something wrong with LICENSEs

2011-09-20 Thread Sergey V. Dyatko
Hi, CCd eadler@ as he did last commit. When I'm trying update x11/xbitmaps x11/xtrans and other xorg-related(?) ports I got: === License not correctly defined: for unknown licenses, defining LICENSE_PERMS is mandatory (otherwise use a known LICENSE) with DISABLE_LICENSES all works fine,

Re: something wrong with LICENSEs

2011-09-20 Thread Ruslan Mahmatkhanov
Sergey V. Dyatko wrote on 20.09.2011 11:06: Hi, CCd eadler@ as he did last commit. When I'm trying update x11/xbitmaps x11/xtrans and other xorg-related(?) ports I got: === License not correctly defined: for unknown licenses, defining LICENSE_PERMS is mandatory (otherwise use a known

Re: something wrong with LICENSEs

2011-09-20 Thread Sergey V. Dyatko
On Tue, 20 Sep 2011 11:42:17 +0400 Ruslan Mahmatkhanov cvs-...@yandex.ru wrote: Sergey V. Dyatko wrote on 20.09.2011 11:06: Hi, CCd eadler@ as he did last commit. When I'm trying update x11/xbitmaps x11/xtrans and other xorg-related(?) ports I got: === License not correctly

Re: something wrong with LICENSEs

2011-09-20 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 11:13:38AM +0300, Sergey V. Dyatko wrote: On Tue, 20 Sep 2011 11:42:17 +0400 Ruslan Mahmatkhanov cvs-...@yandex.ru wrote: Sergey V. Dyatko wrote on 20.09.2011 11:06: Hi, CCd eadler@ as he did last commit. When I'm trying update x11/xbitmaps x11/xtrans

Re: Circular dependency in devel/doxygen?

2011-09-20 Thread mueller6...@bellsouth.net
Hey everyone, I maintain devel/doxygen (sorry I didn't add my 2 cents earlier, I've been a bit busy) and was looking at this particular thread. I know someone filed a PR regarding the circular dependency, stating that it might be best to split apart doxygen so one port builds just the program

problem with port x11/xbitmaps in Current and 7.4 stable.

2011-09-20 Thread Edwin L. Culp W.
Checked UPDATING and there isn't any mention. I get: x11/xbitmaps # make === Vulnerability check disabled, database not found === License not correctly defined: for unknown licenses, defining LICENSE_PERMS is mandatory (otherwise use a known LICENSE) *** Error code 1 Stop in

Re: problem with port x11/xbitmaps in Current and 7.4 stable.

2011-09-20 Thread Chris Rees
On 20 Sep 2011 13:10, Edwin L. Culp W. edwinlc...@gmail.com wrote: Checked UPDATING and there isn't any mention. I get: x11/xbitmaps # make === Vulnerability check disabled, database not found === License not correctly defined: for unknown licenses, defining LICENSE_PERMS is mandatory

Re: something wrong with LICENSEs

2011-09-20 Thread Sahil Tandon
On Sep 20, 2011, at 4:23 AM, Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org wrote: On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 11:13:38AM +0300, Sergey V. Dyatko wrote: On Tue, 20 Sep 2011 11:42:17 +0400 Ruslan Mahmatkhanov cvs-...@yandex.ru wrote: Sergey V. Dyatko wrote on 20.09.2011 11:06: Hi, CCd eadler@ as he did

Re: something wrong with LICENSEs

2011-09-20 Thread Ruslan Mahmatkhanov
Sahil Tandon wrote on 20.09.2011 16:41: On Sep 20, 2011, at 4:23 AM, Baptiste Daroussinb...@freebsd.org wrote: On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 11:13:38AM +0300, Sergey V. Dyatko wrote: On Tue, 20 Sep 2011 11:42:17 +0400 Ruslan Mahmatkhanovcvs-...@yandex.ru wrote: Sergey V. Dyatko wrote on

Re: problem with port x11/xbitmaps in Current and 7.4 stable.

2011-09-20 Thread Edwin L. Culp W.
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 7:13 AM, Chris Rees utis...@gmail.com wrote: On 20 Sep 2011 13:10, Edwin L. Culp W. edwinlc...@gmail.com wrote: Checked UPDATING and there isn't any mention.  I get: x11/xbitmaps # make ===  Vulnerability check disabled, database not found ===  License not correctly