On 29/03/2010 17:57, Ivan Voras wrote:
One way to do it, my proposal, would be to maintain a stable overlay
of the ports, one for each major supported branch (i.e. 6.x, 7.x, 8.x),
containing ports deemed important for some reason.
Who would be doing the additional work? I figure we'd need
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 3:57 PM, eculp ec...@encontacto.net wrote:
Quoting Ivan Voras ivo...@freebsd.org:
Doug Hardie wrote:
On 29 March 2010, at 08:57, Ivan Voras wrote:
In some cases the burdens are obvious - the maintainer(s) would need to
e.g. maintain three versions of the ports - a
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 11:35 AM, Ivan Voras ivo...@freebsd.org wrote:
Alexey Shuvaev wrote:
One way to do it, my proposal, would be to maintain a stable overlay
of the ports, one for each major supported branch (i.e. 6.x, 7.x, 8.x),
containing ports deemed important for some reason.
What
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 12:49 PM, Ivan Voras ivo...@freebsd.org wrote:
Doug Hardie wrote:
On 29 March 2010, at 08:57, Ivan Voras wrote:
In some cases the burdens are obvious - the maintainer(s) would need to
e.g. maintain three versions of the ports - a random example would be
e.g. X.Org
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 12:26 AM, Garrett Cooper yanef...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 12:18 AM, Garrett Cooper yanef...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 11:35 AM, Ivan Voras ivo...@freebsd.org wrote:
Alexey Shuvaev wrote:
One way to do it, my proposal, would be to
Am 30.03.2010 09:30, schrieb Garrett Cooper:
If this is really slick and tinderbox / whatever tools is doing its
job and no PRs have been reported for X number of days on a given port
(would require tie-ins to GNATS, or whatever), perhaps it would be
nice if ports were automatically
Am 30.03.2010 09:18, schrieb Garrett Cooper:
There is one important note to make:
Many times you're forced to upgrade packages because of ABI breakages,
etc. What would happen if there was a CVE assigned for PNG tomorrow
(like there was for JPEG a year and change ago) where mass changes
On Tue 30 Mar 2010 at 04:55:01 PDT Matthias Andree wrote:
I don't think this proposal is useful. Technically it would work, but socially
it wouldn't. Why? RELENG_* tagging would require that port maintainers oversee
the implications for all supported FreeBSD releases, possibly run tinderboxen
c++ -c -pipe -g -g -g -I../../include/Qt -I../../include -D_REENTRANT
-I/usr/local/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/local/lib/glib-2.0/include -g
-fvisibility=hidden -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -Wall -W
-I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include/freetype2 -fPIC -DQT_SHARED
-DQT_BUILD_GUI_LIB
Hallo Doug Barton,
I can not reproduce this.
The upstream code contains support for libpngi 1.4
#FreeBSD: ports/x11-toolkits/qt4-gui/Makefile,v 1.30 2010/03/28 06:47:25 dinoex
Exp $
kind regards Dirk
- Dirk Meyer, Im Grund 4, 34317 Habichtswald, Germany
-
On Tue, 30 Mar 2010, Doug Barton wrote:
c++ -c -pipe -g -g -g -I../../include/Qt -I../../include -D_REENTRANT
-I/usr/local/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/local/lib/glib-2.0/include -g
-fvisibility=hidden -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -Wall -W
-I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include/freetype2 -fPIC
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 01:05:39AM +0400, Eir Nym wrote:
I work on creating system for system and ports autobuilder with custom
settings for my FreeBSD machines. I know about many programs, which do
same, but I don't like strange depends, which are not controlled by
OPTIONS and some another
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2010/03/30 12:22, Doug Barton wrote:
Testing it again I see that I didn't go far enough up to find the real
error, sorry Dirk.
The actual problem seems to be with zlib.h. This is from qt4-gui:
[...]
-DQ_INTERNAL_QAPP_SRC -DQT_CORE_LIB
I can't comment intelligently on whether or not the fix below is
correct, but with it, qt4-qmake compiles. I'll move on to try
recompiling the rest of qt4.
Doug
On 03/30/10 12:32, Xin LI wrote:
On 2010/03/30 12:22, Doug Barton wrote:
Testing it again I see that I didn't go far enough up to
--
With pleasure
On 30 Mar 2010, at 23:14, Alexey Shuvaev shuv...@physik.uni-wuerzburg.de
wrote:
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 01:05:39AM +0400, Eir Nym wrote:
I work on creating system for system and ports autobuilder with
custom
settings for my FreeBSD machines. I know about many programs,
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 1:25 PM, Arseny Nasokin eir...@gmail.com wrote:
--
With pleasure
On 30 Mar 2010, at 23:14, Alexey Shuvaev shuv...@physik.uni-wuerzburg.de
wrote:
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 01:05:39AM +0400, Eir Nym wrote:
I work on creating system for system and ports autobuilder
On 31 Mar 2010, at 00:49, Garrett Cooper yanef...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 1:25 PM, Arseny Nasokin eir...@gmail.com
wrote:
--
With pleasure
On 30 Mar 2010, at 23:14, Alexey Shuvaev shuv...@physik.uni-wuerzburg.de
wrote:
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 01:05:39AM +0400, Eir
There is an opennms port at: http://www.geeklan.co.uk/files/opennms/
however, it is a little dated.
I have attached a version that works for opennms 1.6.10 (at least it
worked for me with make install, after I uploaded the java dependencies
in /usr/ports/distfiles )
Attached is a tar ball of
On Wednesday 31 March 2010 06:32:33 Xin LI wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2010/03/30 12:22, Doug Barton wrote:
Testing it again I see that I didn't go far enough up to find the real
error, sorry Dirk.
The actual problem seems to be with zlib.h. This is from
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 1:54 PM, Arseny Nasokin eir...@gmail.com wrote:
On 31 Mar 2010, at 00:49, Garrett Cooper yanef...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 1:25 PM, Arseny Nasokin eir...@gmail.com wrote:
On 30 Mar 2010, at 23:14, Alexey Shuvaev
shuv...@physik.uni-wuerzburg.de
wrote:
On 31 Mar 2010, at 04:14, Garrett Cooper yanef...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 1:54 PM, Arseny Nasokin eir...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 31 Mar 2010, at 00:49, Garrett Cooper yanef...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 1:25 PM, Arseny Nasokin eir...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 30 Mar
On 03/30/10 21:36, Arseny Nasokin wrote:
I don't clearly understand, will be ports system removed?
At this time all discussion is theoretical. LONG before we make any
actual changes the users will have a chance to chime in, and will be
notified if any actual changes are made.
Doug
--
22 matches
Mail list logo
