FreeBSD unmaintained ports which are currently marked broken

2010-06-10 Thread linimon
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically notify users of ports that are marked as broken in their Makefiles. In many cases these ports are failing to compile on some subset of the FreeBSD build environments. The most common

FreeBSD ports which are currently marked broken

2010-06-10 Thread linimon
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically notify users of ports that are marked as broken in their Makefiles. In many cases these ports are failing to compile on some subset of the FreeBSD build environments. The most common

FreeBSD unmaintained ports which are currently scheduled for deletion

2010-06-10 Thread linimon
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically schedule removal of ports that have been judged to have outlived their usefulness. Often, this is due to a better alternative having become available and/or the cessation of development on

FreeBSD ports which are currently scheduled for deletion

2010-06-10 Thread linimon
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically schedule removal of ports that have been judged to have outlived their usefulness. Often, this is due to a better alternative having become available and/or the cessation of development on

FreeBSD ports which are currently marked forbidden

2010-06-10 Thread linimon
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically notify users about ports that are marked as forbidden in their Makefiles. Often, these ports are so marked due to security concerns, such as known exploits. An overview of each port,

FreeBSD Port: gwhois-20100515

2010-06-10 Thread Frank Reid
I've been running gwhois for a long time, but recently it stopped working due to a missing dependency on p5-Net-LibIDN-0.12. The port doesn't appear to recognize that perl module is needed. Thanks for maintaining the port. ___

Re: FreeBSD ports which are currently scheduled for deletion

2010-06-10 Thread Sevan / Venture37
On 10 June 2010 08:26, lini...@freebsd.org wrote: portname:           sysutils/dtc description:        A hosting web GUI for admin and accounting all hosting                    services maintainer:         tho...@goirand.fr status:             BROKEN deprecated because: has been broken for

Re: FreeBSD ports which are currently scheduled for deletion

2010-06-10 Thread Dominic Fandrey
On 10/06/2010 09:26, lini...@freebsd.org wrote: portname: java/eclipse-emf description:Eclipse Modeling Framework maintainer: freebsd-ecli...@freebsd.org deprecated because: This plugin can be installed from within eclipse via the updater

Re: FreeBSD ports which are currently marked broken

2010-06-10 Thread Kurt Jaeger
portname: java/dbvis broken because: does not fetch build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=javaportname=dbvis See http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=147493 Already approved by maintainer, waiting for

Re: Proposal to kill a port, devel/freelibiberty

2010-06-10 Thread James P. Howard, II
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 6/9/10 11:38 PM, Philip M. Gollucci wrote: On 06/09/10 02:23, James P. Howard, II wrote: As the library is not used by anything, I propose removing it. I will remove it shortly. Thank you, Phil. - -- James P. Howard, II, MPA MBCS CGFM

bsd.licenses.mk: where is or any later version construct?

2010-06-10 Thread Anonymous
One of my ports have this in its source header * GNU LGPL information * * * This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or * modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public * License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either *

Re: bsd.licenses.mk: where is or any later version construct?

2010-06-10 Thread Alberto Villa
On Thursday 10 June 2010 17:39:52 Anonymous wrote: but it doesn't work. I've figured this will work LICENSE= LGPL21 LGPL3 LICENSE_COMB= dual Is this correct usage or I'm missing smth? that's what you're supposed to do, as far as i understand while here, i have a similar problem: i

amavisd-new does not compile because of db42

2010-06-10 Thread Helmut Schneider
Hi, I cannot compile amavisd-new because db42 is not recognized as already installed: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=147718 As stated in the (unfortunately closed) PR I already removed all packages and tried from scratch but it still fails. The point is that the following ports

lang/cmucl broken on amd64?

2010-06-10 Thread C. P. Ghost
Hello Martin, *, the port lang/cmucl has a dependency on a very old libutil, libc and libm: % lisp /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object libutil.so.5 not found, required by lisp % which lisp /usr/local/bin/lisp % ldd `which lisp` /usr/local/bin/lisp: libutil.so.5 = not found (0x0)

Re: amavisd-new does not compile because of db42

2010-06-10 Thread Gabor Kovesdan
Helmut 'Ingrid' Schneider wrote: I cannot compile amavisd-new because db42 is not recognized as already installed: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=147718 As stated in the (unfortunately closed) PR I already removed all packages and tried from scratch but it still fails.

Re: lang/cmucl broken on amd64?

2010-06-10 Thread Martin Cracauer
Douglas Thrift wrote on Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 02:27:25PM -0700: Hello, I've run into this before and it seems to me like the port should actually depend on misc/compat6x. I emailed Martin about this a while back, but never received any reply. Apparently there is even an open bug for this:

Re: amavisd-new does not compile because of db42

2010-06-10 Thread Helmut Schneider
Gabor Kovesdan wrote: Helmut 'Ingrid' Schneider wrote: I cannot compile amavisd-new because db42 is not recognized as already installed: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=147718 As stated in the (unfortunately closed) PR I already removed all packages and

Re: lang/cmucl broken on amd64?

2010-06-10 Thread Douglas Thrift
Hello, I've run into this before and it seems to me like the port should actually depend on misc/compat6x. I emailed Martin about this a while back, but never received any reply. Apparently there is even an open bug for this: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/146680 Hope this

Re: lang/cmucl broken on amd64?

2010-06-10 Thread C. P. Ghost
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 11:27 PM, Douglas Thrift douglas...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I've run into this before and it seems to me like the port should actually depend on misc/compat6x. I emailed Martin about this a while back, but never received any reply. Apparently there is even an open bug

Re: amavisd-new does not compile because of db42

2010-06-10 Thread Helmut Schneider
Helmut 'Ingrid' Schneider wrote: I cannot compile amavisd-new because db42 is not recognized as already installed: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=147718 As stated in the (unfortunately closed) PR I already removed all packages and tried from scratch but it still fails. Might