Am 22.08.2012 04:49, schrieb Steve Wills:
Yes, sorry, see attached. URL updated...
http://meatwad.mouf.net/~steve/porttools_svn.diff
The patch at the online URL is correct now, the attached diff was still
reversed.
Steve, if any issues with the psvn script surface, do not hesitate to
Cc: me,
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 02:43:13PM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
What Doug mentioned (and I don't think was really considered, but
is valid) would break people that use pkg_* outside of ports. I know
of at least two instances where this would be the case (one case that
uses pkg_*
On 8/21/2012 6:58 PM, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On Tue, 21 Aug 2012, Doug Barton wrote:
I don't think we have ever done a complete replacement of major
infrastructure in one release.
You mean like sysinstall can be used as an installer on 9 that would
do something meaningful with the current
I view, rightly-or-wrongly, the mandatory usage of pkgng VS
/var/db/pkg/portname-number, as somewhat of a showstopper, at least
without more assurances... I interact daily with /var/db/pkg as
follows...
using the shells' tab-completion of /var/db/pkg/ to more efficiently
pkg_create, pkg_delete
On Aug 21, 2012, at 7:58 PM, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On Tue, 21 Aug 2012, Doug Barton wrote:
I don't think we have ever done a complete replacement of major
infrastructure in one release.
You mean like sysinstall can be used as an installer on 9 that would
do something meaningful with the
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 7:09 AM, Warner Losh i...@bsdimp.com wrote:
On Aug 21, 2012, at 7:58 PM, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On Tue, 21 Aug 2012, Doug Barton wrote:
I don't think we have ever done a complete replacement of major
infrastructure in one release.
You mean like sysinstall can be
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 10:52:43AM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 7:09 AM, Warner Losh i...@bsdimp.com wrote:
On Aug 21, 2012, at 7:58 PM, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On Tue, 21 Aug 2012, Doug Barton wrote:
I don't think we have ever done a complete replacement of major
Raphael Kubo da Costa rak...@freebsd.org writes:
Raphael Kubo da Costa rak...@freebsd.org writes:
Someone (TM) should check whether the first include is really necessary,
or if the code can't include raptor2/raptor.h, or if
-I/usr/local/include/raptor2 can't be passed before
Raphael Kubo da Costa rak...@freebsd.org writes:
Raphael Kubo da Costa rak...@freebsd.org writes:
Raphael Kubo da Costa rak...@freebsd.org writes:
Someone (TM) should check whether the first include is really necessary,
or if the code can't include raptor2/raptor.h, or if
