INDEX build failed with errors:
Generating INDEX-6 - please wait..pkg_info: not found
Done.
make_index: p5-Rose-HTML-Objects-0.611: no entry for /graphics/p5-Image-Size
make_index: p5-Rose-HTML-Objects-0.611: no entry for /graphics/p5-Image-Size
Committers on the hook:
acm kuriyama wen
Most rec
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 08:13:51PM +0200, Guido Falsi thus spake:
On 10/21/10 18:17, Royce Williams wrote:
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 2:51 AM, RW wrote:
On Thu, 21 Oct 2010 10:31:24 +0200 Guido Falsi wrote:
I have noticed on the machines I use/administer a bias towards
portsnap5.
If you def
/usr/ports/lang/erlang
/usr/ports/lang/erlang-lite
Hello Olgeni, Ashish, Port maintainers,
through a couple of tests I found out that Erlang 14B as currently in the
Ports Collection and therefor also built when building the most popular
Erlang program (ejabberd) can't run in a FreeBSD Jail as
Hi
Thanks in advance for any help here:
David
__
Failure as follows:
config.status: creating include/gfx/config.h
gmake[1]: Entering directory
`/usr/ports/x11/fireflies/work/fireflies-2.07/libgfx/src'
c++ -c -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=nocona -I/usr/local/inclu
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 01:38:30PM -0600, Greg Rivers wrote:
> > On Wed, 17 Nov 2010, David Southwell wrote:
> > >Does anyone know how to fix this one
> >
> > I'm seeing the same build failure, but only on FreeBSD 7.3. It
> > builds fine for me on FreeBSD 8.1.
>
> Folks,
>
> As mo
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 04:07:58PM -0500, Nikolai Lifanov wrote:
> I just submitted a fix to this port, but from what I found on Google,
> it's been changing sizes and checksums for a while now.
>
> Should I just disable checksum check in Makefile and submit it as a "fix"?
> What do you think?
W
I just submitted a fix to this port, but from what I found on Google,
it's been changing sizes and checksums for a while now.
Should I just disable checksum check in Makefile and submit it as a "fix"?
What do you think?
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org m
> Just pulled your latest changes, and now it takes more arrow keys to kill
> it, but two tabs still does the trick.
Revision 88ca1975d4dd fixed usage()
Revision 208207ddab2a fixed some bugs relating to outputting the option names
Revision 77b56ebf5150 added some more sanity checking for the optio
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 10:08, Eir Nym wrote:
> On 18 November 2010 21:00, Rob Farmer wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 09:25, Eir Nym wrote:
>>> Firstly, it is optional part.
>>
>> You didn't answer my question:
>>
>> .if exists(/bin/csh)
>> CSH?= /bin/csh
>> .else
>> CSH?= # What goes here
> Just pulled your latest changes, and now it takes more arrow keys to kill
> it, but two tabs still does the trick.
Ah, yes.
This is a feature request that I have not gotten around to yet (I've
been working on the one requests). At the moment "long description" is
a filename you provide when you
The following reply was made to PR misc/152296; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Eir Nym
To: arun...@freebsd.org
Cc: ken...@gmail.com, freebsd-b...@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org,
FreeBSD Mail Lists
Subject: Re: misc/152296: wrong message when trying to checkout using old
repo
On 18 November 2010 21:00, Rob Farmer wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 09:25, Eir Nym wrote:
>> Firstly, it is optional part.
>
> You didn't answer my question:
>
> .if exists(/bin/csh)
> CSH?= /bin/csh
> .else
> CSH?= # What goes here?
> .endif
>
nope, only CSH?= /bin/csh without any other c
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 09:25, Eir Nym wrote:
> Firstly, it is optional part.
You didn't answer my question:
.if exists(/bin/csh)
CSH?= /bin/csh
.else
CSH?= # What goes here?
.endif
And I'm aware it can be dropped using a knob. But I don't think port
maintainers should be expected to suppor
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 09:18:39AM -0800, Rob Farmer thus spake:
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 08:13, Eir Nym wrote:
On 18 November 2010 19:08, Jason Helfman wrote:
Wrote a quick patch:
--- bsd.commands.mk.orig 2010-11-18 08:05:47.0 -0800
+++ bsd.commands.mk 2010-11-18 08:06:17.0
On 18 November 2010 20:15, wrote:
> Synopsis: wrong message when trying to checkout using old repository path
>
> State-Changed-From-To: open->suspended
> State-Changed-By: arundel
> State-Changed-When: Thu Nov 18 16:58:58 UTC 2010
> State-Changed-Why:
> I'm very sorry for handling this PR inappr
On 18 November 2010 20:18, Rob Farmer wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 08:13, Eir Nym wrote:
>> On 18 November 2010 19:08, Jason Helfman wrote:
>>> Wrote a quick patch:
>>> --- bsd.commands.mk.orig 2010-11-18 08:05:47.0 -0800
>>> +++ bsd.commands.mk 2010-11-18 08:06:17.000
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 08:13, Eir Nym wrote:
> On 18 November 2010 19:08, Jason Helfman wrote:
>> Wrote a quick patch:
>> --- bsd.commands.mk.orig 2010-11-18 08:05:47.0 -0800
>> +++ bsd.commands.mk 2010-11-18 08:06:17.0 -0800
>> @@ -76,6 +76,7 @@
>> SED?= /us
Synopsis: wrong message when trying to checkout using old repository path
State-Changed-From-To: open->suspended
State-Changed-By: arundel
State-Changed-When: Thu Nov 18 16:58:58 UTC 2010
State-Changed-Why:
I'm very sorry for handling this PR inappropriatly. Somehow I was under the
impression tha
On 18 November 2010 19:08, Jason Helfman wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 05:21:47PM +0300, Eir Nym thus spake:
>>
>> 2010/11/18 O. Hartmann :
>>>
>>> Hello out there,
>>> I was trying porting some unusual scientific software to the ports
>>> collection (the first time I do) and run into problems.
Quoth Eitan Adler on Wednesday, 17 November 2010:
> > I downloaded it and tried it out. Whenever I try to navigate around the
> > options, I get a "File specified does not exist" error. I looked at the
> > source, and it appears to be looking for a license (or "licence" (sic))
> > file, but I did
Quoth Eitan Adler on Wednesday, 17 November 2010:
> > I downloaded it and tried it out. Whenever I try to navigate around the
> > options, I get a "File specified does not exist" error. I looked at the
> > source, and it appears to be looking for a license (or "licence" (sic))
> > file, but I did
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 05:21:47PM +0300, Eir Nym thus spake:
2010/11/18 O. Hartmann :
Hello out there,
I was trying porting some unusual scientific software to the ports
collection (the first time I do) and run into problems. The port does not
have any kind of Makefile environment, it is build
2010/11/18 O. Hartmann :
> Hello out there,
> I was trying porting some unusual scientific software to the ports
> collection (the first time I do) and run into problems. The port does not
> have any kind of Makefile environment, it is build and installed via a csh
> script. These scripts also seem
O. Hartmann wrote:
> As I realized while trying to port xerces-c version 3.1.1 in an test
> environment as suggested in the porters handbook, the software, which is
> capable of using the GNU autotoll environment, installs its xerces-c.pc
> file into ${PREFIX}/lib/pkgconfig/ and not according
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
O. Hartmann wrote:
> Hello.
> As I realized while trying to port xerces-c version 3.1.1 in an test
> environment as suggested in the porters handbook, the software, which is
> capable of using the GNU autotoll environment, installs its xerces-c.pc
> fi
Hello.
As I realized while trying to port xerces-c version 3.1.1 in an test
environment as suggested in the porters handbook, the software, which is
capable of using the GNU autotoll environment, installs its xerces-c.pc
file into ${PREFIX}/lib/pkgconfig/ and not according the
FreeBSD paradigm
Hello out there,
I was trying porting some unusual scientific software to the ports
collection (the first time I do) and run into problems. The port does
not have any kind of Makefile environment, it is build and installed via
a csh script. These scripts also seem to run via ${SH}, but it would
security/saint, which was previously failing is OK after this commit.
Thanks for fixing it!
A description of the testing process can be found here:
http://T32.TecNik93.com/FreeBSD/QA-Tindy/
Thanks for your work on making FreeBSD better,
--
QAT - your friendly neighborhood Daemon,
preparing a
The Restless Daemon identified a mtree error while trying to build:
saint-3.5.8_2 maintained by po...@freebsd.org
Makefile ident: $FreeBSD: ports/security/saint/Makefile,v 1.38 2010/11/18
12:48:19 arved Exp $
Excerpt from http://QAT.TecNik93.com/logs/8-STABLE-NPD/saint-3.5.8_2.log :
===> sai
from the feedback I received
Here is a new version (check-options is still branch yet)
This version adds 2 features :
- Conditionnal group and list :
if an option (OPTS) has the same name as the name of a group or a
list (OPTS_GROUP OPTS_LIST) then the OPTS_GROUP depends on the option
to be set.
30 matches
Mail list logo
