On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 11:08 PM, Barbara barbara.xxx1...@libero.it wrote:
with the second patch it completed ok
thanks
Hans
It's ok for me too.
Thanks
Barbara
Thank you for testing! I'll submit this patch.
Best regards,
Riggs
___
Synopsis: little correction for comms/smstools3
Responsible-Changed-From-To: mm-ports
Responsible-Changed-By: mm
Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Sep 4 06:43:20 UTC 2012
Responsible-Changed-Why:
I no longer maintain this port, put PR back to pool.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=162607
Synopsis: smsd(comms/smstools3) doesn't read some configurations
Responsible-Changed-From-To: mm-ports
Responsible-Changed-By: mm
Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Sep 4 06:44:09 UTC 2012
Responsible-Changed-Why:
I no longer maintain this port, put PR back to pool.
Synopsis: devel/binutils create binary incompatible kernel modules
Responsible-Changed-From-To: mm-ports
Responsible-Changed-By: mm
Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Sep 4 06:47:00 UTC 2012
Responsible-Changed-Why:
I gave up binutils maintainership, reassign back to pool.
On 01-09-2012 21:40, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 01/09/2012 18:43, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
In this scenario the ports tree needs to keep support for older releases,
but that's a consequence of the fact that there's only one ports tree for
all releases. Somewhere in between the ports and the various
Hi all,
To help people that use mariadb *and* permit different mariadb versions
in the ports tree, I propose this patch to bsd.database.mk with
MYSQL_PROV, _MYSQL_PROV, WANT_MYSQL_PROV and DEFAULT_MYSQL_PROV that
defaults to mysql to keep current behaviour.
This way, one can define MYSQL_PROV in
Hi,
Recently a service kept crashing on a production box with a SIGSEGV 11.
So I rebuilt with debug symbols to analyse the core file, by adding
WITH_DEBUG=yes into my make.conf (gcc -g).
It got me thinking, is there any reason why it would be a bad idea to
build all my ports with debug
INDEX build failed with errors:
Generating INDEX-7 - please wait.. Done.
Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: ghostscript8-nox11-8.71_10
Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: ghostscript9-nox11-9.05_5
Committers on the hook:
ak dougb hrs linimon marcus mm wen zeising
Most recent CVS update was:
U MOVED
U
INDEX build failed with errors:
Generating INDEX-7 - please wait.. Done.
Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: ghostscript8-nox11-8.71_10
Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: ghostscript9-nox11-9.05_5
Committers on the hook:
ak dougb fjoe hrs linimon marcus mm rea vanilla wen zeising
Most recent CVS
[ please only choose one mailing list for now on, cross posting is discouraged ]
On 4 September 2012 05:26, Jake Smith j...@avenue22.net wrote:
Hi,
It got me thinking, is there any reason why it would be a bad idea to build
all my ports with debug symbols from now on?
Are there any
Quando a gente vota, escolhe os candidatos que irão nos representar na busca do
Bem Comum, que todos nós buscamos.Competência, seriedade, comportamento ético e
dignidade são qualidades que, embora raras, todos os políticos deviam ter. Mas
infelizmente nem todos têm.Por isso, vou votar num
INDEX build failed with errors:
Generating INDEX-7 - please wait.. Done.
Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: ghostscript8-nox11-8.71_10
Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: ghostscript9-nox11-9.05_5
Committers on the hook:
ak cy dougb fjoe hrs linimon marcus mm rea swills vanilla wen zeising
Most recent
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 8:43 AM, Florian Smeets f...@smeets.im wrote:
Hi,
we are looking for people using fusefs-ntfs. Bryan updated fusefs-ntfs
to the latest version and i have an update for fusefs-libs.
If you use fusefs-ntfs it would be great if you could download the
patches at
WITH_CCACHE_BUILD=yes seems to be working... howsoever a few (2) times
recently, portmaster would complete entirely (signaled by the 'yell' command as
yell, but returning to that tty0 (xterm or...) the compiler will be still
working on the already-upgraded port
[1]
(easily stopped by a
I'm sorry, I can't make any sense of your message at all.
Can you show something along the lines of, When I type X, Y happens?
FWIW, there has been no change in portmaster's support of ccache.
Doug
--
I am only one, but I am one. I cannot do everything, but I can do
something. And
When MAKE_JOBS was originally introduced the intent was to flip the
default after some amount of time and testing. Last this issue came up
there were objections based on the 7.4 release, 8.2 release, gmake
upgrade, and other wide scale changes.
I think it is time to revisit this discussion.
My
dialogwrapper has now been committed to Tools/scripts in /usr/ports.
Further testing is requested.
What is dialogwrapper?
dialogwrapper is a wrapper script for dialog(1) that works around some
bugs and takes advantage of new features to make ports options setting
easier and better.
On
On 9/4/2012 12:17 PM, Eitan Adler wrote:
When MAKE_JOBS was originally introduced the intent was to flip the
default after some amount of time and testing. Last this issue came up
there were objections based on the 7.4 release, 8.2 release, gmake
upgrade, and other wide scale changes.
I
Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 01:45:51AM -0400, AN wrote:
I use the base compiler for world and most ports, I do not want to
change at this time. So, my question is how can I tell
Firefox-nightly to use clang? Is there an equivalent to
USE_GCC=4.8+ for clang that I can put in the makefile? I want to
On 9/4/2012 11:36 AM, Jeffrey Bouquet wrote:
WITH_CCACHE_BUILD=yes seems to be working... howsoever a few (2) times
recently, portmaster would complete entirely (signaled by the 'yell' command
as yell, but returning to that tty0 (xterm or...) the compiler will be
still working on the
On 9/4/2012 12:41 PM, Warren Block wrote:
dialogwrapper has now been committed to Tools/scripts in /usr/ports.
Further testing is requested.
What is dialogwrapper?
dialogwrapper is a wrapper script for dialog(1) that works around some
bugs and takes advantage of new features to make
INDEX build failed with errors:
Generating INDEX-7 - please wait.. Done.
Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: ghostscript8-nox11-8.71_10
Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: ghostscript9-nox11-9.05_5
Committers on the hook:
ak amdmi3 ashish cy dougb fjoe gerald hrs jase linimon marcus mm rea swills
On Sun, 2012-09-02 at 10:15 +0200, Olli Hauer wrote:
On 2012-09-02 01:48, Waitman Gobble wrote:
OK, I can do that... BUT those three options were 'already' selected
when i did
the test...
snip ...
So it seems more and more the reported issue is a local one.
I
On 2012-09-04 22:29, Mike Jakubik wrote:
On Sun, 2012-09-02 at 10:15 +0200, Olli Hauer wrote:
On 2012-09-02 01:48, Waitman Gobble wrote:
OK, I can do that... BUT those three options were 'already' selected
when i did
the test...
snip ...
So it seems more and more the reported issue is
On 9/4/2012 3:29 PM, Mike Jakubik wrote:
=== apache22-worker-mpm-2.2.22_7 conflicts with installed package(s):
apache-worker-2.2.22_5
They install files into the same place.
You may want to stop build with Ctrl + C.
You can just change the origin:
portmaster -o
On Tue, 2012-09-04 at 22:49 +0200, olli hauer wrote:
If possible wait the next 40min. Im reworking at the moment the last APR only
option
about IPv4-mapping. IPv6 is an APR only option and v4-mapping should be off
by default.
(My tests build are running at the moment, I only have to
Le Thu, 30 Aug 2012 16:19:39 +0200,
Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org a écrit :
Hello,
After 2 years of development (first commit Tue Sep 7 2010), more
than 2000 commits, 43 different contibutors. The pkgng team is proud
to release pkg-1.0!
Hourrah! Many thanks.
Finally, how the
On 2012-09-04 17:53, Eitan Adler wrote:
On 4 September 2012 05:26, Jake Smith j...@avenue22.net wrote:
...
It got me thinking, is there any reason why it would be a bad idea to build
all my ports with debug symbols from now on?
Are there any performance hits
Yes. Code size grows and the
On 2012-09-04 22:49, olli hauer wrote:
On 2012-09-04 22:29, Mike Jakubik wrote:
On Sun, 2012-09-02 at 10:15 +0200, Olli Hauer wrote:
On 2012-09-02 01:48, Waitman Gobble wrote:
OK, I can do that... BUT those three options were 'already' selected
when i did
the test...
snip ...
So it
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 11:50:35PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 2012-09-04 17:53, Eitan Adler wrote:
On 4 September 2012 05:26, Jake Smith j...@avenue22.net wrote:
...
It got me thinking, is there any reason why it would be a bad idea to
build
all my ports with debug symbols from now on?
On 4 September 2012 17:50, Dimitry Andric d...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 2012-09-04 17:53, Eitan Adler wrote:
On 4 September 2012 05:26, Jake Smith j...@avenue22.net wrote:
...
It got me thinking, is there any reason why it would be a bad idea to
build
all my ports with debug symbols from now
The new options provided with 2.2.22_8 blow away existing IPv4/IPv6
knobs and the port tries to build with IPv6 on a system which is IPv4
only. The ending is not happy.
config.c: In function 'init_server_config':
config.c:1984: error: 'APR_INET6' undeclared (first use in this function)
On 2012-09-05 06:46, John Marshall wrote:
The new options provided with 2.2.22_8 blow away existing IPv4/IPv6
knobs and the port tries to build with IPv6 on a system which is IPv4
only. The ending is not happy.
config.c: In function 'init_server_config':
config.c:1984: error: 'APR_INET6'
On Wed, 05 Sep 2012, 07:27 +0200, Olli Hauer wrote:
On 2012-09-05 06:46, John Marshall wrote:
The new options provided with 2.2.22_8 blow away existing IPv4/IPv6
knobs and the port tries to build with IPv6 on a system which is IPv4
only. The ending is not happy.
config.c: In function
On 2012-09-05 07:41, John Marshall wrote:
On Wed, 05 Sep 2012, 07:27 +0200, Olli Hauer wrote:
On 2012-09-05 06:46, John Marshall wrote:
The new options provided with 2.2.22_8 blow away existing IPv4/IPv6
knobs and the port tries to build with IPv6 on a system which is IPv4
only. The ending
36 matches
Mail list logo
