Re: [ports/net/isc-dhcp*] Don't stop DHCP related daemons

2010-09-12 Thread Ion-Mihai Tetcu
On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 06:45:47 +0800 Denny Lin dennyli...@hs.ntnu.edu.tw wrote: On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 11:35:43PM +0200, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote: On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Ion-Mihai Tetcu ite...@freebsd.org wrote: This 'stop the service before we install' seems to be a new

Re: [ports/net/isc-dhcp*] Don't stop DHCP related daemons

2010-09-12 Thread David DEMELIER
2010/9/12 Ion-Mihai Tetcu ite...@freebsd.org: On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 06:45:47 +0800 Denny Lin dennyli...@hs.ntnu.edu.tw wrote: On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 11:35:43PM +0200, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote: On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Ion-Mihai Tetcu ite...@freebsd.org wrote: This 'stop the

Re: Problem with textproc/py-lucene port on 8.1-RELEASE

2010-09-12 Thread Ruslan Mahmatkhanov
12.09.2010 05:55, Gav... пишет: I take it the lack of reply means no-one else is having issues? Gav... Yes. I've tried to install this port to confirm it's brokenness, but it installs and runs fine for me on recent 8-stable i386. -Original Message- From:

Re: [ports/net/isc-dhcp*] Don't stop DHCP related daemons

2010-09-12 Thread Stefan Ehmann
On Saturday 11 September 2010 23:35:43 Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote: Hi, On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Ion-Mihai Tetcu ite...@freebsd.org wrote: This 'stop the service before we install' seems to be a new fashion, usually unneeded/disruptive. IMO this should only happen when it's really

Re: [ports/net/isc-dhcp*] Don't stop DHCP related daemons

2010-09-12 Thread Greg Byshenk
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 09:46:02AM +0300, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 06:45:47 +0800 Denny Lin dennyli...@hs.ntnu.edu.tw wrote: On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 11:35:43PM +0200, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote: On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Ion-Mihai Tetcu ite...@freebsd.org wrote:

Re: Option in port depending on another port, how to handle ?

2010-09-12 Thread Anonymous
Eric Masson e...@free.fr writes: Hello, I've locally added an option to www/nginx to add support for www/uwsgi. I'm hardcoding uwsgi version in nginx makefile : .if defined(WITH_HTTP_UWSGI_MODULE) NGINX_UWSGI_MODULE_VERSION= 0.9.5.3 NGINX_UWSGI_MODULE_VERSION!= ${MAKE} -V

Re: [ports/net/isc-dhcp*] Don't stop DHCP related daemons

2010-09-12 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 12/09/2010 07:46:02, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: And you can't really know if it's a new install or an upgrade. An app like portmaster or portupgrade would be able to know that. It's an oddity of the ports/pkg system that because 'upgrade' is implemented as 'delete' followed by 'install' that

Re: Option in port depending on another port, how to handle ?

2010-09-12 Thread Eric Masson
Anonymous swel...@gmail.com writes: Hello, NGINX_UWSGI_MODULE_VERSION!= ${MAKE} -V PORTVERSION -C ${PORTSDIR}/www/uwsgi Great. Seems I really need to improve my make-fu. Thanks for your answer. Regards Éric Masson -- FFTout le plaisir est pour moi. FFVous payez par

Re: Option in port depending on another port, how to handle ?

2010-09-12 Thread Eric Masson
Anonymous swel...@gmail.com writes: Hello again, NGINX_UWSGI_MODULE_VERSION!= ${MAKE} -V PORTVERSION -C ${PORTSDIR}/www/uwsgi Subsidiary question, as uwsgi nginx module needs uwsgi tarball, nginx distinfo must contain related checksums size. Is there any way to avoid duplicating

Re: Option in port depending on another port, how to handle ?

2010-09-12 Thread Dominic Fandrey
On 12/09/2010 15:23, Eric Masson wrote: Anonymous swel...@gmail.com writes: NGINX_UWSGI_MODULE_VERSION!= ${MAKE} -V PORTVERSION -C ${PORTSDIR}/www/uwsgi Great. Seems I really need to improve my make-fu. Thanks for your answer. This kind of thing can become a real performance burden

Re: Option in port depending on another port, how to handle ?

2010-09-12 Thread Anonymous
Eric Masson e...@free.fr writes: Anonymous swel...@gmail.com writes: Hello again, NGINX_UWSGI_MODULE_VERSION!= ${MAKE} -V PORTVERSION -C ${PORTSDIR}/www/uwsgi Subsidiary question, as uwsgi nginx module needs uwsgi tarball, nginx distinfo must contain related checksums size. Is

Re: [ports/net/isc-dhcp*] Don't stop DHCP related daemons

2010-09-12 Thread jhell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/12/2010 09:02, Matthew Seaman wrote: On 12/09/2010 07:46:02, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: And you can't really know if it's a new install or an upgrade. An app like portmaster or portupgrade would be able to know that. It's an oddity of the

Re: [ports/net/isc-dhcp*] Don't stop DHCP related daemons

2010-09-12 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 12/09/2010 15:46:18, jhell wrote: On 09/12/2010 09:02, Matthew Seaman wrote: On 12/09/2010 07:46:02, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: And you can't really know if it's a new install or an upgrade. An app like portmaster or portupgrade would be able to know that. It's an oddity of the ports/pkg

Re: [ports/net/isc-dhcp*] Don't stop DHCP related daemons

2010-09-12 Thread jhell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/12/2010 15:10, Matthew Seaman wrote: On 12/09/2010 15:46:18, jhell wrote: On 09/12/2010 09:02, Matthew Seaman wrote: On 12/09/2010 07:46:02, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: And you can't really know if it's a new install or an upgrade. An app like