Re: maintainer timeout for FreeBSD commiters

2012-07-18 Thread Chris Rees
On 17 Jul 2012 23:17, John Marino freebs...@marino.st wrote: On 7/17/2012 23:39, Mark Linimon wrote: On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 07:54:59AM -0400, Michael Scheidell wrote: We *are* making progress in cutting through the backlog though. ports have about 900 open PR. Why it does not have more

Re: maintainer timeout for FreeBSD commiters

2012-07-18 Thread Lars Engels
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 05:43:02PM -0500, Mark Linimon wrote: On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 12:09:50AM +0200, John Marino wrote: Would it be so bad if all my submitted patches (as a recognized quality contributor with history) just got committed as a passthrough? This has been explored on the

Re: maintainer timeout for FreeBSD commiters

2012-07-18 Thread John Marino
On 7/18/2012 00:43, Mark Linimon wrote: On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 12:09:50AM +0200, John Marino wrote: Would it be so bad if all my submitted patches (as a recognized quality contributor with history) just got committed as a passthrough? This has been explored on the mailing lists before,

Re: [HEADS-UP] CVS commit mails from ports

2012-07-18 Thread Beat Gaetzi
Hi Peter, 2012/7/18 Peter Jeremy pe...@rulingia.com: Thank you for your efforts in migrating the ports repository. On 2012-Jul-16 15:22:13 +0200, Beat Gaetzi b...@freebsd.org wrote: The ports tree switched to Subversion this weekend. CVS commit mails will be turned off soon. If you like to

Re: maintainer timeout for FreeBSD commiters

2012-07-18 Thread Chris Rees
On 18 Jul 2012 07:44, John Marino freebs...@marino.st wrote: On 7/18/2012 00:43, Mark Linimon wrote: On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 12:09:50AM +0200, John Marino wrote: Would it be so bad if all my submitted patches (as a recognized quality contributor with history) just got committed as a

Re: maintainer timeout for FreeBSD commiters

2012-07-18 Thread John Marino
On 7/18/2012 12:19, Chris Rees wrote: On 18 Jul 2012 07:44, John Marinofreebs...@marino.st wrote: Yes, somebody would have to set that up but it would pay big dividend I think. It also does away with the QA aspect that committers currently provide. I'd like to repeat that people sufficiently

Re: maintainer timeout for FreeBSD commiters

2012-07-18 Thread Chris Rees
On 18 Jul 2012 11:33, John Marino freebs...@marino.st wrote: On 7/18/2012 12:19, Chris Rees wrote: On 18 Jul 2012 07:44, John Marinofreebs...@marino.st wrote: Yes, somebody would have to set that up but it would pay big dividend I think. It also does away with the QA aspect that

Weird problem with bsdadminscrips

2012-07-18 Thread Ruslan Mahmatkhanov
I got this on one of my machines (9.0-RELEASE): = bsdadminscripts-6.1.1.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/. = Attempting to fetch http://heanet.dl.sourceforge.net/project/bsdadminscripts/bsdadminscripts/bsdadminscripts-6.1.1.tar.gz bsdadminscripts-6.1.1.tar.gz

Re: Weird problem with bsdadminscrips

2012-07-18 Thread Ruslan Mahmatkhanov
Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote on 18.07.2012 14:48: As you see variables are not expanded. Have no problems with other ports on the same system. Have no problem with this port on other machines. What to look for? Thanks. Ok, answering to myself. It was because of NOPORTDOCS=yes

Re: maintainer timeout for FreeBSD commiters

2012-07-18 Thread John Marino
On 7/18/2012 12:40, Chris Rees wrote: You are making a good point, but I'm trying to explain that the 'body of work' for proposing a new developer is no greater than the standard you suggest. We do have developers who only commit to their own ports; while it's generally hoped that they work on

Re: make failed for editors/libreoffice

2012-07-18 Thread Leslie Jensen
Hello. I've tried to update but it will not build and the suggested procedure to fix the problem does not work for me. Please see below. Thanks tail_build deliver Module 'tail_build' delivered successfully. 0 files copied, 0 files unchanged

Re: make failed for editors/libreoffice

2012-07-18 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Leslie Jensen les...@eskk.nu writes: I've tried to update but it will not build and the suggested procedure to fix the problem does not work for me. What version of clang do you have installed? ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list

SV: Re: make failed for editors/libreoffice

2012-07-18 Thread Leslie Jensen
I was forced to deinstall clang 3.1 because Libre office wanted to install devel-clang 3.2  Lowell Gilbert freebsd-ports-lo...@be-well.ilk.org skrev:Leslie Jensen les...@eskk.nu writes: I've tried to update but it will not build and the suggested procedure to fix the problem does not work

libreoffice fails to build

2012-07-18 Thread Robert Huff
On a system running: FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0: Wed Jul 18 08:15:22 EDT 2012 amd64 and system clang (3.1), libreoffice 3.5.5 gets stuck at: = (1/1) Building module sal = Entering

Re: SV: Re: make failed for editors/libreoffice

2012-07-18 Thread Jung-uk Kim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2012-07-18 10:57:58 -0400, Leslie Jensen wrote: I was forced to deinstall clang 3.1 because Libre office wanted to install devel-clang 3.2 I found that it does not build with clang-devel, yet. :-( It is not clang's fault actually and I am

Re: SV: Re: make failed for editors/libreoffice

2012-07-18 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Jung-uk Kim j...@freebsd.org writes: It is not clang's fault actually and I am working on a fix. Please stay tuned. One issue is that different problems have been presenting with very similar symptoms, so that it's hard to help people who need technical assistance. I don't see anything we can

Re: make failed for editors/libreoffice

2012-07-18 Thread Chris Rees
On 18 Jul 2012 12:55, Leslie Jensen les...@eskk.nu wrote: Hello. I've tried to update but it will not build and the suggested procedure to fix the problem does not work for me. Please see below. Thanks tail_build deliver Module 'tail_build' delivered successfully. 0 files copied,

Bug in dns/fpdns

2012-07-18 Thread Greg Rivers
The ports version of dns/fpdns seems to have this[1] bug: $ fpdns ns1.isc-sns.net. Net::DNS::Header::data: no such method at /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.16.0/Net/DNS/Fingerprint.pm line 668. [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830449 -- Greg Rivers

Re: libreoffice fails to build

2012-07-18 Thread Doug Barton
On 07/18/2012 08:46, Robert Huff wrote: On a system running: FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0: Wed Jul 18 08:15:22 EDT 2012 amd64 and system clang (3.1), libreoffice 3.5.5 Built cleanly for me last night on r238444. Are you sure your world is current enough to get the latest clang

Re: SV: Re: make failed for editors/libreoffice

2012-07-18 Thread Jung-uk Kim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2012-07-18 14:11:46 -0400, Lowell Gilbert wrote: Jung-uk Kim j...@freebsd.org writes: It is not clang's fault actually and I am working on a fix. Please stay tuned. One issue is that different problems have been presenting with very

[FYI] C++ compilers vs. __cplusplus (was Re: SV: Re: make failed for editors/libreoffice)

2012-07-18 Thread Jung-uk Kim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 While I was tackling LibreOffice build issues, I found something interesting about __cplusplus. Basically, different C++ compilers may have different __cplusplus definitions and it may cause some strangeness. Clang, for example, used to set it to 1

Re: SV: Re: make failed for editors/libreoffice

2012-07-18 Thread Jung-uk Kim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2012-07-18 18:21:53 -0400, Jung-uk Kim wrote: On 2012-07-18 14:11:46 -0400, Lowell Gilbert wrote: Jung-uk Kim j...@freebsd.org writes: It is not clang's fault actually and I am working on a fix. Please stay tuned. One issue is that

Re: libreoffice fails to build

2012-07-18 Thread Robert Huff
Doug Barton writes: On a system running: FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0: Wed Jul 18 08:15:22 EDT 2012 amd64 and system clang (3.1), libreoffice 3.5.5 Built cleanly for me last night on r238444. Are you sure your world is current enough to get the latest clang fixes?