On 17/09/2010 00:35, Anonymous wrote:
Dominic Fandrey kamik...@bsdforen.de writes:
On 16/09/2010 19:17, Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
* Dominic Fandrey (kamik...@bsdforen.de) wrote:
Just out of curiosity, why a version bump because of a build
dependency?
I don't think an autoconf update should
On 17/09/2010 06:41, Doug Barton wrote:
On 9/16/2010 6:15 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
On 9/16/2010 3:35 PM, Anonymous wrote:
Dominic Fandreykamik...@bsdforen.de writes:
On 16/09/2010 19:17, Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
* Dominic Fandrey (kamik...@bsdforen.de) wrote:
Just out of curiosity, why a
After yet more inactivity, I am reassigning asterisk16 to f...@kasimir.com
with portmgr hat. Thank you both for your patience.
mcl
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send
This is a snapshot of the 'top' command that shows Java at 100%.
Basically it means that the system is more in this state then functional
and I can't understand why!
Can anyone help me??
Otherwise I will have to start looking at migrating this service away
from BSD and much more
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 11:37:13AM +0300, Kaya Saman wrote:
This is a snapshot of the 'top' command that shows Java at 100%.
Basically it means that the system is more in this state then
functional and I can't understand why!
Can anyone help me??
You should probably spend a bit of
Thanks a lot Jeremy for the response!!
On 17/09/2010 11:56, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
[...]
You should probably spend a bit of time in a debugger (specifically a
Java debugger) figuring out if your code is spinning or not. Debugging
anything under Tomcat/Java is a PITA, and I say that from
on 17/09/2010 11:56 Jeremy Chadwick said the following:
I don't think you understand how Solaris's VM behaves with ZFS. It
behaves very differently than FreeBSD. On Solaris/OpenSolaris with ZFS,
you'll see the ARC taking up as much memory as possible -- but unlike
FreeBSD (AFAIK), when a
Thanks in advance for any help on this one
david
gmake[3]: Entering directory
`/usr/ports/devel/pwlib/work/ptlib_v1_12_0/src/ptlib/unix'
c++ -O1 -I/usr/ports/devel/pwlib/work/ptlib_v1_12_0/include -
I/usr/local/include -D_REENTRANT -pthread -fno-exceptions -O1 -
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 12:19:00PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 17/09/2010 11:56 Jeremy Chadwick said the following:
I don't think you understand how Solaris's VM behaves with ZFS. It
behaves very differently than FreeBSD. On Solaris/OpenSolaris with ZFS,
you'll see the ARC taking up as
on 17/09/2010 12:42 Jeremy Chadwick said the following:
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 12:19:00PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 17/09/2010 11:56 Jeremy Chadwick said the following:
I don't think you understand how Solaris's VM behaves with ZFS. It
behaves very differently than FreeBSD. On
- Original Message -
From: Jeremy Chadwick
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 12:19:00PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 17/09/2010 11:56 Jeremy Chadwick said the following:
I don't think you understand how Solaris's VM behaves with ZFS. It
behaves very differently than FreeBSD. On
on 17/09/2010 12:49 Steven Hartland said the following:
My experience is no this is no longer the case at least on stable + patches
mentioned on thread:-
zfs very poor performance compared to ufs due to lack of cache?
And at least one of those is a patch to prevent ZFS from giving memory too
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 12:53:09PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 17/09/2010 12:42 Jeremy Chadwick said the following:
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 12:19:00PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 17/09/2010 11:56 Jeremy Chadwick said the following:
I don't think you understand how Solaris's VM behaves
On 17/09/2010 13:07, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 12:53:09PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 17/09/2010 12:42 Jeremy Chadwick said the following:
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 12:19:00PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 17/09/2010 11:56 Jeremy Chadwick said the
When building the meta port xorg I get an error saying
libxml2-2.7.7.tar.gz local modification time does not match remote
Ports tree is updated with portsnap update.
Any advise ?
Thanks
/Leslie
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 03:52:01PM +0200, Leslie Jensen wrote:
When building the meta port xorg I get an error saying
libxml2-2.7.7.tar.gz local modification time does not match remote
Ports tree is updated with portsnap update.
Any advise ?
Can't reproduce...
# pkg_info | grep libxml2
On 2010-09-17 16:25, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 03:52:01PM +0200, Leslie Jensen wrote:
When building the meta port xorg I get an error saying
libxml2-2.7.7.tar.gz local modification time does not match remote
Ports tree is updated with portsnap update.
Any advise ?
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 04:36:20PM +0200, Leslie Jensen wrote:
On 2010-09-17 16:25, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 03:52:01PM +0200, Leslie Jensen wrote:
When building the meta port xorg I get an error saying
libxml2-2.7.7.tar.gz local modification time does not match remote
It looks to me like the tarball you have in /usr/ports/distfiles,
probably from a previous build attempt, it incomplete or corrupt. The
checksum validation failure is proof of this. I'm betting the file on
your system is too small.
ls -l /usr/ports/distfiles/gnome2/libxml2-2.7.7.tar.gz should
Hi,
I've just meet a problem with x11/nvidia-driver by installing it with:
make install -DNOPORTDOCS
The vdpau include files were not installed (vdpau.h and vdpau_x11.h):
ls /usr/local/include/vdpau/
vdpau*.h
I believe their is a problem in the Makefile on this line:
@${LN} -sf
Olivier Cochard-Labbé oliv...@cochard.me writes:
Hi,
I've just meet a problem with x11/nvidia-driver by installing it with:
make install -DNOPORTDOCS
The vdpau include files were not installed (vdpau.h and vdpau_x11.h):
ls /usr/local/include/vdpau/
vdpau*.h
I believe their is a problem
On 09/17/2010 00:41, Doug Barton wrote:
On 9/16/2010 6:15 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
On 9/16/2010 3:35 PM, Anonymous wrote:
Dominic Fandreykamik...@bsdforen.de writes:
On 16/09/2010 19:17, Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
* Dominic Fandrey (kamik...@bsdforen.de) wrote:
Just out of curiosity, why a
After a force upgrade of vim that had failed unfortunately not
registering the files it installed already I found out that it is
installing to / ~! ugh.
Why is ${PREFIX} being used and not ${LOCALBASE} ???
--
jhell,v
___
2010/9/17 jhell jh...@dataix.net:
After a force upgrade of vim that had failed unfortunately not
registering the files it installed already I found out that it is
installing to / ~! ugh.
Why is ${PREFIX} being used and not ${LOCALBASE} ???
--
jhell,v
While building kde4-4.5.1, I get this error:
# make install clean
=== kde4-4.5.1 depends on file: /usr/local/kde4/bin/kdebugdialog -
not found ===Verifying install
for /usr/local/kde4/bin/kdebugdialog in /usr/ports/x11/kdebase4-runtime
=== kdebase-runtime-4.5.1 depends on file:
There is an apparent size mismatch in the audio/espeak port:
/usr/ports/audio/espeak $ sudo make
=== Vulnerability check disabled, database not found
=== License check disabled, port has not defined LICENSE
= espeak-1.44.05-source.zip doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/.
= Attempting
Around 3 weeks ago, I had asked on the list about how to compile
FreeRADIUS 2 with support for e-directory. I had been hoping to get an
answer back by now from someone with a success story of using FreeRADIUS
2
on FreeBSD with Novell E-Directory for a backend. With the (very) old
freeradius1
On 9/17/2010 10:49 AM, jhell wrote:
After a force upgrade of vim that had failed unfortunately not
registering the files it installed already I found out that it is
installing to / ~! ugh.
Why is ${PREFIX} being used and not ${LOCALBASE} ???
LOCALBASE is where the ports can find things
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 09:21:46PM +0200, David DEMELIER wrote:
2010/9/17 jhell jh...@dataix.net:
After a force upgrade of vim that had failed unfortunately not
registering the files it installed already I found out that it is
installing to / ~! ugh.
Why is ${PREFIX} being used
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 01:49:37PM -0400, jhell wrote:
After a force upgrade of vim that had failed unfortunately not
registering the files it installed already I found out that it is
installing to / ~! ugh.
Why is ${PREFIX} being used and not ${LOCALBASE} ???
I reverted to the
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 5:29 PM, Anonymous swel...@gmail.com wrote:
Try to replace the line with
�...@${install_data} ${WRKSRC}/doc/vdpau*.h ${PREFIX}/include/vdpau
Thanks !
Works great :-)
Regards,
Olivier
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing
Jerry freebsd-ports.u...@seibercom.net writes:
There is an apparent size mismatch in the audio/espeak port:
and the date is more recent than the port change, as well.
Looks like the release was re-rolled upstream, without
changing the version number.
You can probably get away with grabbing the
On Fri, 17 Sep 2010 17:04:51 -0400
Lowell Gilbert freebsd-ports-lo...@be-well.ilk.org articulated:
Jerry freebsd-ports.u...@seibercom.net writes:
There is an apparent size mismatch in the audio/espeak port:
and the date is more recent than the port change, as well.
Looks like the release
Hi,
[2010/9/17 Lowell Gilbert freebsd-ports-lo...@be-well.ilk.org]
Jerry freebsd-ports.u...@seibercom.net writes:
There is an apparent size mismatch in the audio/espeak port:
[...]
Or you can wait for nivit@ to go through it and make an official fix.
Just fixed. Thank you for the report.
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 13:54, Wesley Shields w...@freebsd.org wrote:
While I agree that editors/vim could use the changes you're discussing,
do you really think such a comment is needed? Attacks like that are not
necessary. Let your code speak for itself.
-- WXS
This port has major issues
On 2010-09-17 22:00, John D McDonnell wrote:
Around 3 weeks ago, I had asked on the list about how to compile
FreeRADIUS 2 with support for e-directory. I had been hoping to get an
answer back by now from someone with a success story of using FreeRADIUS
2
on FreeBSD with Novell E-Directory
jhell jh...@dataix.net wrote:
... Mercurial being the distributed version control that it is
allows you to clone, make the changes you need to the clone test it
thoroughly and then either push or pull them to the main tree ...
At the risk of starting the VCS variant of the vi vs emacs wars :)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/17/2010 17:19, Wesley Shields wrote:
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 01:49:37PM -0400, jhell wrote:
After a force upgrade of vim that had failed unfortunately not
registering the files it installed already I found out that it is
installing to /
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 07:18:09PM -0400, jhell wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/17/2010 17:19, Wesley Shields wrote:
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 01:49:37PM -0400, jhell wrote:
After a force upgrade of vim that had failed unfortunately not
registering the files
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 03:51:42PM -0700, Rob Farmer wrote:
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 13:54, Wesley Shields w...@freebsd.org wrote:
While I agree that editors/vim could use the changes you're discussing,
do you really think such a comment is needed? Attacks like that are not
necessary. Let
On 09/17/2010 19:22, Wesley Shields wrote:
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 07:18:09PM -0400, jhell wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/17/2010 17:19, Wesley Shields wrote:
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 01:49:37PM -0400, jhell wrote:
After a force upgrade of vim that had failed
On 09/17/2010 19:52, Anonymous wrote:
jhell jh...@dataix.net writes:
After a force upgrade of vim that had failed unfortunately not
registering the files it installed already I found out that it is
installing to / ~! ugh.
Does the following diff fixes it?
%%
Index:
jhell jh...@dataix.net writes:
After a force upgrade of vim that had failed unfortunately not
registering the files it installed already I found out that it is
installing to / ~! ugh.
Does the following diff fixes it?
%%
Index: editors/vim/Makefile
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 16:24, Wesley Shields w...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 03:51:42PM -0700, Rob Farmer wrote:
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 13:54, Wesley Shields w...@freebsd.org wrote:
While I agree that editors/vim could use the changes you're discussing,
do you really think
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 03:52:17AM +0400, Anonymous wrote:
jhell jh...@dataix.net writes:
After a force upgrade of vim that had failed unfortunately not
registering the files it installed already I found out that it is
installing to / ~! ugh.
Does the following diff fixes it?
It
Anonymous swel...@gmail.com writes:
jhell jh...@dataix.net writes:
After a force upgrade of vim that had failed unfortunately not
registering the files it installed already I found out that it is
installing to / ~! ugh.
Does the following diff fixes it?
%%
Index:
46 matches
Mail list logo
