Re: .Xdefaults ignored
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 5:53 PM, Chris Rees utis...@googlemail.com wrote: 2009/12/17 Sandra Kachelmann s.kachelm...@googlemail.com: I recently noticed that xorg under FreeBSD ignores my ~/.Xdefaults file. I saw with truss that instead .Xdefaults-fqdn is being used: open(/home/skmn/.Xdefaults-prissy.local,O_RDONLY,06362252327) = 5 (0x5) No trace about ~/.Xdefaults Any idea why and if it can be changed? Sandra Does .Xdefaults-fqdn exist? If so, it read that instead, and that is the sensible behaviour; the name is more specific. Try renaming or deleting .Xdefaults-fqdn and see if it helps. Sorry, I should have mentioned before. As a consequence of xorg ignoring my .Xdefaults I've created .Xdefaults-fqdn and it's being used. That's not the problem. I'd like to change that behaviour though because pretty much all other Linux distros I've ever used before used .Xdefaults and most documentation you find about .Xdefaults entries point user to .Xdefaults in the homedir. Yeah I could create symlinks but I rather change it completely to .Xdefaults. I deploy a tarball with all my dotfiles on a Webserver and I don't want to rename .Xdefaults on every workstation I fetch the tarballs via script. I bet the search path of .Xdefaults is some sort of config option that can be changed somewhere. I tried searching in /usr/local/lib/X11, env startx, env xorg but no luck. Any idea where I can change it? Sandra ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Fwd: .bashrc
No Ubuntu, descomentar este trecho no /etc/bash.bashrc: if [ -f /etc/bash_completion ]; then . /etc/bash_completion fi e salvar o arquivo anexo como ~/.bashrc -- My preferred quotation of Robert Louis Stevenson is You cannot make an omelette without breaking eggs. Not because I like the omelettes, but because I like the sound of eggs being broken. .bashrc Description: Binary data ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: .Xdefaults ignored
On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 10:43:04 +0100 Sandra Kachelmann s.kachelm...@googlemail.com wrote: I bet the search path of .Xdefaults is some sort of config option that can be changed somewhere. I tried searching in /usr/local/lib/X11, env startx, env xorg but no luck. Any idea where I can change it? Do you use .xinitrc? I have this in mine: if [ -f ~/.Xdefaults ] xrdb ~/.Xdefaults --- Gary Jennejohn ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: .Xdefaults ignored
Sandra Kachelmann s.kachelm...@googlemail.com wrote: On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 5:53 PM, Chris Rees utis...@googlemail.com wrote: 2009/12/17 Sandra Kachelmann s.kachelm...@googlemail.com: I recently noticed that xorg under FreeBSD ignores my ~/.Xdefaults file. I saw with truss that instead .Xdefaults-fqdn is being used: open(/home/skmn/.Xdefaults-prissy.local,O_RDONLY,06362252327) = 5 (0x5) No trace about ~/.Xdefaults Any idea why and if it can be changed? Sandra Does .Xdefaults-fqdn exist? If so, it read that instead, and that is the sensible behaviour; the name is more specific. Try renaming or deleting .Xdefaults-fqdn and see if it helps. Sorry, I should have mentioned before. As a consequence of xorg ignoring my .Xdefaults I've created .Xdefaults-fqdn and it's being used. That's not the problem. I'd like to change that behaviour though because pretty much all other Linux distros I've ever used before used .Xdefaults and most documentation you find about .Xdefaults entries point user to .Xdefaults in the homedir. Yeah I could create symlinks but I rather change it completely to .Xdefaults. I deploy a tarball with all my dotfiles on a Webserver and I don't want to rename .Xdefaults on every workstation I fetch the tarballs via script. I bet the search path of .Xdefaults is some sort of config option that can be changed somewhere. I tried searching in /usr/local/lib/X11, env startx, env xorg but no luck. Any idea where I can change it? Just set the path in $XENVIRONMENT. For example: export XENVIRONMENT=$HOME/.Xdefaults Emanuel ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: MailScanner and Perl problems (FIXED)
Whooo! That's awesome! Big thanks to Julian, Mike and everyone else who helped with *finally* getting this sorted out. Kind regards, mog. Mike Jakubik wrote: Just wanted to mention to all the frustrated mailscanner users that have been having issues when updating perl, the problem has finally been fixed. I have submitted a pr to update the port, you will see this fix in version 4.79.4. The problem was caused by the way mailscanner code behaved when it was ran under perl's taint mode. Taint mode is triggered when changing the Run As options in mailscanner's config. If anyone is interested in updating their port now a diff can be found here http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=141726 . Many thanks to Julian for fixing this. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: FreeBSD Port: php5-mhash-5.2.11_1
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 09:46:25AM +0100, Alex Dupre wrote:
Simon Shapiro ha scritto:
Hey,
I just updated ports on a few machines and the CLI version of php dumps
its core rather than end nicely. The mhash module appears to be the
trigger (an extensions.ini with only mhash causes failure, all others
minus mhash: no failure).
Simply recompile security/mhash removing the following configure arg:
--with-LDFLAGS=${PTHREAD_LIBS}
I'm waiting approval from maintainer.
I've just committed this fix. Sorry for not reacting a bit sooner.
G'luck,
Peter
--
Peter Pentchev r...@ringlet.netr...@space.bgr...@freebsd.org
PGP key:http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc
Key fingerprint 2EE7 A7A5 17FC 124C F115 C354 651E EFB0 2527 DF13
If there were no counterfactuals, this sentence would not have been paradoxical.
pgpTqhh27Ixoq.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Re: ioquake3 support more platforms
Mark Linimon wrote: On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 04:48:43PM +0100, Dominic Fandrey wrote: A committer explained to me that he doesn't want to deal with SVN snapshot based ports. Is that a common attitude and what should I do to remedy this? Well, the problem is that we (FreeBSD) can't guarantee whether the contents of a resulting package are secure or not, or really, what the contents are at all. I personally would only be comfortable with a default setting of NO_PACKAGE in this case. Individual users could manually override it. But that's not different for any port. E.g. sysutils/bsdadminscripts is all mine, I create the distfiles and maintain the port, their is no guarantee that I don't do evil apart from me being quite certain that I don't. Why can one assume that an ioquake release is safe? One really cannot. It's made by the same people who maintain the non-trustworthy SVN. What if I created a sourceforge project freebsd-ioquake and published my distfiles there as ioquake freebsd releases. Would it suddenly turn trustworthy? Also it's a -devel port. That kinda screams At your own risk right into your face. I don't know if there is a formal policy about such ports. Probably, there ought to be. I think there can be no guarantee given for anything whatsoever. So I do not see how a policy could be useful. -- A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail? ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: ioquake3 support more platforms
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 12:31:38PM +0100, Dominic Fandrey wrote: But that's not different for any port. E.g. sysutils/bsdadminscripts is all mine, I create the distfiles and maintain the port, their is no guarantee that I don't do evil apart from me being quite certain that I don't. Sure there is. That's why we have ports committers. They are supposed to audit the changes to the port to make sure that the changes are safe. In particular, I expect that they check that the changes are not so extensive that they indicate the distributing system has been hacked. Why can one assume that an ioquake release is safe? One really cannot. It's made by the same people who maintain the non-trustworthy SVN. There's no such check as the above possible with checkouts from a source control system. You get whatever is on that box at time T. Also it's a -devel port. That kinda screams At your own risk right into your face. And NO_PACKAGES would further guarantee it. mcl ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: port devel/gobject-introspection fails to build on sparc
Hi, Anton! Anton Shterenlikht wrote: on FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT sparc64 port devel/gobject-introspection fails to build: Making all in gir gmake[2]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/devel/gobject-introspection/work/gobject-introspection-0.6.6/gir' ../tools/g-ir-compiler --includedir=. GLib-2.0.gir -o GLib-2.0.typelib gmake[2]: *** [GLib-2.0.typelib] Illegal instruction: 4 (core dumped) gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/devel/gobject-introspection/work/gobject-introspection-0.6.6/gir' gmake[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 Any advice? many thanks anton Try the attached patch on own risk. With Best Regards, Andrew Belashov. --- girepository/girnode.c.orig 2009-07-09 21:20:46.0 +0400 +++ girepository/girnode.c 2009-12-09 16:12:24.0 +0300 @@ -2288,7 +2288,8 @@ break; case GI_TYPE_TAG_DOUBLE: blob-size = sizeof (gdouble); - *(gdouble*)data[blob-offset] = (gdouble) parse_float_value (constant-value); + gdouble tmp = parse_float_value (constant-value); + memcpy (data[blob-offset], tmp, blob-size); break; case GI_TYPE_TAG_UTF8: case GI_TYPE_TAG_FILENAME: ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: ioquake3 support more platforms
Mark Linimon wrote: On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 12:31:38PM +0100, Dominic Fandrey wrote: But that's not different for any port. E.g. sysutils/bsdadminscripts is all mine, I create the distfiles and maintain the port, their is no guarantee that I don't do evil apart from me being quite certain that I don't. Sure there is. That's why we have ports committers. They are supposed to audit the changes to the port to make sure that the changes are safe. In particular, I expect that they check that the changes are not so extensive that they indicate the distributing system has been hacked. Are committers really supposed to read the code? I find that highly improbable, even for my shell scripts that only consist of a couple KBs of code. Why can one assume that an ioquake release is safe? One really cannot. It's made by the same people who maintain the non-trustworthy SVN. There's no such check as the above possible with checkouts from a source control system. You get whatever is on that box at time T. And I'm checking what those changes are to keep this stuff running on FreeBSD. The ioquake3 project doesn't hand commit right to everyone. Look at the e17 ports. Someone takes SVN snapshots, fixes them up for FreeBSD and bundles them as distfiles. It's exactly the same process I use for ioquake3, but no one thinks the ports are untrustworthy. Also it's a -devel port. That kinda screams At your own risk right into your face. And NO_PACKAGES would further guarantee it. I don't see that. But I see a lot of disadvantages. E.g. ioquake releases only occur every couple of years. Long before the next release occurs it might not make sense to maintain the last release, because it's simply depending on a lot of outdated infrastructure. Regards ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
INDEX build failed for 6.x
INDEX build failed with errors: Generating INDEX-6 - please wait..pkg_info: not found pkg_info: not found Done. make_index: fandango-0.2.6.1_3: no entry for /usr/ports/lang/python23 make_index: fandango-0.2.6.1_3: no entry for /usr/ports/lang/python23 Committers on the hook: demon fluffy kwm linimon miwi roam Most recent CVS update was: U MOVED U Mk/bsd.python.mk U audio/akode-plugins-mpc/Makefile U audio/akode-plugins-mpeg/Makefile U audio/akode-plugins-oss/Makefile U audio/akode-plugins-resampler/Makefile U audio/akode-plugins-xiph/Makefile U databases/p5-DBIx-SearchBuilder/Makefile U databases/p5-DBIx-SearchBuilder/distinfo U devel/p5-Proc-Simple/Makefile U devel/p5-Proc-Simple/distinfo U devel/p5-TimeDate/Makefile U devel/p5-TimeDate/distinfo U ftp/curl/Makefile U ftp/curl/files/patch-include__curl__curl.h U lang/Makefile U math/Makefile U net/tptest/Makefile U security/mhash/Makefile U www/epiphany/files/patch-lib_ephy-spell-check.c U www/p5-HTTP-Server-Simple-Mason/Makefile U www/p5-HTTP-Server-Simple-Mason/distinfo ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
www/epiphany (epiphany-2.28.1_1) Patch error on upgrade
Hi Just attempted to upgrade - console report follows: As title [Updating the pkgdb format:bdb_btree in /var/db/pkg ... - 1256 packages found (-0 +1) . done] --- Upgrading 'epiphany-2.28.1_1' to 'epiphany-2.28.2' (www/epiphany) --- Building '/usr/ports/www/epiphany' === Cleaning for epiphany-2.28.2 === Found saved configuration for epiphany-2.28.1_1 = epiphany-2.28.2.tar.bz2 doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/gnome2. = Attempting to fetch from ftp://ftp.belnet.be/mirror/ftp.gnome.org/sources/epiphany/2.28/. epiphany-2.28.2.tar.bz2 100% of 5563 kB 90 kBps 00m00s === Extracting for epiphany-2.28.2 = MD5 Checksum OK for gnome2/epiphany-2.28.2.tar.bz2. = SHA256 Checksum OK for gnome2/epiphany-2.28.2.tar.bz2. === Patching for epiphany-2.28.2 === Applying extra patch /usr/ports/www/epiphany/files/extra-patch- embed_ephy-embed-prefs.c === Applying FreeBSD patches for epiphany-2.28.2 Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch. 1 out of 1 hunks ignored--saving rejects to lib/ephy-spell-check.c.rej = Patch patch-lib_ephy-spell-check.c failed to apply cleanly. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/www/epiphany. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/www/epiphany. ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa /tmp/portupgrade20091218-67899-xf91yt-0 env UPGRADE_TOOL=portupgrade UPGRADE_PORT=epiphany-2.28.1_1 UPGRADE_PORT_VER=2.28.1_1 make ** Fix the problem and try again. ** Listing the failed packages (-:ignored / *:skipped / !:failed) - print/cups-pdf (marked as IGNORE) - textproc/urlview (marked as IGNORE) ! www/epiphany (epiphany-2.28.1_1) (patch error) dns1# ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: port devel/gobject-introspection fails to build on sparc
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 03:17:40PM +0300, Andrew Belashov wrote: Hi, Anton! Anton Shterenlikht wrote: on FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT sparc64 port devel/gobject-introspection fails to build: Making all in gir gmake[2]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/devel/gobject-introspection/work/gobject-introspection-0.6.6/gir' ../tools/g-ir-compiler --includedir=. GLib-2.0.gir -o GLib-2.0.typelib gmake[2]: *** [GLib-2.0.typelib] Illegal instruction: 4 (core dumped) gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/devel/gobject-introspection/work/gobject-introspection-0.6.6/gir' gmake[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 Any advice? many thanks anton Try the attached patch on own risk. With Best Regards, Andrew Belashov. --- girepository/girnode.c.orig 2009-07-09 21:20:46.0 +0400 +++ girepository/girnode.c2009-12-09 16:12:24.0 +0300 @@ -2288,7 +2288,8 @@ break; case GI_TYPE_TAG_DOUBLE: blob-size = sizeof (gdouble); - *(gdouble*)data[blob-offset] = (gdouble) parse_float_value (constant-value); + gdouble tmp = parse_float_value (constant-value); + memcpy (data[blob-offset], tmp, blob-size); break; case GI_TYPE_TAG_UTF8: case GI_TYPE_TAG_FILENAME: many thanks. But now fails here: env LPATH=.libs env PYTHONPATH=../..:../..:$PYTHONPATH UNINSTALLED_INTROSPECTIO N_SRCDIR=../.. UNINSTALLED_INTROSPECTION_BUILDDIR=../.. ../../tools/g-ir-scanner -v --add-include-path=../../gir --add-include-path=. \ --include=GObject-2.0 \ --libtool=/bin/sh /usr/local/bin/libtool \ --program=./barapp \ --namespace=BarApp \ --strip-prefix=Bar \ --nsversion=1.0 \ --pkg gobject-2.0 \ ./barapp.c ./barapp.h \ --output BarApp-1.0.gir ../../tools/g-ir-compiler --includedir=. --includedir=../../gir BarApp-1.0.gir - o BarApp-1.0.typelib ../../tools/g-ir-generate --includedir=. --includedir=../../gir annotation-1.0.t ypelib -o annotation-1.0.tgir ../../tools/g-ir-generate --includedir=. --includedir=../../gir drawable-1.0.typ elib -o drawable-1.0.tgir ../../tools/g-ir-generate --includedir=. --includedir=../../gir foo-1.0.typelib -o foo-1.0.tgir ** ERROR:ginfo.c:337:g_base_info_get_name: code should not be reached gmake[3]: *** [foo-1.0.tgir] Abort trap: 6 (core dumped) gmake[3]: *** Deleting file `foo-1.0.tgir' gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/devel/gobject-introspection/work/gobject -introspection-0.6.6/tests/scanner' gmake[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 -- Anton Shterenlikht Room 2.6, Queen's Building Mech Eng Dept Bristol University University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944 Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: ioquake3 support more platforms
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 01:43:20PM +0100, Dominic Fandrey wrote: Are committers really supposed to read the code? Yes. mcl ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: ioquake3 support more platforms
Mark Linimon wrote: On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 01:43:20PM +0100, Dominic Fandrey wrote: Are committers really supposed to read the code? Yes. So when I submitted ioquake3-1.36 I condemned some poor committer to read 366609 lines of code? ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
INDEX now builds successfully on 6.x
___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
mysql-connector-java50 port -- anyone still using it?
Hi, I'm the maintainer of the mysql-connector-java50 port, which was forked off from mysql-connector-java some years ago. As this port is now well behind the current mysql-connector-java at version 5.1.10, and it depends on JDK 1.4 or 1.5, I wonder how much use it is nowadays. Unless I hear otherwise, I'm minded to send in a PR to deprecate (and eventually remove) the port in the next few days. So, if this is something you rely upon, please speak now or forever hold your peace. If there's still any interest in keeping the port, I shall leave well alone. Cheers, Matthew -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: ioquake3 support more platforms
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 02:50:31PM +0100, Dominic Fandrey wrote: So when I submitted ioquake3-1.36 I condemned some poor committer to read 366609 lines of code? We expect them to test-install the initial code to make sure it's not malware. We expect them to scan the diffs to make sure the system isn't rooted. What's your alternate suggestion? Just let everyone commit whatever they want and hope for the best? mcl ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: ioquake3 support more platforms
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 02:50:31PM +0100, Dominic Fandrey wrote: So when I submitted ioquake3-1.36 I condemned some poor committer to read 366609 lines of code? We expect them to test-install the initial code to make sure it's not malware. We expect them to scan the diffs to make sure the system isn't rooted. What's your alternate suggestion? Just let everyone commit whatever they want and hope for the best? Aren't the two of you talking at cross-purposes here? It seems to me that the OP is looking for a way to update a port to a distfile created from a snapshot of project sources -- not in the sense of sources that are recreated each and every build by fetching a snapshot from a remote VCS, but an actual tarball that has been audited, checksummed, and uploaded to a project server. Surely this is needed for a few ports, including some now in the tree? Regards, b. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Need help with a port
--On Thursday, December 17, 2009 23:48:08 -0600 Nikola Lečić
nikola.le...@anthesphoria.net wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 21:58:21 -0600
Paul Schmehl pschmehl_li...@tx.rr.com wrote:
I'm the port maintainer for security/barnyard2. I submitted a port
upgrade a while ago, but the committer asked me to make a change
before he would approve it. I'm not sure what to do.
The source code, when it's extracted, sets the perms on install-sh to
r--r--r. This causes an error during the build. The way I tried to
resolve the issue was by adding this to the Makefile:
+pre-install:
+${CHMOD} 744 ${WRKSRC}/install-sh
+
The committer said that was the wrong way to do it, that I should
edit the configure file. But the configure file doesn't do anything
to the install-sh file at all.
I think this should actually be ${CHMOD} ${BINMODE}. I have a similar
thing in one of my ports: textproc/teckit. Besides install-sh, the
permissions of configure script itself had to be altered.
A simple grep for CHMOD and WRKSRC reveals a heap of ports doing such
things in ${WRKSRC}...
I see that now:
# grep -r install-sh * | grep WRKSRC | grep CHMOD
grep: security/base/work/base-php4/signatures: No such file or directory
archivers/par2cmdline-tbb/Makefile: @${CHMOD} u+x ${WRKSRC}/install-sh
audio/mhwaveedit/Makefile: @${CHMOD} +x ${WRKSRC}/install-sh
audio/gbemol/Makefile: @${CHMOD} a+x ${WRKSRC}/install-sh
biology/phyml/Makefile: ${CHMOD} a+x ${WRKSRC}/install-sh
chinese/fcitx/Makefile: @${CHMOD} 0755 ${WRKSRC}/install-sh
converters/libticonv/Makefile: @${CHMOD} 755 ${WRKSRC}/install-sh
deskutils/google-gadgets/Makefile: @cd ${WRKSRC} ${CHMOD} +x
autotools/install-sh
devel/acovea-gtk/Makefile: ${CHMOD} 755 ${WRKSRC}/install-sh
devel/rudeconfig/Makefile: ${CHMOD} 744 ${WRKSRC}/install-sh
devel/bennugd-core/Makefile:@${CHMOD} a+x ${WRKSRC}/configure
${WRKSRC}/install-sh
devel/bennugd-modules/Makefile: @${CHMOD} a+x ${WRKSRC}/configure
${WRKSRC}/install-sh
emulators/tiemu3/Makefile: ${CHMOD} +x ${WRKSRC}/install-sh
games/brutalchess/Makefile: ${CHMOD} 0755 ${WRKSRC}/install-sh
games/crossfire-server/Makefile:@${CHMOD} a+x ${WRKSRC}/utils/install-sh
games/daimonin-client/Makefile: @${CHMOD} a+x ${WRKSRC}/configure
${WRKSRC}/make_utils/install-sh
games/libfov/Makefile: @${CHMOD} ${BINMODE} ${WRKSRC}/install-sh
games/numptyphysics/Makefile: @${CHMOD} a+x ${WRKSRC}/install-sh
games/pipewalker/Makefile: @${CHMOD} a+x ${WRKSRC}/install-sh
japanese/mecab/Makefile:${CHMOD} a+x ${WRKSRC}/install-sh
math/pgcalc/Makefile: @${CHMOD} 755 ${WRKSRC}/skins/HP49G+
${WRKSRC}/admin/install-sh
misc/hello/Makefile:${CHMOD} a+x ${WRKSRC}/build-aux/install-sh
misc/talkfilters/Makefile: @${CHMOD} +x ${WRKSRC}/install-sh
multimedia/flvmeta/Makefile:${CHMOD} a+x ${WRKSRC}/install-sh
net/grsync/Makefile:@${CHMOD} u+x ${WRKSRC}/install-sh
net-im/trix/Makefile: ${CHMOD} 744 ${WRKSRC}/install-sh
net-p2p/dclib/Makefile: ${CHMOD} 0755 ${WRKSRC}/admin/install-sh
print/texinfo/Makefile: ${CHMOD} 755 ${WRKSRC}/build-aux/install-sh
security/barnyard2/patch-Makefile:+ ${CHMOD} 744 ${WRKSRC}/install-sh
security/barnyard2-devel.shar:X ${CHMOD} a+x ${WRKSRC}/install-sh
sysutils/duff/Makefile: ${CHMOD} +x ${WRKSRC}/install-sh
textproc/teckit/Makefile: ${CHMOD} ${BINMODE} ${WRKSRC}/configure
${WRKSRC}/install-sh
www/suphp/Makefile: @${CHMOD} 755 ${WRKSRC}/config/install-sh
x11/alltray/Makefile: @${CHMOD} +x ${WRKSRC}/install-sh
x11-wm/openbox/Makefile:@${CHMOD} +x ${WRKSRC}/install-sh
Two questions come to mind. 1) Is there any standardized way to do this?
(It's obvious it's not being done in a standard way) 2) Is there anyone with
the authority to tell me don't/do do it this way and not that way?
It looks like ${CHMOD} ${BINMODE} ${WRKSRC}/install-sh is the right way to do
it, but can someone confirm that? And can I finally get my update committed?
--
Paul Schmehl, Senior Infosec Analyst
As if it wasn't already obvious, my opinions
are my own and not those of my employer.
***
It is as useless to argue with those who have
renounced the use of reason as to administer
medication to the dead. Thomas Jefferson
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Need help with a port
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paul Schmehl wrote:
--On Thursday, December 17, 2009 23:48:08 -0600 Nikola Lečić
nikola.le...@anthesphoria.net wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 21:58:21 -0600
Paul Schmehl pschmehl_li...@tx.rr.com wrote:
I'm the port maintainer for security/barnyard2. I submitted a port
upgrade a while ago, but the committer asked me to make a change
before he would approve it. I'm not sure what to do.
The source code, when it's extracted, sets the perms on install-sh to
r--r--r. This causes an error during the build. The way I tried to
resolve the issue was by adding this to the Makefile:
+pre-install:
+${CHMOD} 744 ${WRKSRC}/install-sh
+
The committer said that was the wrong way to do it, that I should
edit the configure file. But the configure file doesn't do anything
to the install-sh file at all.
I think this should actually be ${CHMOD} ${BINMODE}. I have a similar
thing in one of my ports: textproc/teckit. Besides install-sh, the
permissions of configure script itself had to be altered.
A simple grep for CHMOD and WRKSRC reveals a heap of ports doing such
things in ${WRKSRC}...
I see that now:
# grep -r install-sh * | grep WRKSRC | grep CHMOD
grep: security/base/work/base-php4/signatures: No such file or directory
archivers/par2cmdline-tbb/Makefile: @${CHMOD} u+x ${WRKSRC}/install-sh
audio/mhwaveedit/Makefile: @${CHMOD} +x ${WRKSRC}/install-sh
[...]
Two questions come to mind. 1) Is there any standardized way to do
this? (It's obvious it's not being done in a standard way) 2) Is there
anyone with the authority to tell me don't/do do it this way and not
that way?
It looks like ${CHMOD} ${BINMODE} ${WRKSRC}/install-sh is the right
way to do it, but can someone confirm that? And can I finally get my
update committed?
Hi Paul,
make -V BINMODE returns 555, so as long as you're OK with those
permissions, I would say using the ${BINMODE} macro is preferable.
Otherwise, there's no issue with you using the correct permissions value
(755, +x, etc.) for your situation.
If you're having difficulty getting your port committed because you have
a construct that is used in many other ports, I think you can ask for
portmgr's opinion. They will certainly resolve the issue for you.
IMHO, I don't see any problem with what you're doing.
If your committer has not responded to you in some number of weeks, you
can also ask portmgr to reassign the port back to the pool or to another
willing committer.
Hope that helps,
Greg
- --
Greg Larkin
http://www.FreeBSD.org/ - The Power To Serve
http://www.sourcehosting.net/ - Ready. Set. Code.
http://twitter.com/sourcehosting/ - Follow me, follow you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iD8DBQFLLAvv0sRouByUApARAqPJAJwOkaJN+CD9fMsFPGuyWAnmlYgzHQCdGrPL
PKyGTYAHmUpAHF0rr7yyLEU=
=Rn1j
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
INDEX build failed for 6.x
INDEX build failed with errors: Generating INDEX-6 - please wait..pkg_info: not found pkg_info: not found Done. make_index: neonpp-0.3_1: no entry for /usr/ports/www/neon26 make_index: neonpp-0.3_1: no entry for /usr/ports/www/neon26 Committers on the hook: beat miwi pav Most recent CVS update was: U MOVED U audio/exaile/Makefile U devel/ocaml-event/Makefile U devel/ocaml-event/distinfo U devel/pear-PEAR_PackageFileManager/Makefile U devel/pear-PEAR_PackageFileManager/distinfo U irc/znc/Makefile U irc/znc/distinfo U irc/znc/pkg-plist U lang/sdcc-devel/Makefile U lang/sdcc-devel/distinfo U lang/sdcc-devel/pkg-plist U lang/sdcc-devel/files/patch-device-lib-Makefile.in U mail/mailscanner/Makefile U mail/mailscanner/distinfo U mail/mailscanner/files/pkg-message.in U mail/thunderbird3/Makefile U multimedia/abby/Makefile U multimedia/abby/distinfo U multimedia/audacious-plugins/Makefile U multimedia/cclive/Makefile U multimedia/cclive/distinfo U multimedia/clive/Makefile U multimedia/clive/distinfo U multimedia/clive/pkg-plist U net-mgmt/noc/Makefile U net-mgmt/noc/distinfo U net-mgmt/noc/pkg-plist U net-mgmt/wifimgr/Makefile U net-mgmt/wifimgr/distinfo U sysutils/nut/Makefile U sysutils/nut22/Makefile U www/Makefile U www/mod_security/Makefile U www/mod_security/distinfo U www/nanoblogger-extra/Makefile U www/nanoblogger-extra/pkg-plist U www/pear-HTTP_Request2/Makefile U www/pear-HTTP_Request2/distinfo U www/pear-Services_Facebook/Makefile U www/pear-Services_Facebook/distinfo U www/pecl-http/Makefile U www/pecl-http/distinfo U www/xpi-downthemall/Makefile U x11-wm/matwm2/Makefile U x11-wm/matwm2/distinfo ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Need help with a port
--On December 18, 2009 5:10:39 PM -0600 Greg Larkin glar...@freebsd.org
wrote:
Hi Paul,
make -V BINMODE returns 555, so as long as you're OK with those
permissions, I would say using the ${BINMODE} macro is preferable.
Otherwise, there's no issue with you using the correct permissions value
(755, +x, etc.) for your situation.
If you're having difficulty getting your port committed because you have
a construct that is used in many other ports, I think you can ask for
portmgr's opinion. They will certainly resolve the issue for you.
IMHO, I don't see any problem with what you're doing.
If your committer has not responded to you in some number of weeks, you
can also ask portmgr to reassign the port back to the pool or to another
willing committer.
My committer asked:
Why is necessary chmod to 755? Why need it?
I answered:
Because the install-sh script has incorrect permissions and generates an
error if you don't set them correctly.
The committer submitted my response to another person who wrote:
I'm sorry that's the wrong way to fix that, the premission problem come
from the configure script, run in the same problem a year ago. Check
games/wormux-devel there is a fix for the same problem maybe you can
take the same way.
I asked for clarification about a month ago. I looked at the port he
referred to, but I don't see how it applies to my situation. So I stated
that and asked for help. None has been forthcoming, but I haven't pushed
it either. I know everyone is busy. I certainly am. And we're all
volunteers as well. So, I'm not complaining. I just want to understand
what the right way is to solve this particular problem and get the port
committed.
I've cc'd both of them as well as portmgr. I'll do whatever I'm told to
do.
Paul Schmehl, If it isn't already
obvious, my opinions are my own
and not those of my employer.
**
WARNING: Check the headers before replying
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
HG repo of wip and outcast ports
Hi! FYI: I've created public mercurial repo with ports that have been removed from the ports tree due to license considerations (games from Parallel Realities, ion3), as well as some WIP ports (0 A.D., Blood Frontier) and some ports not really worth adding to the tree (though still interesting). If you're interested in some of these ports, feel free to use it. http://hg.amdmi3.ru/ports/ - works both in browser and for `hg clone` -- Dmitry Marakasov . 55B5 0596 FF1E 8D84 5F56 9510 D35A 80DD F9D2 F77D amd...@amdmi3.ru ..: jabber: amd...@jabber.ruhttp://www.amdmi3.ru ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
INDEX build failed for 6.x
INDEX build failed with errors: Generating INDEX-6 - please wait..pkg_info: not found pkg_info: not found Done. make_index: neonpp-0.3_1: no entry for /usr/ports/www/neon26 make_index: neonpp-0.3_1: no entry for /usr/ports/www/neon26 Committers on the hook: beat marcus miwi pav wen Most recent CVS update was: U databases/pecl-mongo/Makefile U databases/pecl-mongo/distinfo U devel/py-odfpy/Makefile U devel/py-odfpy/distinfo U graphics/eog/Makefile U graphics/eog/distinfo U graphics/eog/pkg-plist U net-im/centerim-devel/Makefile U net-im/centerim-devel/distinfo U sysutils/gnome-system-tools/Makefile U sysutils/gnome-system-tools/distinfo U sysutils/gnome-system-tools/pkg-plist ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
INDEX build failed for 6.x
INDEX build failed with errors: Generating INDEX-6 - please wait..pkg_info: not found pkg_info: not found Done. make_index: neonpp-0.3_1: no entry for /usr/ports/www/neon26 make_index: neonpp-0.3_1: no entry for /usr/ports/www/neon26 Committers on the hook: beat marcus miwi nemoliu pav wen Most recent CVS update was: U games/gnome-games/Makefile U games/gnome-games/distinfo U games/gnome-games/pkg-plist U java/jakarta-commons-dbcp/Makefile U x11/gdm/Makefile U x11/gdm/distinfo U x11/gdm/pkg-plist U x11/gdm/files/patch-gui_simple-greeter_gdm-user.c U x11/gdm/files/patch-hal-keyboard.2 U x11/gnome-desktop/Makefile U x11/gnome-desktop/distinfo U x11/gnome-desktop/pkg-plist ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: portupgrade failure
Adam McDougall wrote: Some of that sounds true to my experience, for a while I've noticed while installing a new port with portupgrade that it will install the default dependencies before prompting with the options screen to find out which ones I want. For example if I do 'portupgrade -N postfix' on a fresh system, it will first install pcre and THEN prompt me to (de)select pcre or any of the other optional deps. If I may, I'd like to suggest that users who are not happy with the current status of portupgrade give portmaster a try. Now that it has support for installing from packages it's fairly comparable to portupgrade in terms of features, and I think that for most users it will meet your needs quite nicely. It does some things differently than portupgrade, and I suggest that new users read through the man page and use the -v option for a while to get familiar with it. I'd also like to point out that portmaster does not suffer from the particular problem described here. By default it runs through all of the OPTIONS dialogs recursively before it starts building or installing anything so you never spend time installing things you don't want or need. Of course, if you're satisfied with portupgrade I encourage you to stick with it! I don't regard portmaster as being in competition with any of the other tools, they all have their strong and weak points. hth, Doug -- Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with a domain name makeover!http://SupersetSolutions.com/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
