On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 11:23 PM, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> I have been working on getting Handbrake 0.9.5 to build on FreeBSD for
> some time. I had resolved a number of issues, but had no luck with
> some assembler issues in the ffmpeg portion.
>
Yes, I got stuck at the same spot. Then I found th
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 4:43 AM, Chris Rees wrote:
> On 29 November 2011 11:21, wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> the version of HandBrake in the ports is outdated and can not be build under
>> amd64.
>>
>> With the patches from http://www.bpsw.biz/handbrake-freebsd/ it is possible
>> to build the current ver
On 12/06/11 16:03, C. P. Ghost wrote:
Hi,
transcode is already it 1.1.7 and allegedly features a better
video stabilizing plugin. Our version in ports is still at 1.1.5.
Could you please update the port? The distfile is here:
https://bitbucket.org/france/transcode-tcforge/downloads
Thanks,
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 23:41, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 06/12/2011 23:24 Martin Matuska said the following:
>> On 6.12.2011 17:48, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>>> Just for your information.
>>> It seems that ld from binutils-2.22 by default has
>>> --no-copy-dt-needed-entries
>>> behavior, and so explicit
on 06/12/2011 23:24 Martin Matuska said the following:
> On 6.12.2011 17:48, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> Just for your information.
>> It seems that ld from binutils-2.22 by default has
>> --no-copy-dt-needed-entries
>> behavior, and so explicit --copy-dt-needed-entries is now needed where the
>> previ
Hi,
transcode is already it 1.1.7 and allegedly features a better
video stabilizing plugin. Our version in ports is still at 1.1.5.
Could you please update the port? The distfile is here:
https://bitbucket.org/france/transcode-tcforge/downloads
Thanks,
-cpghost.
--
Cordula's Web. http://www.
On 6.12.2011 17:48, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> Just for your information.
> It seems that ld from binutils-2.22 by default has --no-copy-dt-needed-entries
> behavior, and so explicit --copy-dt-needed-entries is now needed where the
> previous default behavior is relied upon.
>
> A short excerpt from the
Well, I'm wrong. I read "in effect" as "in fact"...
--
Zhihao Yuan
On Dec 6, 2011 9:33 AM, "RW" wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Dec 2011 08:04:59 -0600
> Zhihao Yuan wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 7:45 AM, RW wrote:
>
> > > But what I was getting at was the statement "linuxulator is a Linux
> > > kerne
Just for your information.
It seems that ld from binutils-2.22 by default has --no-copy-dt-needed-entries
behavior, and so explicit --copy-dt-needed-entries is now needed where the
previous default behavior is relied upon.
A short excerpt from the man page for your convenience:
> This option als
Hi,
2011/12/6 Juergen Lock
> On Tue, Dec 06, 2011 at 03:15:08PM +0100, Bernhard Froehlich wrote:
> > On 05.12.2011 19:56, Juergen Lock wrote:
> > > On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 12:37:19PM +0100, Juergen Lock wrote:
> > >> Hi!
> > >>
> > >> So I learned there are actually releases of xbmc pvr already
On Tue, Dec 06, 2011 at 05:12:59PM +0100, Mickaël Maillot wrote:
> Hi,
Hi! :)
>
> 2011/12/6 Juergen Lock
>
> > On Tue, Dec 06, 2011 at 03:15:08PM +0100, Bernhard Froehlich wrote:
> > > On 05.12.2011 19:56, Juergen Lock wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 12:37:19PM +0100, Juergen Lock wrote:
On Tue, Dec 06, 2011 at 03:15:08PM +0100, Bernhard Froehlich wrote:
> On 05.12.2011 19:56, Juergen Lock wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 12:37:19PM +0100, Juergen Lock wrote:
> >> Hi!
> >>
> >> So I learned there are actually releases of xbmc pvr already, which
> >> means nothing should stop us
On Tue, 6 Dec 2011 08:04:59 -0600
Zhihao Yuan wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 7:45 AM, RW wrote:
> > But what I was getting at was the statement "linuxulator is a Linux
> > kernel running as a FreeBSD kernel module" which I'm guessing now
> > you didn't mean literally.
>
> FreeBSD handbook:
> h
On 05.12.2011 19:56, Juergen Lock wrote:
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 12:37:19PM +0100, Juergen Lock wrote:
Hi!
So I learned there are actually releases of xbmc pvr already, which
means nothing should stop us from committing it to ports too? :)
Now I'm wondering if this needs to be repocopied fro
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 7:45 AM, RW wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Dec 2011 06:29:03 -0600
> Zhihao Yuan wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 6:21 AM, RW wrote:
>> > On Tue, 6 Dec 2011 04:54:18 -0600
>> > Zhihao Yuan wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >> Not really. The actual thing is, linuxulator is a Linux kernel
>> >> run
On Tue, 6 Dec 2011 06:29:03 -0600
Zhihao Yuan wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 6:21 AM, RW wrote:
> > On Tue, 6 Dec 2011 04:54:18 -0600
> > Zhihao Yuan wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Not really. The actual thing is, linuxulator is a Linux kernel
> >> running as a FreeBSD kernel module. The only thing FreeBSD
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 6:21 AM, RW wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Dec 2011 04:54:18 -0600
> Zhihao Yuan wrote:
>
>
>> Not really. The actual thing is, linuxulator is a Linux kernel running
>> as a FreeBSD kernel module. The only thing FreeBSD kernel do is to
>> identify the Linux program and to pass it to the
Hi,
this description looks a little bit short to me. A more detailed description is
available at
http://www.Leidinger.net/blog/2010/09/28/the-freebsd-linuxulator-explained-for-users/
Bye,
Alexander.
--
Send via an Android device, please forgive brevity and typographic and spelling
errors. Z
Hi,
you don't need to install an old linux kernel. It depends upon the features
used by the userland stuff. It is possible to compile glibc to use all
features, or to compile it in a way it works on an old kernel too (I have no
idea about the details involved). So all depends upon the linux-dis
On Tue, 6 Dec 2011 04:54:18 -0600
Zhihao Yuan wrote:
> Not really. The actual thing is, linuxulator is a Linux kernel running
> as a FreeBSD kernel module. The only thing FreeBSD kernel do is to
> identify the Linux program and to pass it to the Linux kernel. To the
> Linux programs inside a GNU
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 3:53 AM, Thomas Mueller
wrote:
>> The X server has a unix socket somewhere in /tmp. Normally this is used
>> instead of a TCP connection to the localhost. You need to change the DISPLAY
>> env-variable to use a TCP connection, or you need o make the unix socket
>> availabl
> The X server has a unix socket somewhere in /tmp. Normally this is used
> instead of a TCP connection to the localhost. You need to change the DISPLAY
> env-variable to use a TCP connection, or you need o make the unix socket
> available to the chrooted linux-env.
> The linuxulator in FreeBSD
22 matches
Mail list logo
