On Sun, 18 Sep 2011 21:38:46 -0400
Eitan Adler wrote:
> > Do you mean one gigantic, monolithic patch that would amend all of
> > them, or a large set of individual patches (last I checked, there
> > were ~1453 ports in need of this sort of revision)? I could go
> > either way, just need to know
> Do you mean one gigantic, monolithic patch that would amend all of them,
> or a large set of individual patches (last I checked, there were ~1453
> ports in need of this sort of revision)? I could go either way, just
> need to know which would be preferred.
One monolithic patch (preferably gene
On 09/17/11 18:09, b. f. wrote:
On 09/15/11 07:06, chukharev at mail.ru wrote:
Hi,
There have been a discussion about finding interdependencies of ports.
I have a relatively simple Python script for that. There is a pr
ports/160007
to add its early version. Unfortunately, I missed a reply to it
On Sun, 18 Sep 2011 20:04:32 -0400
Eitan Adler wrote:
> > So, what would be a good approach? Any suggestions?
>
> Prepare a patch and get a committer to ask portmgr@ for approval. I
> volunteer if you need someone.
Do you mean one gigantic, monolithic patch that would amend all of them,
or a l
> So, what would be a good approach? Any suggestions?
Prepare a patch and get a committer to ask portmgr@ for approval. I
volunteer if you need someone.
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listin
On 2011.09.18. 18:39, Eitan Adler wrote:
This patch requires approval from those CCed.
Approved for my ports. And thanks!
Gabor
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send an
* Eitan Adler (ead...@freebsd.org) wrote:
> This patch requires approval from those CCed.
Approved, thanks!
--
Dmitry Marakasov . 55B5 0596 FF1E 8D84 5F56 9510 D35A 80DD F9D2 F77D
amd...@amdmi3.ru ..: jabber: amd...@jabber.ruhttp://www.amdmi3.ru
__
I did a check yesterday to see how many ports in the tree still have
CPPFLAGS defined in either the CONFIGURE_ARGS or CONFIGURE_ENV variable.
There are still quite a few, I'm afraid.
Anyway, I was wondering how best to go about rectifying this
(admittedly minor) problem. I don't want to bombard t
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 12:39:48PM -0400, Eitan Adler wrote:
> This patch requires approval from those CCed.
I approve the patch.
Herve
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, se
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 7:20 PM, Matthew Seaman
wrote:
> The important bit was that it could be fixed without bumping port epoch
> by making the port version come out to 2.3.1a -- that missing dot makes
> all the difference.
i don't think that's an allowed PORTVERSION value
--
Alberto Villa, Fr
W dniu 2011-09-17 11:08, Matthias Andree pisze:
>>> - discuss whether we want/need to support this (a) in the framework that
>>> we currently use, (b) only in pkgng, (c) in portmaster and portupgrade
>>> where necessary.
>> Or we could have a facility to check whether services are running. For
>>
On 18/09/2011 15:14, Chris Rees wrote:
> Since Matthew pointed out that the versions were actually going forwards,
> you can indeed fix this with make fetchindex.
Err... no I didn't. I wasn't very clear in my explanation though --
sorry about that. I showed that the old version (2.3.1) was treat
On Sun, 18 Sep 2011 15:14:56 +0100
Chris Rees articulated:
> On 18 Sep 2011 15:02, "Carmel" wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, 18 Sep 2011 13:04:37 +0100
> > Matthew Seaman articulated:
> >
> > > If you wait for a few hours and re-csup it should be fixed.
> > > AFAIK, I don't think this affects portsnap beca
Note that the source code can be obtained from Debian, apparently.
Does it work, i don't know.
--
Michel TALON
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd
On 18 Sep 2011 15:02, "Carmel" wrote:
>
> On Sun, 18 Sep 2011 13:04:37 +0100
> Matthew Seaman articulated:
>
> > If you wait for a few hours and re-csup it should be fixed. AFAIK, I
> > don't think this affects portsnap because it generates the INDEX in a
> > different way. Or you can create you
On Sun, 18 Sep 2011 13:04:37 +0100
Matthew Seaman articulated:
> If you wait for a few hours and re-csup it should be fixed. AFAIK, I
> don't think this affects portsnap because it generates the INDEX in a
> different way. Or you can create your own INDEX if you want.
Thanks Mathew for you info
On Sun, 18 Sep 2011 15:32:41 +0300
Ivan Klymenko wrote:
> В Sun, 18 Sep 2011 05:04:40 -0700
> Robert пишет:
>
> > ev.3
>
>
> --- Makefile.orig 2011-09-18 15:32:03.0 +0300
> +++ Makefile 2011-09-18 15:32:12.0 +0300
> @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
> xcb-util>=0.3.6:${PORT
On Sun, 18 Sep 2011, Mark Linimon wrote:
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 06:45:21AM +, Janne Snabb wrote:
I noticed that someone has removed sysutils/ltrace for some reason.
If we pull up the page on CVSWeb:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/sysutils/ltrace/Attic/Makefile
We find:
2
В Sun, 18 Sep 2011 05:04:40 -0700
Robert пишет:
> ev.3
--- Makefile.orig 2011-09-18 15:32:03.0 +0300
+++ Makefile2011-09-18 15:32:12.0 +0300
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
xcb-util>=0.3.6:${PORTSDIR}/x11/xcb-util \
xproto>=7.0.11:${PORTSDIR}/x11/xpro
Greetings
Trying to test a couple of window managers and get the same error on
both. Something to do with devel/libev. Same error on 8.2 stable amd64
and 9.0 Beta2 i386.
===> Installing for libev-4.04,1
===> libev-4.04,1 depends on executable: pkg-config - found
===> Generating temporary pac
On 18/09/2011 12:59, Chris Rees wrote:
> On 18 Sep 2011 12:36, "Carmel" wrote:
>> opencv-core-2.3.1 > succeeds index (index has 2.3.1.a)
> On second thoughts, this looks like EVERSIONNUMBERGOINGBACKWARDS;
> alphabetical characters in versions usually indicate beta status and
Eitan Adler writes:
> > Another case I think of is mysql as a dependency when the user
> > might prefer MariaDB or PostgreSQL.
>
> This may not always be possible, but I do understand the point
> you are trying to make
Having never experimented with this, it is my understanding
th
On 18/09/2011 12:36, Carmel wrote:
> When running: "/usr/sbin/pkg_version -vIL=", I received this rather
> strange output:
>
> opencv-core-2.3.1 > succeeds index (index has 2.3.1.a)
>
> I would have expected output to be more like this:
>
> apache-2.2.20_1
On 18 Sep 2011 12:36, "Carmel" wrote:
>
> When running: "/usr/sbin/pkg_version -vIL=", I received this rather
> strange output:
>
> opencv-core-2.3.1 > succeeds index (index has 2.3.1.a)
>
> I would have expected output to be more like this:
>
> apache-2.2.20_1
On 18 Sep 2011 12:36, "Carmel" wrote:
>
> When running: "/usr/sbin/pkg_version -vIL=", I received this rather
> strange output:
>
> opencv-core-2.3.1 > succeeds index (index has 2.3.1.a)
>
> I would have expected output to be more like this:
>
> apache-2.2.20_1
When running: "/usr/sbin/pkg_version -vIL=", I received this rather
strange output:
opencv-core-2.3.1 > succeeds index (index has 2.3.1.a)
I would have expected output to be more like this:
apache-2.2.20_1 < needs updating (index has 2.2.21)
I have nev
On Sun, 18 Sep 2011 05:38:00 + (GMT)
Thomas Mueller wrote:
> First case I think of is the misc/freebsd-doc-* ports which want
> links1, which would be redundant if I already have lynx installed, or
> lynx and seamonkey too.
>
> I don't really like links1, prefer links with graphic capability
On Sun, 18 Sep 2011, Mark Linimon wrote:
> cd /usr; cvs co -D 20110731 ports/sysutils/ltrace
Oh, ok, that simple. Stupid me :).
I had an impression that there is some special trickery to access
the Attic files (I could not figure out how to reference the file
version just before the moment it
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 06:45:21AM +, Janne Snabb wrote:
> I noticed that someone has removed sysutils/ltrace for some reason.
If we pull up the page on CVSWeb:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/sysutils/ltrace/Attic/Makefile
We find:
2011-08-08 sysutils/ltrace: Has expired: Loo
29 matches
Mail list logo
