On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 5:21 AM, Jim Pazarena fpo...@paz.bz wrote:
Alberto Villa wrote, On 2012-08-28 3:31 AM:
USE_KDE4= kdehier kdelibs kdeprefix automoc4
KDE4_BUILDENV= yes
USE_QT_VER= 4
QT_COMPONENTS= corelib moc_build qmake_build rcc_build uic_build
USE_BZIP2= yes
I have created PR ports/171155 to report the issue, that
ports with long PLISTs cannot be deinstalled with PKGNG:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=171155
Regards, STefan
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
On 8/29/2012 9:39 AM, Stefan Esser wrote:
I have created PR ports/171155 to report the issue, that
ports with long PLISTs cannot be deinstalled with PKGNG:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=171155
Regards, STefan
Already fixed in the git repository (commit
Hello.
Could someone comment on status of ports/164072?
Have been percona ports ever committed to ports tree?
--
Best regards,
Alexander Pyhalov,
system administrator of Computer Center of Southern Federal University
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
On 08/28/12 21:41, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote:
I have installed conky for use with my wm which is Spectrwm. However,
looking in the conky Makefile one of the configure options has been
disabled, tcp monitoring (--disable-portmon), which is a feature i'd
quite like to have available. Is there a
Hi!
Could someone comment on status of ports/164072?
Have been percona ports ever committed to ports tree?
Other ones: percona-toolkit
I would love to see their database in the ports tree!
--
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 8 years to go !
[ Matt Burke wrote on Wed 29.Aug'12 at 9:01:59 +0100 ]
On 08/28/12 21:41, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote:
I have installed conky for use with my wm which is Spectrwm. However,
looking in the conky Makefile one of the configure options has been
disabled, tcp monitoring (--disable-portmon), which
Alberto Villa wrote, On 2012-08-28 11:51 PM:
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 5:21 AM, Jim Pazarena fpo...@paz.bz wrote:
Alberto Villa wrote, On 2012-08-28 3:31 AM:
USE_KDE4= kdehier kdelibs kdeprefix automoc4
KDE4_BUILDENV= yes
USE_QT_VER= 4
QT_COMPONENTS= corelib moc_build qmake_build
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 5:00 PM, Jim Pazarena fpo...@paz.bz wrote:
I use: csup -g -L 2 ports-supfile
and ports-supfile
has all the recommended defaults, including ports-all
what am I missing?
I don't know, maybe something went wrong in the past, but for sure
that file (at least) is out of
Alberto Villa wrote, On 2012-08-29 8:17 AM:
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 5:00 PM, Jim Pazarena fpo...@paz.bz wrote:
I use: csup -g -L 2 ports-supfile
and ports-supfile
has all the recommended defaults, including ports-all
what am I missing?
I don't know, maybe something went wrong in the past,
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 7:27 PM, Jim Pazarena fpo...@paz.bz wrote:
Which is the recommended way to stay PORT current? portsnap or csup?
I will switch to portsnap, but it is pretty slow compared to csup.
csup is just fine, but you probably did something that confused it. If
you want your speed
[ Kevin Oberman wrote on Tue 28.Aug'12 at 17:37:17 -0700 ]
And, as I mention rather often, pkg-libchk from
sysutils/bsdadminscripts can save you from rebuilding a LOT of ports.
pkg_libchk -o | grep LIBNAME | cut -d: -f1 | sort | uniq dep-ports
(where LIBNAM is the sharable (.so) installed
On Sun, 26 Aug 2012 22:54:35 +0200 Alexander Leidinger
alexan...@leidinger.net wrote:
Hi,
I detected a regression in the handling of the registration of the
PREFIX in packages. I'm not sure when it was introduced, surely more
than a month ago.
The problem:
- I have a symlink from
On 29 August 2012 15:17, Alexander Leidinger alexan...@leidinger.net wrote:
Could it be that my problem comes from r231300 and I was lucky that I
didn't create a package on the machine with the symlinked /usr/local
and used it on a machine with a normal /usr/local?
I have not been following
On 29 August 2012 13:27, Jim Pazarena fpo...@paz.bz wrote:
I am concerned, now, because I would have assumed that csup
actually DOES update me, where it would seem that it has a failing,
at least WRT japanese/kiten
Which is the recommended way to stay PORT current? portsnap or csup?
I will
I think my original reply did not go out on 8/27, so here it is:
do...@freebsd.org (Doug Barton) writes:
On 08/25/2012 16:58, G. Paul Ziemba wrote:
The second scenario exhibits the problem. Here, I delete the distfile
and just run portmaster without -F. The fetch completes, but portmaster
On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 15:28:36 -0400 Eitan Adler ead...@freebsd.org
wrote:
On 29 August 2012 15:17, Alexander Leidinger
alexan...@leidinger.net wrote:
Could it be that my problem comes from r231300 and I was lucky that
I didn't create a package on the machine with the
symlinked /usr/local
Am 29.08.2012 02:37, schrieb Kevin Oberman:
And, as I mention rather often, pkg-libchk from
sysutils/bsdadminscripts can save you from rebuilding a LOT of ports.
pkg_libchk -o | grep LIBNAME | cut -d: -f1 | sort | uniq dep-ports
(where LIBNAM is the sharable (.so) installed by the port in
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Alexander Leidinger
alexan...@leidinger.net wrote:
On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 15:28:36 -0400 Eitan Adler ead...@freebsd.org
wrote:
On 29 August 2012 15:17, Alexander Leidinger
alexan...@leidinger.net wrote:
Could it be that my problem comes from r231300 and I was
On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 21:48:31 +0200 Alexander Leidinger
alexan...@leidinger.net wrote:
On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 15:28:36 -0400 Eitan Adler ead...@freebsd.org
wrote:
On 29 August 2012 15:17, Alexander Leidinger
alexan...@leidinger.net wrote:
Could it be that my problem comes from r231300 and
On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 12:59:30 -0700 Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Alexander Leidinger
alexan...@leidinger.net wrote:
On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 15:28:36 -0400 Eitan Adler ead...@freebsd.org
wrote:
On 29 August 2012 15:17, Alexander Leidinger
On 08/29/2012 09:46 AM, G. Paul Ziemba wrote:
I think my original reply did not go out on 8/27, so here it is:
I didn't see it, so thanks for the resend.
One thing I did notice was that in the failed scenario (described
in my previous message), the tmp file named /tmp/fooDI-FILESbar
was
Me:
Life Happened(tm), which means I'll get to this first thing
tomorrow,
Back on the job.
Steps so far:
1) de-installed gcc46
2) removed suspect parts of make.conf
3) installed gcc48
4) de-installed gcc48
5) added back major suspect parts of make.conf,
but
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 8:17 AM, Alberto Villa avi...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 5:00 PM, Jim Pazarena fpo...@paz.bz wrote:
I use: csup -g -L 2 ports-supfile
and ports-supfile
has all the recommended defaults, including ports-all
what am I missing?
I don't know, maybe
http://www.reverbnation.com/hustlemann get a free download for just listening.
THANK YOU!!!
THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME...
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail
do...@freebsd.org (Doug Barton) writes:
I will need some time to address this, I'll try to get a patch out by
the end of this weekend.
Thanks for your efforts Doug. I'm not blocked by this issue but I'll
bet your fix will save time for others down the road.
~!paul
--
G. Paul Ziemba
FreeBSD
26 matches
Mail list logo
