"Klaus T. Aehlig" writes:
[...]
> #include
> #include
> int
> main ()
> {
> off_t u; long v; &u==&v;
> ;
> return 0;
> }
>
> and check for compile errors. However, the above program is rejected
> by clang, as the value &u==&v is unused, which, of course, has nothing
> to do with the intende
Hi--
On Sep 28, 2011, at 9:58 PM, Klaus T. Aehlig wrote:
> However, I assume that these kind of tests are quite widespread in configure
> scripts, so I wonder what to do about this. Possible options include
>
> - adding 'CFLAGS+= -Wno-unused' just for this port
>
> - do nothing, but recommend us
Hallo,
while trying to find out why I couldn't build net/socat with clang
I found something that might be a general issue, and I wonder what
appropriate actions would be.
Trying 'cd /usr/ports/net/socat && make CC=clang' failed for me and
it turned out that the reason was that the configure scri
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
If anyone is interested in testing, I've created a rough draft of a port
of mod_pagespeed. It can be found here:
http://people.freebsd.org/~swills/mod_pagespeed.shar
It uses a custom distfile that I made. If anyone is interested I can
share the
On 09/28/11 15:41, Hartmann, O. wrote:
On 09/28/11 22:18, Doug Barton wrote:
On 09/28/2011 12:39, Hartmann, O. wrote:
The mess started to happen when I tried to "repair" a non CLANG
compiling port math/gotoblas with portmaster -vf amth/gotoblas.
Since this build binutils and even gettext and li
On Sep 28, 2011, at 4:36 PM, Matt wrote:
> On 09/28/11 15:41, Hartmann, O. wrote:
>> On 09/28/11 22:18, Doug Barton wrote:
>>> On 09/28/2011 12:39, Hartmann, O. wrote:
The mess started to happen when I tried to "repair" a non CLANG
compiling port math/gotoblas with portmaster -vf amth/go
On 09/28/11 22:18, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 09/28/2011 12:39, Hartmann, O. wrote:
>> The mess started to happen when I tried to "repair" a non CLANG
>> compiling port math/gotoblas with portmaster -vf amth/gotoblas.
>> Since this build binutils and even gettext and libiconv, I guess they
>> got brok
Hello, port.
What surprises me most, is cryptic error with which it fails:
===
Extracting names from the following files for later perusal:
/usr/lib/libc.so
/usr/lib/libcrypt.so
/usr/lib/libm.so
/usr/lib/libutil.so
/usr/local/lib/libgd
Garrett Cooper writes:
>>
>> So if I change /usr/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh to something like vers 9.9 I'm
>> not
>> going to shoot myself in the foot if I try and update? I would really like to
>> avoid downgrading this box.I've altready been bitten once today and had to
>> build packages on my ti
Am 28.09.2011 22:40, schrieb Łukasz Wąsikowski:
> W dniu 2011-09-28 20:53, Matthias Andree pisze:
>
>>> We shouldn't go that way at all. Restarting service right after it's
>>> update is not a good thing. In many cases service will not start,
>>> because of needed configuration changes od other po
On Wednesday 28 September 2011 12:53:23 Beech Rintoul wrote:
> On Wednesday 28 September 2011 12:47:50 Doug Barton wrote:
> > On 09/28/2011 13:45, Beech Rintoul wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 28 September 2011 12:18:47 Doug Barton wrote:
> > >> On 09/28/2011 12:39, Hartmann, O. wrote:
> > >>> The mess s
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Beech Rintoul wrote:
> On Wednesday 28 September 2011 12:18:47 Doug Barton wrote:
>> On 09/28/2011 12:39, Hartmann, O. wrote:
>> > The mess started to happen when I tried to "repair" a non CLANG
>> > compiling port math/gotoblas with portmaster -vf amth/gotoblas.
>
On Wednesday 28 September 2011 12:47:50 Doug Barton wrote:
> On 09/28/2011 13:45, Beech Rintoul wrote:
> > On Wednesday 28 September 2011 12:18:47 Doug Barton wrote:
> >> On 09/28/2011 12:39, Hartmann, O. wrote:
> >>> The mess started to happen when I tried to "repair" a non CLANG
> >>> compiling p
On 09/28/2011 13:45, Beech Rintoul wrote:
> On Wednesday 28 September 2011 12:18:47 Doug Barton wrote:
>> On 09/28/2011 12:39, Hartmann, O. wrote:
>>> The mess started to happen when I tried to "repair" a non CLANG
>>> compiling port math/gotoblas with portmaster -vf amth/gotoblas.
>>> Since this b
On Wednesday 28 September 2011 12:18:47 Doug Barton wrote:
> On 09/28/2011 12:39, Hartmann, O. wrote:
> > The mess started to happen when I tried to "repair" a non CLANG
> > compiling port math/gotoblas with portmaster -vf amth/gotoblas.
> > Since this build binutils and even gettext and libiconv,
W dniu 2011-09-28 20:53, Matthias Andree pisze:
>> We shouldn't go that way at all. Restarting service right after it's
>> update is not a good thing. In many cases service will not start,
>> because of needed configuration changes od other ports not recompiled or
>> updated. The safe way is to no
On Sun 2011-09-25 22:01:13 UTC-0600, Warren Block (wbl...@wonkity.com) wrote:
> Recent discussion here about the desirability of replacing procmail
> finally convinced me to switch to maildrop. It turned out to be
> relatively painless. I took some notes that may be helpful for others
> consi
On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 19:33:31 +0100
Chris Rees wrote:
> On 28 September 2011 19:03, Christopher J. Ruwe wrote:
> > I submitted ports/160705 with attached patch on Tue, 13th Sep. The
> > maintainer has timed out. In fact, an attempt to contact the maintainer
> > beforehand was unsuccessful as we
On 09/28/2011 12:39, Hartmann, O. wrote:
> The mess started to happen when I tried to "repair" a non CLANG
> compiling port math/gotoblas with portmaster -vf amth/gotoblas.
> Since this build binutils and even gettext and libiconv, I guess they
> got broken. Last I saw was a successful installation
On 09/28/11 21:30, Matt wrote:
> On 09/28/11 12:16, Hartmann, O. wrote:
>> On 09/28/11 20:56, Hartmann, O. wrote:
>>> On 09/28/11 20:41, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Sep 28, 2011, at 11:38 AM, Hartmann, O. wrote:
> On 09/28/11 20:20, h h wrote:
>> "Hartmann, O." writes:
>>
>>
On 09/28/11 21:16, Hartmann, O. wrote:
> On 09/28/11 20:56, Hartmann, O. wrote:
>> On 09/28/11 20:41, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>>> On Sep 28, 2011, at 11:38 AM, Hartmann, O. wrote:
>>>
On 09/28/11 20:20, h h wrote:
> "Hartmann, O." writes:
>
>> On 09/28/11 09:26, Hartmann, O. wrote:
On 09/28/11 20:56, Hartmann, O. wrote:
> On 09/28/11 20:41, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>> On Sep 28, 2011, at 11:38 AM, Hartmann, O. wrote:
>>
>>> On 09/28/11 20:20, h h wrote:
"Hartmann, O." writes:
> On 09/28/11 09:26, Hartmann, O. wrote:
>
>> On 09/28/11 15:47, per...@pluto.rai
On 09/28/11 20:15, Hartmann, O. wrote:
> On 09/28/11 19:43, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>> On Sep 28, 2011, at 10:29 AM, Hartmann, O. wrote:
>>
>>> On 09/28/11 09:26, Hartmann, O. wrote:
On 09/28/11 15:47, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
> Eitan Adler wrote:
>
>> 2011/9/27 O. Hartmann :
>>
On 09/28/11 20:41, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Sep 28, 2011, at 11:38 AM, Hartmann, O. wrote:
>
>> On 09/28/11 20:20, h h wrote:
>>> "Hartmann, O." writes:
>>>
On 09/28/11 09:26, Hartmann, O. wrote:
> On 09/28/11 15:47, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
>> Eitan Adler wrote:
>>
>>
Am 18.09.2011 22:42, schrieb Łukasz Wąsikowski:
> We shouldn't go that way at all. Restarting service right after it's
> update is not a good thing. In many cases service will not start,
> because of needed configuration changes od other ports not recompiled or
> updated. The safe way is to not st
On Sep 28, 2011, at 11:38 AM, Hartmann, O. wrote:
> On 09/28/11 20:20, h h wrote:
>> "Hartmann, O." writes:
>>
>>> On 09/28/11 09:26, Hartmann, O. wrote:
>>>
On 09/28/11 15:47, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
> Eitan Adler wrote:
>
>> 2011/9/27 O. Hartmann :
>>> Now I unders
On 09/28/11 20:20, h h wrote:
> "Hartmann, O." writes:
>
>> On 09/28/11 09:26, Hartmann, O. wrote:
>>
>>> On 09/28/11 15:47, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
Eitan Adler wrote:
> 2011/9/27 O. Hartmann :
>> Now I understand why some OS vendors have choosen the latin
>> 10 'X' for
On 28 September 2011 19:03, Christopher J. Ruwe wrote:
> I submitted ports/160705 with attached patch on Tue, 13th Sep. The maintainer
> has timed out. In fact, an attempt to contact the maintainer beforehand was
> unsuccessful as well.
>
> Could you help me how to proceed to have my patch accep
"Hartmann, O." writes:
> On 09/28/11 09:26, Hartmann, O. wrote:
>
>> On 09/28/11 15:47, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
>>> Eitan Adler wrote:
>>>
2011/9/27 O. Hartmann :
> Now I understand why some OS vendors have choosen the latin
> 10 'X' for their tenth version of their operating s
On 09/28/11 19:43, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Sep 28, 2011, at 10:29 AM, Hartmann, O. wrote:
>
>> On 09/28/11 09:26, Hartmann, O. wrote:
>>> On 09/28/11 15:47, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
Eitan Adler wrote:
> 2011/9/27 O. Hartmann :
>> Now I understand why some OS vendors have c
I submitted ports/160705 with attached patch on Tue, 13th Sep. The maintainer
has timed out. In fact, an attempt to contact the maintainer beforehand was
unsuccessful as well.
Could you help me how to proceed to have my patch accepted?
Thank you, cheers,
--
Christopher J. Ruwe
TZ GMT + 2
pgp
On Sep 28, 2011, at 10:29 AM, Hartmann, O. wrote:
> On 09/28/11 09:26, Hartmann, O. wrote:
>> On 09/28/11 15:47, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
>>> Eitan Adler wrote:
>>>
2011/9/27 O. Hartmann :
> Now I understand why some OS vendors have choosen the latin
> 10 'X' for their tenth ver
On 25 September 2011 21:50, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 01:36:48PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
>> On 09/25/2011 08:18, Chris Rees wrote:
>> > On 25 September 2011 15:06, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
>> >> > ftp ftp.dti.ad.jp
>> >> > Trying 202.216.228.228:21 ...
>> >> > Connect
On 09/28/11 09:26, Hartmann, O. wrote:
> On 09/28/11 15:47, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
>> Eitan Adler wrote:
>>
>>> 2011/9/27 O. Hartmann :
Now I understand why some OS vendors have choosen the latin
10 'X' for their tenth version of their operating system ...
>>> FreeBSD XP anyone?
>>
On 28.09.2011 02:27 (UTC+1), Eitan Adler wrote:
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 6:55 AM, Rainer Hurling wrote:
This morning I tried to upgrade my ports after installing the new 10-CURRENT
(amd64).
There was a message about this on the list already.
Yes, I have read it. But mine was previous ;-)
Do
I run in a problem on FreeBSD 9.0-BETA3/10.0-CURRENT using OpenLDAP
(Cyrus SASL2 aktivated) and OpenLDAP backend (most recent client and
server). Thunderbird 6.0.2 and 7.0 coredumps with signal 11. I hadn't
any chance to check whether this also happens on 8.2-STABLE, but I'll
check this as soon
(process:20370): Gtk-WARNING **: Locale not supported by C library.
Using the fallback 'C' locale.
(npviewer.bin:20370): Gtk-WARNING **: cannot open display: :0.0
*** NSPlugin Wrapper *** ERROR: failed to initialize plugin-side RPC
client connection
NOTE: child process received `Goodb
Since upgrading cyrus/sasl2 2.1.25 and rebuilding net/openldap24 2.4.26
on 8.2-RELEASE/i386, any attempt to query using a SASL GSSAPI bind
causes ldap to come to an abrupt halt. The problem is remedied by
reverting to cyrus-sasl2 2.1.23_3 and rebuilding net/openldap24 2.4.26.
Scenario 1
---
from Chris Rees :
> Some rather strange printers will be recognised by umass before ugen
> recognises them; you have to plug it in before umass is loaded or it
> becomes a mass storage device.
> I'm not sure that the Windows printer stack is included in Wine, why
> would you rather do that than u
On 09/28/11 15:47, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
> Eitan Adler wrote:
>
>> 2011/9/27 O. Hartmann :
>>> Now I understand why some OS vendors have choosen the latin
>>> 10 'X' for their tenth version of their operating system ...
>> FreeBSD XP anyone?
> Are you sure there's a sufficient window of opp
40 matches
Mail list logo
