On Tue, 2010-07-20 at 09:31 +0100, David Southwell wrote:
To port maintainer
I posted the following on freebsd-ports last week but so far no response.
Just
wondered if you could shed any light on the following failure:
(Thanks in advance for any help)
David
applyTestPatches:
On 20/07/2010 11:46, Craig Butler wrote:
On Tue, 2010-07-20 at 09:31 +0100, David Southwell wrote:
To port maintainer
I posted the following on freebsd-ports last week but so far no response.
Just
wondered if you could shed any light on the following failure:
(Thanks in advance for any
The patch could possibly solve my challenge, but if it works then why do I
get this?
r...@anchorage:/usr/ports/lang/perl5.12# patch my.patch
Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--
|--- files/patch-freebsd.sh 2009-01-13
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 07:37:37 -0700
Scott Sanbeg ssan...@gmail.com wrote:
The patch could possibly solve my challenge, but if it works then why do I
get this?
r...@anchorage:/usr/ports/lang/perl5.12# patch my.patch
Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
I use portmaster on a build machine to make packages, copying /var/db/ports,
and /usr/local/etc/ports.conf to all clients, and NFS mounting /usr/ports on
the clients.
Following UPDATING to do the perl upgrade on the build machine worked fine.
When I go to any of the clients, it seems portmaster
On Tuesday 20 Jul 2010 00:14:47 Chris Rees wrote:
I'll have a look on Thursday for you.
that's great, thanks chris.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
On Jul 19, 2010, at 11:11 AM, Yuri wrote:
My e-mail to the maintainer of www/wordpress bounced.
Please make sure there is the valid maintainer e-email specified for
wordpress.
Yuri
Thank you for volunteering to continuesly scan the maintainer addresses whether
or not they
are still
On 07/20/2010 10:45, Remko Lodder wrote:
Somehow I get the feeling that you do not understand Volunteer projects and
that you are not
thankfull for the hours people spend on software for YOU.
Remko,
What makes you think that I do not understand Volunteer projects and
not thankfull for
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 10:52:34AM -0700, Yuri wrote:
On 07/20/2010 10:45, Remko Lodder wrote:
Somehow I get the feeling that you do not understand Volunteer projects and
that you are not
thankfull for the hours people spend on software for YOU.
Remko,
What makes you think that
On 2010-Jul-19 02:19:33 +, Janne Snabb sn...@epipe.com wrote:
On Mon, 19 Jul 2010, Joe wrote:
This needs to be in the handbook. How is anybody going to know that the
`find port_dir` is suppose to be enclosed by [`backticks`]. I has to be said
in words not just a printed example.
I would
On Jul 20, 2010, at 7:52 PM, Yuri wrote:
On 07/20/2010 10:45, Remko Lodder wrote:
Somehow I get the feeling that you do not understand Volunteer projects and
that you are not
thankfull for the hours people spend on software for YOU.
Remko,
What makes you think that I do not
On 7/19/2010 7:22 AM, Wesley Shields wrote:
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 11:33:48AM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
Dear port maintainer,
Since version 5.0.2 was committed over the weekend, if you select
WITH_POSTGRESQL in the config dialogue for sysutils/bacula-server, it
fails to link:
Linking
ash...@freebsd.org (Ashish SHUKLA) writes:
[1] http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/146513
Why do you need to copy license file in post-extract?
I added because specifying '${WRKSRC}/LICENSE' as 'LICENSE_FILE' results in
a conflict because License infrastructure in ports system
Chris - thank you for the attachment - using it succeeded and perl 5.12 has
also been successfully built.
Gary - no edits, no. However, using Chris's attachment as 'my.patch' and the
previous copy and paste from the inline code of ports/148648 as
'my.patch.old' for the diff run, below, you'll see
On 07/20/2010 12:11, Remko Lodder wrote:
Not about the mentioned parts.
But you are about:
Please make sure there is the valid maintainer e-email specified for
wordpress.
Without context and the like (should I mention that the original report to the
maintainer's email address is lacking
You are really reading much more into my message than was actually put there.
Sorry if that's my the style that triggered this. But I would like to assure
you that I wasn't even close to put anything against the ports or FreeBSD
community.
I communicate to maintainers a lot. And
On Wed, 21 Jul 2010, Peter Jeremy wrote:
The major problems with backticks is that they tend to be inconspicuous
(and easily confused with bits of dust or fly-droppings) and are often
difficult to distinguish from quotes.
Rather than write `find port_dir` (note the backticks), IMO, it is
far
On 07/20/2010 12:45, Douglas Berry wrote:
I use portmaster on a build machine to make packages, copying /var/db/ports,
and /usr/local/etc/ports.conf to all clients, and NFS mounting /usr/ports on
the clients.
Whats in your ports.conf ?
Also as in I don't use it I believe ports.conf relies on
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010, Yuri wrote:
You are really reading much more into my message than was actually put there.
That's not hard to do. :) I chose to read that part of your message as
if you had said, Dear FreeBSD ports committers. In trying to contact
the maintainer to report the problem
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010, Douglas Berry wrote:
I use portmaster on a build machine to make packages, copying /var/db/ports,
and /usr/local/etc/ports.conf to all clients,
As jhell asked, are you copying the relevant bits of make.conf too?
Also, are you copying your /usr/local/etc/portmaster.rc
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 17:03:49 EDT, jhell wrote:
Whats in your ports.conf ?
Lots of goop :-) but nothing perl related.
Also as in I don't use it I believe ports.conf relies on being
pulled in by make.conf am I correct ? If so then you would also have
to include your make.conf on every host
On 07/20/2010 14:07, Doug Barton wrote:
You are really reading much more into my message than was actually
put there.
That's not hard to do. :) I chose to read that part of your message
as if you had said, Dear FreeBSD ports committers. In trying to
contact the maintainer to report the
On 07/20/2010 13:12, Remko Lodder wrote:
Wordpress has the option to enable debugging, can you please try that? My
website (see my signature) is running on 8-STABLE, without issues, version from
thursday or something so fairly
recent.
Thanks,
Remko
(p.s. does httpd mention any BUS errors or
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 14:14:03 PDT, Doug Barton wrote:
As jhell asked, are you copying the relevant bits of make.conf too?
Yes, the build machine has PERL_VERSION=5.12.1 in make.conf,
the clients have PERL_VERSION=5.10.1 there. Otherwise they
are the same.
Also, are you copying your
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010, Douglas Berry wrote:
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 14:14:03 PDT, Doug Barton wrote:
As jhell asked, are you copying the relevant bits of make.conf too?
Yes, the build machine has PERL_VERSION=5.12.1 in make.conf,
the clients have PERL_VERSION=5.10.1 there. Otherwise they
are the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ed Schouten wrote:
Hello port maintainers,
I think I'd better send an email about this to ports@, because I've seen
it in various places and it is getting a bit tiresome to mail all port
authors individually.
I've seen various cases in the
- Original Message -
From: Yuri y...@rawbw.com
No, no BUS or SEGFAULT.
My quick debugging didn't produce much results. This must be some
robustness issue. It looks most likely like an issue in WP itself. So I
filed the PR: http://core.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/14367
Sounds like an
On 07/20/2010 15:15, Steven Hartland wrote:
Sounds like an upgrade issue, possibly a broken theme or missing
dependency.
We're running WP 3 on FreeBSD here without problem, although we don't use
the port as I don't really see the need for WP tbh as its so easy to
install
anyway.
port
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010, Greg Larkin wrote:
Ed Schouten wrote:
Hello port maintainers,
I think I'd better send an email about this to ports@, because I've seen
it in various places and it is getting a bit tiresome to mail all port
authors individually.
Unfortunately not all port maintainers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Doug Barton wrote:
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010, Greg Larkin wrote:
[...]
Anyway, here are some examples for daemonizing processes that don't
already have support for doing it themselves:
Daemonizing an executable without internal daemon support:
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010, Greg Larkin wrote:
Hi Doug,
Thank you for the useful background information and ideas about how to
proceed forward. I'll put this task on my list (hah!) and see how much
progress I can make.
Glad to help! :)
--
Improve the effectiveness of your Internet
- Original Message -
From: Yuri y...@rawbw.com
To: Steven Hartland kill...@multiplay.co.uk
Cc: Remko Lodder re...@elvandar.org; po...@freebsd.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2010 11:33 PM
Subject: Re: Wordpress outputs an empty page after ports upgrade
On 07/20/2010 15:15, Steven Hartland
Howdy,
I got tired of waiting for thunderbird 3.1 so I decided to give the
linux version a try. Everything works fine, except for fonts. When
attempting to change the fonts I can see the names of the fonts listed
but changing it has no effect. I can change the size, but it's still the
standard
On 07/20/2010 16:21, Steven Hartland wrote:
I think you may have got the wrong end of the stick there. Ports can
be used
to uninstall the old and install the new version yes, but I don't
believe it
automates any of the upgrade process required for something like
wordpress
for you.
No, look
Fwiw, I would much prefer FreeBSD ship with some sort of process supervisor
a la daemontools.
Jos
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
On 07/20/10 16:46, Jos Backus wrote:
Fwiw, I would much prefer FreeBSD ship with some sort of process supervisor
a la daemontools.
That's an interesting idea, but until we have someone willing to
actually do that work we need to deal with what we have.
Doug
--
Improve the
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 11:33:48AM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
Dear port maintainer,
Since version 5.0.2 was committed over the weekend, if you select
WITH_POSTGRESQL in the config dialogue for sysutils/bacula-server, it
fails to link:
Linking bacula-dir ...
Doug Barton wrote:
On Wed, 21 Jul 2010, Peter Jeremy wrote:
The major problems with backticks is that they tend to be inconspicuous
(and easily confused with bits of dust or fly-droppings) and are often
difficult to distinguish from quotes.
Rather than write `find port_dir` (note the
The following libs have Unrsesolvable links while lang/perl5.12 is
installed. This was not tested to be true while 5.10.1 was installed.
/usr/local/lib/libnetsnmpmibs.so.20
/usr/local/lib/libnetsnmphelpers.so.20
While this has not shown to be a problem in this installation it may
pose a problem
Anonymous writes:
ash...@freebsd.org (Ashish SHUKLA) writes:
[1] http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/146513
Why do you need to copy license file in post-extract?
I added because specifying '${WRKSRC}/LICENSE' as 'LICENSE_FILE' results in
a conflict because License
graphics/xpaint, which was previously failing is OK after this commit.
Thanks for fixing it!
A description of the testing process can be found here:
http://T32.TecNik93.com/FreeBSD/QA-Tindy/
Thanks for your work on making FreeBSD better,
--
QAT - your friendly neighborhood Daemon,
preparing
41 matches
Mail list logo
