Here's an (inlined) patch to fix mrxvt-devel after the move to utmpx.
The maintainer (lme@) copied per Cc.
--- Makefile.orig 2010-01-15 12:23:35.0 +0100
+++ Makefile2010-01-15 12:27:54.0 +0100
@@ -37,6 +37,10 @@
.include bsd.port.pre.mk
+.if ${OSVERSION} = 97
This is on FreeBSD 6.3/i386:
--- Upgrading 'mDNSResponder-108' to 'mDNSResponder-214'
(net/mDNSResponder)
--- Building '/usr/ports/net/mDNSResponder'
=== Cleaning for mDNSResponder-214
=== Extracting for mDNSResponder-214
= MD5 Checksum OK for mDNSResponder-214.tar.gz.
= SHA256 Checksum OK
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 12:43:18PM +0100, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
Here's an (inlined) patch to fix mrxvt-devel after the move to utmpx.
The maintainer (lme@) copied per Cc.
--- Makefile.orig 2010-01-15 12:23:35.0 +0100
+++ Makefile 2010-01-15 12:27:54.0 +0100
@@ -37,6
I run rdiff-backup on my backup server:
- FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE AMD64
- rdiff-backup-1.2.8,1
- python25-2.5.4_3
- be pro quad
- 4G Ram
I try to rdiff a folder on a nfs ro mounted volume to an other volume.
I obtain this error : OverflowError: signed integer is greater than
maximum
I have the same
Hi
I want to be able to permit ssh access to servers over the internet in a way
that limits that access to specific hardware (i.e. laptops with known hardware
configurations and devices). So I am looking for some additional layer of
security on top of the normal private key certificate system
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 1:14 AM, RW rwmailli...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Thu, 14 Jan 2010 19:04:29 -0500
Greg Larkin glar...@freebsd.org wrote:
The CVS commit in question says that the breakage was reported by
pointyhat (FreeBSD package building cluster):
Hi,
sorry for the long story following but I think this is important to get
the picture ;)
I had the following setup:
2 harddisks ada0, ada1 mirrored with gmirror as gm0
1 2.7TB twa-RAID as da0
the da0p1 partition had a gjournal on gm0s1fh
the gm0s1f partition had a gjournal on gm0s1fg
I
Oliver Lehmann wrote:
[some stuff]
I picked the wrong list, sorry for the noise...
--
Oliver Lehmann
http://www.pofo.de/
http://wishlist.ans-netz.de/
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 1:14 AM, RW rwmailli...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Thu, 14 Jan 2010 19:04:29 -0500
Greg Larkin glar...@freebsd.org wrote:
The CVS commit in question says that the breakage was reported by
Oliver Lehmann wrote:
Hi,
sorry for the long story following but I think this is important to get
the picture ;)
I had the following setup:
2 harddisks ada0, ada1 mirrored with gmirror as gm0
1 2.7TB twa-RAID as da0
the da0p1 partition had a gjournal on gm0s1fh
the gm0s1f
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 09:32:32PM -0500, jhell wrote:
Hi Doug,
Recently in upgrading x11-wm/xmonad and x11-wm/xmonad-contrib I had
noticed that when portmaster asks to delete a distfile, when it asks about
xmonad-0.9.1 it was also asking to delete the xmonad-contrib-0.9.1 before
it
Hi Doug,
Recently in upgrading x11-wm/xmonad and x11-wm/xmonad-contrib I had
noticed that when portmaster asks to delete a distfile, when it asks about
xmonad-0.9.1 it was also asking to delete the xmonad-contrib-0.9.1 before
it had even upgraded xmonad-contrib. Is this a problem on
I upgrade to python26 by following the 20090608 entry
in /usr/ports/UPDATING.
I'm now on : python26-2.6.4, rdiff-backup-1.2.8,1
But I still have the same error :
OverflowError: signed integer is greater than
On Fri, 15 Jan 2010 22:23, wxs@ wrote:
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 09:32:32PM -0500, jhell wrote:
Hi Doug,
Recently in upgrading x11-wm/xmonad and x11-wm/xmonad-contrib I had
noticed that when portmaster asks to delete a distfile, when it asks about
xmonad-0.9.1 it was also asking to delete the
On 1/15/2010 6:32 PM, jhell wrote:
Hi Doug,
Recently in upgrading x11-wm/xmonad and x11-wm/xmonad-contrib I had
noticed that when portmaster asks to delete a distfile, when it asks
about xmonad-0.9.1 it was also asking to delete the xmonad-contrib-0.9.1
before it had even upgraded
15 matches
Mail list logo
