On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 3:42 AM, Alex Dupre wrote:
> Roman Bogorodskiy wrote:
>>> USE_AUTOTOOLS= libtool
>>> USE_GNOME= ltverhack
>>>
>>> to avoid bumping.
>>
>> I'm using it and it doesn't help: libgnutls.so.47 becomes
>> libgnutls.so.48 (where 48 is 'current').
>
> Probably you have not s
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 3:25 PM, Jakub Lach wrote:
> If I recall correctly 'portaudit -Fa' didn't
> change anything for me, and some attempt
> at updating of portaudit bombed after
> portaudit have been already deleted, so
> without pubkey I couldn't install portaudit
> again.
>
> But I may be wro
If I recall correctly 'portaudit -Fa' didn't
change anything for me, and some attempt
at updating of portaudit bombed after
portaudit have been already deleted, so
without pubkey I couldn't install portaudit
again.
But I may be wrong, I haven't exactly
paid attention from the beginning..
bes
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Jakub Lach wrote:
> Thanks for such attention.
>
> I'm using portsnap with main portsnap server.
>
>> Even after deleting everything in ports-mgmt/portaudit
>> and doing a new csup with the second commit I was
>> still getting the above error.
>
> Exactly. Now, si
On 2012-03-12 16:51, Frank Wall wrote:
> Hi olli,
>
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 03:00:42PM +0100, olli hauer wrote:
>> I tried a to port OPenVAS 4 last year but give up because
>> of to many linuxisms in the codebase.
>> (special for detecting network settings, interfaces ...)
>
> do you still hav
Thanks for such attention.
I'm using portsnap with main portsnap server.
> Even after deleting everything in ports-mgmt/portaudit
> and doing a new csup with the second commit I was
> still getting the above error.
Exactly. Now, since I've finally found pubkey (I was
looking in wrong places,
On 12/03/2012 18:06, Jakub Lach wrote:
> That would be too obvious, I've had fresh
> snapshots downloaded for several times
> since first and second commit, last one
> is from Mon Mar 12 18:46:26 CET I believe.
Well, I managed to get all the latest portaudit bits last night
including the pubkey b
>What's up with portaudit?
>
>It's still (since first yesterday portaudit update) complaining
>about missing key.
>
>portaudit: Public key /usr/local/etc/portaudit.pubkey not found.
>=> Please update your ports tree and try again.
>*** Error code 1
I ran into this same problem on the first machin
That would be too obvious, I've had fresh
snapshots downloaded for several times
since first and second commit, last one
is from Mon Mar 12 18:46:26 CET I believe.
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/portaudit-pubkey-tp5557072p5558587.html
Sent from the freebsd-
On 03/12/2012 05:48 PM, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
Running pkg2ng on r231193M ia64 gave these warnings:
Registering CalculiX-2.4... pkg: duplicate file listing:
/usr/local/share/doc/CalculiX/ccx/node580.tml, ignoring
Registering binutils-2.22_1... pkg: lstat(/usr/local/bin/ld.gold): No such file
Running pkg2ng on r231193M ia64 gave these warnings:
Registering CalculiX-2.4... pkg: duplicate file listing:
/usr/local/share/doc/CalculiX/ccx/node580.tml, ignoring
Registering binutils-2.22_1... pkg: lstat(/usr/local/bin/ld.gold): No such file
or directory
Registering docbook-4.4_2... pkg: dup
I'm seeing the following with any port that uses imake:
imake -DUseInstalled -I/usr/local/lib/X11/config
In file included from Imakefile.c:16:
In file included from /usr/local/lib/X11/config/Imake.tmpl:109:
/usr/local/lib/X11/config/FreeBSD.cf:451:35: error: '#' is not followed
by a macro paramete
Hi olli,
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 03:00:42PM +0100, olli hauer wrote:
> I tried a to port OPenVAS 4 last year but give up because
> of to many linuxisms in the codebase.
> (special for detecting network settings, interfaces ...)
do you still have your partial work somewhere around?
Every piece of
Le 12 mars 2012 à 15:00, Miroslav Lachman a écrit :
> Jerry wrote:
>> On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 13:19:40 +0100
>> Miroslav Lachman articulated:
>>
>>> I really understand that you don't have a time or will to maintain
>>> more than 1 version of PHP - it is not an easy task. But what is the
>>> differe
Jerry wrote:
On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 13:19:40 +0100
Miroslav Lachman articulated:
I really understand that you don't have a time or will to maintain
more than 1 version of PHP - it is not an easy task. But what is the
difference between more versions of PHP in the ports tree and more
versions of Py
On 2012-03-12 14:30, Frank Wall wrote:
> Hi,
>
> is anyone working on porting OpenVAS 5 to FreeBSD or has
> anyone tried to do it in the past? Any known problems,
> caveats or linuxisms?
>
> I've seen some posts about a year ago regarding OpenVAS 4,
> but it seems nothing has happended since the
Hi,
is anyone working on porting OpenVAS 5 to FreeBSD or has
anyone tried to do it in the past? Any known problems,
caveats or linuxisms?
I've seen some posts about a year ago regarding OpenVAS 4,
but it seems nothing has happended since then. I would
like to continue work on OpenVAS if someone
Le 12 mars 2012 à 09:45, Alex Dupre a écrit :
> Mr Dandy wrote:
>> May be more correctly set PHP 5.4 by default to lang/php5, and repocopy
>> current lang/php5 into lang/php53?
>>
>> Probably current maintainer of php (@ale) has the plan ;)
>
> I've already created patches to update the curre
On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 13:19:40 +0100
Miroslav Lachman articulated:
> I really understand that you don't have a time or will to maintain
> more than 1 version of PHP - it is not an easy task. But what is the
> difference between more versions of PHP in the ports tree and more
> versions of Python,
Alex Dupre wrote:
Mr Dandy wrote:
May be more correctly set PHP 5.4 by default to lang/php5, and repocopy
current lang/php5 into lang/php53?
Probably current maintainer of php (@ale) has the plan ;)
I've already created patches to update the current php5 port to 5.4. I'm
waiting for fixes to
(Note: an HTML version of this report is available at
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr-summary.cgi?category=ports .)
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users.
These represent problem reports covering all versions including
experimental development code and obsol
On 12/03/2012 09:28, Jakub Lach wrote:
> What's up with portaudit?
>
> It's still (since first yesterday portaudit update) complaining
> about missing key.
>
> portaudit: Public key /usr/local/etc/portaudit.pubkey not found.
> => Please update your ports tree and try again.
> *** Error code 1
T
What's up with portaudit?
It's still (since first yesterday portaudit update) complaining
about missing key.
portaudit: Public key /usr/local/etc/portaudit.pubkey not found.
=> Please update your ports tree and try again.
*** Error code 1
regards,
- Jakub Lach
--
View this message in context:
Mr Dandy wrote:
> May be more correctly set PHP 5.4 by default to lang/php5, and repocopy
> current lang/php5 into lang/php53?
>
> Probably current maintainer of php (@ale) has the plan ;)
I've already created patches to update the current php5 port to 5.4. I'm
waiting for fixes to other main p
Folks,
I've fixed build for games/frogatto with Boost 1.48.
http://alexanderchuranov.com/boost-port/games-frogatto-boost-148-2012-03-12_11-14.diff
Alexander Churanov,
maintainer of devel/boost-*
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.fr
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 11:37:42PM -0700, Stanislav Sedov wrote:
> The application itself was never supported by ports people and mostly is a
> work of two outstanding individuals, Akinori MUSHA and Sergey Matveychuk.
> I'm trying to keep it in a working shape as much as I could.
And all of this h
26 matches
Mail list logo
