On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 5:27 PM, Matthew Seaman
wrote:
> However naively incrementing the shlib version in the
> databases/postgresql84-server Makefile doesn't work:
>
> ===> Configuring for postgresql-server-8.4.4_2
> checking build system type... amd64-portbld-freebsd8.1
> checking host system t
On Fri, 9 Jul 2010, Shaun Amott wrote:
Indeed, part of the problem is burn-out. We recruit committers, and then
their activity tapers off (I'm guilty of this myself). Part of this, I
believe, is down to the effort involved in maintaining a useful
(up-to-date) testing environment -- hence my advo
devel/icu4 was recently updated and now installs shlibs with ABI version
44. Unfortunately this hasn't been propagated to those ports with a
LIB_DEPENDS on devel/icu4 (all three of them):
worm:/usr/ports:% grep -r 'icu.*\.43:' .
./databases/postgresql90-server/Makefile:LIB_DEPENDS+=
icudata.43:$
On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 10:51:01PM +0200, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
> > Ok - but how do we define "experienced"? Someone who has submitted 100
> > PORTVERSION++ PRs? I'm not convinced we have enough contributors who are
> > experienced enough to be given commit rights, but not contributing
> > enough
On 09/07/2010 22:00, Shaun Amott wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 07:37:11PM +0200, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
>>
>> On 09/07/2010 19:25, Shaun Amott wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 06:15:58PM +0200, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
To solve this problem with the current organization, my guess is
>>
> I went to http://soprano.sourceforge.net and founf the following:
>
> Soprano 2.4.4 released
> Wed, 06/30/2010 - 20:20 - trueg
> Soprano 2.4.4 is a bugfix release - probably the last one before the release
> of Soprano 2.5. It features the following changes:
>
> Fix to FindIODBC.cmake which en
On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 07:37:11PM +0200, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
>
> On 09/07/2010 19:25, Shaun Amott wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 06:15:58PM +0200, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
> >>
> >> To solve this problem with the current organization, my guess is
> >> that between 15 and 30 new active commit
hello .. i can't build kde4 on my tinderbox because
'graphics/djvulibre-nox11' port .. here is my PR .. hope some FBSDD
can solve this .. thanks
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=147650
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.fr
hello .. i can't build kde4 on my tinderbox because
'graphics/djvulibre-nox11' port .. here is my PR .. hope some FBSDD
can solve this .. thanks
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=147650
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.fr
On 07/09/10 05:27, John Baldwin wrote:
> (I used etcmerge as a template.)
BTW, I forgot to take this opportunity to insert my traditional rant
about "this is why I'm so pedantic when it comes to removing bad code
from existing ports." :) They get used as examples, and in this case
John made a pe
On 07/09/10 05:27, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Thursday, July 08, 2010 6:12:39 pm Doug Barton wrote:
>> On Thu, 8 Jul 2010, John Baldwin wrote:
>>
>>> This is a port for yet-another-/etc-merging tool that I wrote recently.
> It
>>> passes portlint -N with one bogus warning because /etc is in the com
On 09/07/2010 19:25, Shaun Amott wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 06:15:58PM +0200, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
>>
>> To solve this problem with the current organization, my guess is
>> that between 15 and 30 new active committers are required.
>> Because I don't think this is easily achieved I want to
On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 06:15:58PM +0200, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
>
> To solve this problem with the current organization, my guess is
> that between 15 and 30 new active committers are required.
> Because I don't think this is easily achieved I want to suggest
> a different approach. And I expect
On 09/07/2010 18:26, Chris Rees wrote:
> I think the people you describe as 'experienced' maintainers tend to be made
> committers anyway, or that's as far as I know.
What gives you that impression? ~180 committers that have been
active within the last 12 months (as in at least one commit), are
cu
On 09/07/2010 18:50, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> On Fri, 09 Jul 2010 18:15:58 +0200
> Dominic Fandrey wrote:
>
>> Currently the PR load is obviously too high for the committer team
>> to deal with. From a maintainer perspective this is rather painful,
>> I have currently stopped updating all my ports
On Fri, 09 Jul 2010 18:15:58 +0200
Dominic Fandrey wrote:
> Currently the PR load is obviously too high for the committer team
> to deal with. From a maintainer perspective this is rather painful,
> I have currently stopped updating all my ports, because I want
> pending updates committed first a
I think the people you describe as 'experienced' maintainers tend to be made
committers anyway, or that's as far as I know. There's little to be gained
by putting another rank of responsibility in, especially when a commit to
any port can cause huge wreckage; INDEX building, circular dependencies e
I think the people you describe as 'experienced' maintainers tend to be made
committers anyway, or that's as far as I know. There's little to be gained
by putting another rank of responsibility in, especially when a commit to
any port can cause huge wreckage; INDEX building, circular dependencies e
Currently the PR load is obviously too high for the committer team
to deal with. From a maintainer perspective this is rather painful,
I have currently stopped updating all my ports, because I want
pending updates committed first and also want to avoid running into
PR dependencies (ioquake3, openar
--On Thursday, July 08, 2010 15:39:09 -0500 Paul Schmehl
wrote:
Building CXX object agents/ontologies/CMakeFiles/niefast.dir/nmo.o
Linking CXX static library ../../lib/libniefast.a
[ 40%] Built target niefast
gmake: *** [all] Error 2
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/ports/deskutils/kdepim4-runti
On Thursday, July 08, 2010 6:12:39 pm Doug Barton wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Jul 2010, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> > This is a port for yet-another-/etc-merging tool that I wrote recently.
It
> > passes portlint -N with one bogus warning because /etc is in the comment.
>
> I didn't try installing/deinstall
Hello Ollivier,
Could you update devel/mercurial to version 1.6 (released 2010-07-01)?
Thanks!
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...
Hello everyone.
I'm getting kernel panics everytime I try to write a file to samba share
which is a fuse mount.
I tried samba 3.0.37, 3.3.13, 3.4.8, no difference.
Tried on 8.0-RELEASE, on today's 8.1-PRERELEASE.
How to reproduce:
1. Install /usr/ports/net/samba34, /usr/ports/sysutils/fusefs-u
Hi,
are there any plans to update x11-toolkits/py-wxPython28* to a version
which support cairo (2.8.9.0 or higher?)
I could send in a patch myself...
Regards,
Rene
--
http://www.rene-ladan.nl/
GPG fingerprint = E738 5471 D185 7013 0EE0 4FC8 3C1D 6F83 12E1 84F6
(subkeys.pgp.net)
Note that we still ask our committers to avoid sweepting commits until
after the release is officially out the door ... just in case.
mcl
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, s
25 matches
Mail list logo
