINTAINER is http://people.freebsd.org/~fenner/errorlogs/ so you can easily check the status of ports that you maintain. In addition, the

Current unassigned ports problem reports

2009-12-14 Thread FreeBSD bugmaster
(Note: an HTML version of this report is available at http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr-summary.cgi?category=ports .) The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and

Re: Re: tetex and texlive port

2009-12-14 Thread Marc Lagrange
On 14/déc - 08:53, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: 2009/12/12 Frank Staals fr...@fstaals.net: Anh Ky Huynh wrote: Hi all, I often use TeXLive instead of teTeX which isn't been developed anymore. After I remove teTeX from system, I encounter some problems when building/upgrading ports. For

Re: tetex and texlive port

2009-12-14 Thread Anh Ky Huynh
On Mon, 14 Dec 2009 15:16:04 +0100 Marc Lagrange rha...@gruik.at wrote: On 14/déc - 08:53, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: 2009/12/12 Frank Staals fr...@fstaals.net: Anh Ky Huynh wrote: Hi all, I often use TeXLive instead of teTeX which isn't been developed anymore. After I remove

New version of the fakeroot patch

2009-12-14 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
Hi all, I have updated the fakeroot patch, it now can apply on an uptodate version of the ports. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/133815 For information the fakeroot patch is a port of the midnightbsd's mports fakeroot to freebsd's ports. What it does: - it is optional: you

Re: tetex and texlive port

2009-12-14 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
I didn't try http://code.google.com/p/freebsd-texlive/ yet but as far as I read in the wiki page http://code.google.com/p/freebsd-texlive/wiki/Installing this port is for *TeXLive 2008* only. TeXLive 2008 has binaries files for FreeBSD (so I can install TeXLive from the live CD

Re: Pointyhat packages

2009-12-14 Thread Dominic Fandrey
Pav Lucistnik wrote: Jonathan píše v čt 10. 12. 2009 v 09:50 -0500: On 12/8/2009 7:52 PM, Miroslav Lachman wrote: What is the policy for package building nodes? I mean, is it possible to use some machines not owned directy by FreeBSD.org? For example, I have spare machine in our rack which I

[Announce] Maintained TeXLive (2009 and devel) binaries for FreeBSD-6,7,8 available

2009-12-14 Thread Nikola Lečić
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 Dear all, The TeXLive binaries for FreeBSD 6, 7 and 8, for i386 and amd64 each, are available for download. I will maintain binary sets for TeXLive 2009; I will also regularly release binaries built from the current SVN TeXLive sources:

Re: Pointyhat packages

2009-12-14 Thread Pav Lucistnik
Dominic Fandrey píše v po 14. 12. 2009 v 16:54 +0100: Can't you just take a jail? Just wondering ... No, unfortunately, jail won't do. The box must be fully dedicated. -- Pav Lucistnik p...@oook.cz p...@freebsd.org See file. Click file. Get file. signature.asc Description:

Re: regression: port www/squid fails to build on ia64 head

2009-12-14 Thread Anton Shterenlikht
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 05:36:01PM +0100, Thomas-Martin Seck wrote: * Anton Shterenlikht (me...@bristol.ac.uk): On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 04:27:12PM -, Thomas-Martin Seck wrote: * Johan Hendriks jo...@double-l.nl: (Squid breakage in the YP/NIS helper) A long shot Could

Re: regression: port www/squid fails to build on ia64 head

2009-12-14 Thread Thomas-Martin Seck
* Anton Shterenlikht (me...@bristol.ac.uk): On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 04:27:12PM -, Thomas-Martin Seck wrote: * Johan Hendriks jo...@double-l.nl: (Squid breakage in the YP/NIS helper) A long shot Could it be that you have set the following in your src.conf WITHOUT_NIS=

port www/libxul broken on sparc64, but builds even on ia64

2009-12-14 Thread Anton Shterenlikht
Port www/libxul is marked as broken on sparc64. HOwever, it builds even on ia64! Could anybody comment on why this port is broken for sparc64? many thanks anton -- Anton Shterenlikht Room 2.6, Queen's Building Mech Eng Dept Bristol University University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK Tel: +44 (0)117

Re: port www/libxul broken on sparc64, but builds even on ia64

2009-12-14 Thread Marcel Moolenaar
On Dec 14, 2009, at 9:04 AM, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: Port www/libxul is marked as broken on sparc64. HOwever, it builds even on ia64! Could anybody comment on why this port is broken for sparc64? Anton, Can you remove the marker from the Makefile and just build it. Let us know how it

Re: New version of the fakeroot patch

2009-12-14 Thread Julien Laffaye
Hi porters, I do agree with the idea of a fakeroot. As bapt said, it will make supporting NOPORTDOCS easier: no more patches against the vendor Makefile(s) !!! It will also ensure the quality of the _packages_. For example, if the port create an empty folder, it's common that the package forget

Re: [Announce] Maintained TeXLive (2009 and devel) binaries for FreeBSD-6, 7, 8 available

2009-12-14 Thread Xin LI
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Nikola, Nikola Lečić wrote: Dear all, The TeXLive binaries for FreeBSD 6, 7 and 8, for i386 and amd64 each, are available for download. I will maintain binary sets for TeXLive 2009; I will also regularly release binaries built from the

Re: port www/libxul broken on sparc64, but builds even on ia64

2009-12-14 Thread Pav Lucistnik
Anton Shterenlikht píše v po 14. 12. 2009 v 17:04 +: Port www/libxul is marked as broken on sparc64. HOwever, it builds even on ia64! Could anybody comment on why this port is broken for sparc64? Here is the relevant log

FreeBSD Port: mysql-server-5.1.41

2009-12-14 Thread IP2 Internet (Jan Baggen)
mysql-server-5.1.41 from ports wont install on FreeBSD 6.3-RELEASE. Building is no problem but with make install we get 'Nothing to be done for'. Software installed: sql01# pkg_info gettext-0.16.1_3GNU gettext package gmake-3.81_2GNU version of 'make' utility libiconv-1.11_1 A

Re: port www/libxul broken on sparc64, but builds even on ia64

2009-12-14 Thread Andreas Tobler
On 14.12.09 18:58, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: On Dec 14, 2009, at 9:04 AM, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: Port www/libxul is marked as broken on sparc64. HOwever, it builds even on ia64! Could anybody comment on why this port is broken for sparc64? Anton, Can you remove the marker from the

Re: port www/libxul broken on sparc64, but builds even on ia64

2009-12-14 Thread Marius Strobl
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 05:04:06PM +, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: Port www/libxul is marked as broken on sparc64. HOwever, it builds even on ia64! Could anybody comment on why this port is broken for sparc64? See the follwing mail for a possible fix:

Re: port www/libxul broken on sparc64, but builds even on ia64

2009-12-14 Thread Anton Shterenlikht
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 09:39:41PM +0100, Andreas Tobler wrote: On 14.12.09 18:58, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: On Dec 14, 2009, at 9:04 AM, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: Port www/libxul is marked as broken on sparc64. HOwever, it builds even on ia64! Could anybody comment on why this port is

Re: deskutils/calibre build error

2009-12-14 Thread Stanislav Sedov
On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 16:29:02 -0600 (CST) Greg Rivers gcr+freebsd-po...@tharned.org mentioned: The deskutils/calibre port fails to build on both 7.2-STABLE and 8.0-STABLE i386: This was caused by recent gnome update. Try the latest version of the port (I just fixed and updated it). --