Re: devel/subversion: Module mod_dav_svn gets not build, breaks Apache 24 DAV/SVN installations!

2013-06-19 Thread O. Hartmann
On Thu, 20 Jun 2013 01:46:35 +0400 Lev Serebryakov wrote: > Hello, Charles. > You wrote 20 июня 2013 г., 0:32:13: > > >> Can someone help? > > CS> For testing, I just built subversion-1.8.0 against Apache-2.2.24 > CS> directly via: > > CS> ./configure --enable-mod-activation > CS> --with-apr

Re: www/rubygem-passenger now requires bash?

2013-06-19 Thread Steve Wills
> I'm running FreeBSD/amd64 8-STABLE (r250276) and, yesterday, updated > www/rubygem-passenger from 3.0.19 to 4.0.5 via portmaster. Although the > port upgraded without error, the resultant Passenger no longer works: it > complains it can't find "bash" and Rails apps won't spawn. > > I don't have

Re: devel/subversion: Module mod_dav_svn gets not build, breaks Apache 24 DAV/SVN installations!

2013-06-19 Thread Charles Swiger
Hi, Lev-- On Jun 19, 2013, at 2:46 PM, Lev Serebryakov wrote: > Hello, Charles. > You wrote 20 июня 2013 г., 0:32:13: >>> Can someone help? > > CS> For testing, I just built subversion-1.8.0 against Apache-2.2.24 directly > via: > CS> > CS> ./configure --enable-mod-activation --with-apr=/usr/lo

Re: ports && 10-CURRENT

2013-06-19 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 12:26:40PM -0700, Cy Schubert wrote: > In message <20130619141527.ga25...@sh4-5.1blu.de>, Matthias Apitz writes: > > El día Wednesday, June 19, 2013 a las 06:32:40AM -0700, Cy Schubert > > escribió: > > > > > You don't understand. devel/imake is a fine piece of software bu

Re: devel/subversion: Module mod_dav_svn gets not build, breaks Apache 24 DAV/SVN installations!

2013-06-19 Thread Lev Serebryakov
Hello, Charles. You wrote 20 июня 2013 г., 0:32:13: >> Can someone help? CS> For testing, I just built subversion-1.8.0 against Apache-2.2.24 directly via: CS> ./configure --enable-mod-activation CS> --with-apr=/usr/local/apache2 CS> --with-apxs=/usr/local/apache2/bin/apxs CS> ...which produ

Re: devel/subversion: Module mod_dav_svn gets not build, breaks Apache 24 DAV/SVN installations!

2013-06-19 Thread Charles Swiger
Hi-- On Jun 19, 2013, at 11:30 AM, O. Hartmann wrote: [ ... ] > Although selected, devel/subversion (1.8.0) doesn't build the module > mod_dav_svn which is crucial for the subversion subsystem. > > Can someone help? For testing, I just built subversion-1.8.0 against Apache-2.2.24 directly via:

Re: devel/subversion: Module mod_dav_svn gets not build, breaks Apache 24 DAV/SVN installations!

2013-06-19 Thread O. Hartmann
On Wed, 19 Jun 2013 13:32:13 -0700 Charles Swiger wrote: > Hi-- > > On Jun 19, 2013, at 11:30 AM, O. Hartmann wrote: > [ ... ] > > Although selected, devel/subversion (1.8.0) doesn't build the module > > mod_dav_svn which is crucial for the subversion subsystem. > > > > Can someone help? > >

Re: ports && 10-CURRENT

2013-06-19 Thread Cy Schubert
In message <20130619141527.ga25...@sh4-5.1blu.de>, Matthias Apitz writes: > El día Wednesday, June 19, 2013 a las 06:32:40AM -0700, Cy Schubert escribió: > > > You don't understand. devel/imake is a fine piece of software but people do > > > not want to install more software than they have to. n

Re: ports && 10-CURRENT

2013-06-19 Thread John Marino
On 6/19/2013 20:52, Cy Schubert wrote: The point is, why install software permanently when you don't need to? Or, go through the exercise of uninstalling build software post-install? That's not pertinent for binary packages. The build depends aren't tied to the final products. It's just a b

Re: ports && 10-CURRENT

2013-06-19 Thread Cy Schubert
In message , "Andrew W. Nosenko" writes: > On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 4:32 PM, Cy Schubert wrote > : > > You don't understand. devel/imake is a fine piece of software but people do > > not want to install more software than they have to. net/vnc comes with > > it's own integrated Xserver. Using this

devel/subversion: Module mod_dav_svn gets not build, breaks Apache 24 DAV/SVN installations!

2013-06-19 Thread O. Hartmann
Several systems running FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT with Apache 24 serving development subversion repositories via WebDAV were broken by a faulty devel/subversion port, just updated to 1.8.0 today. Strange thing is that those fancy dialog boxes for the configuration ALWAYS popo up no matter whether I hav

Re: ports && 10-CURRENT

2013-06-19 Thread Andrew W. Nosenko
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 4:32 PM, Cy Schubert wrote: > You don't understand. devel/imake is a fine piece of software but people do > not want to install more software than they have to. net/vnc comes with > it's own integrated Xserver. Using this logic we should integrate > x11-servers/xorg into it

Re: portlint: FATAL: Makefile: [1]: old style headers found.

2013-06-19 Thread Matthias Andree
Am 19.06.2013 12:53, schrieb Guido Falsi: > On 06/19/13 12:50, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: >> devel/robodoc/Makefile: >> >> # New ports collection makefile for:robodoc >> # Date created: 15 Dec 1999 >> # Whom: Will Andrews >> >> # >> # $Fre

STABLE vs CURRENT packages

2013-06-19 Thread Patrick Powell
I just know that this is somewhere in the FreeBSD Handbook. And I probably deserve the scorn and snickers these questions will get. I just checked the .ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/amd64/ site and saw: packages-8-stable

Ori Distributed File System Port

2013-06-19 Thread Ali Mashtizadeh
Hey Folks, Could someone take a look at my port that's been pending? Its bit more complicated than previous ports I've submitted, but I followed the testing in Section 3.4 of the porters handbook. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=176429&cat Thanks, -- Ali Mashtizadeh _

Re: ports && 10-CURRENT

2013-06-19 Thread Matthias Apitz
El día Wednesday, June 19, 2013 a las 06:32:40AM -0700, Cy Schubert escribió: > You don't understand. devel/imake is a fine piece of software but people do > not want to install more software than they have to. net/vnc comes with > it's own integrated Xserver. Using this logic we should integrat

Re: ports && 10-CURRENT

2013-06-19 Thread Matthias Apitz
El día Wednesday, June 19, 2013 a las 06:18:58AM -0700, Cy Schubert escribió: > There are quite a few ports which have issues using the new toolchain in > 10. Dragging in imake in ports and the rest of X would be overkill too. > I'll put this on my todo list for 10. Hi Cy. The port devel/imake

Re: ports && 10-CURRENT

2013-06-19 Thread Cy Schubert
You don't understand. devel/imake is a fine piece of software but people do not want to install more software than they have to. net/vnc comes with it's own integrated Xserver. Using this logic we should integrate x11-servers/xorg into it too. Neither makes sense. The only reason to use devel/i

Re: ports && 10-CURRENT

2013-06-19 Thread Cy Schubert
There are quite a few ports which have issues using the new toolchain in 10. Dragging in imake in ports and the rest of X would be overkill too. I'll put this on my todo list for 10. -- Cheers, Cy Schubert FreeBSD UNIX: Web: http://www.FreeBSD.org In message <20130618045504.GA1790@La-H

ports/179716

2013-06-19 Thread Vasiliy P. Melnik
Hi. Please submit port update ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date

2013-06-19 Thread portscout
| 20130619 +-+ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org

Re: [HEADS UP] switch default xorg version in 9.1 and later

2013-06-19 Thread Mark Linimon
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 04:03:36AM -0700, Thomas Mueller wrote: > Now I am a bit confused, should it be x...@freebsd.org or > freebsd-...@freebsd.org, or is one an alias for the other? They are aliases. mcl ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list htt

Re: portlint: FATAL: Makefile: [1]: old style headers found.

2013-06-19 Thread Guido Falsi
On 06/19/13 13:12, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: From m...@madpilot.net Wed Jun 19 12:08:06 2013 On 06/19/13 12:50, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > devel/robodoc/Makefile: > > # New ports collection makefile for:robodoc > # Date created:

Re: I would like to maintain devel/robodoc

2013-06-19 Thread Boris Samorodov
done -- WBR, Boris Samorodov (bsam) FreeBSD Committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr.

Re: portlint: FATAL: Makefile: [1]: old style headers found.

2013-06-19 Thread Anton Shterenlikht
From m...@madpilot.net Wed Jun 19 12:08:06 2013 On 06/19/13 12:50, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > devel/robodoc/Makefile: > > # New ports collection makefile for:robodoc > # Date created: 15 Dec 1999 > # Whom:

Re: [HEADS UP] switch default xorg version in 9.1 and later

2013-06-19 Thread Thomas Mueller
> Hi! > It is time to switch the default version of xorg on FreeBSD 9.1 and > later, including CURRENT. > In general this means better support for modern hardware, especially > intel hardware, at the cost of support for some legacy hardware. > The old version will still be around, and be the defau

Re: portlint: FATAL: Makefile: [1]: old style headers found.

2013-06-19 Thread Guido Falsi
On 06/19/13 12:50, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: devel/robodoc/Makefile: # New ports collection makefile for:robodoc # Date created: 15 Dec 1999 # Whom: Will Andrews # # $FreeBSD: branches/RELENG_9_1_0/devel/robodoc/Makefile 300896 2012-07

portlint: FATAL: Makefile: [1]: old style headers found.

2013-06-19 Thread Anton Shterenlikht
devel/robodoc/Makefile: # New ports collection makefile for:robodoc # Date created: 15 Dec 1999 # Whom: Will Andrews # # $FreeBSD: branches/RELENG_9_1_0/devel/robodoc/Makefile 300896 2012-07-14 13:54:48Z beat $ # portlint version 2.14.

I would like to maintain devel/robodoc

2013-06-19 Thread Anton Shterenlikht
___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: devel/rubygem-notify: maintainership request

2013-06-19 Thread Koichiro IWAO
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 12:01:37PM +0200, Emanuel Haupt wrote: > Koichiro IWAO wrote: > > Can I take maintainership of devel/rubygem-notify? I will update the > > port. > > Please pass maitainership to meta+po...@vmeta.jp. > > Done. It's all yours. > > Emanuel Thanks! -- `whois vmeta.jp | nk

Re: devel/rubygem-notify: maintainership request

2013-06-19 Thread Emanuel Haupt
Koichiro IWAO wrote: > Can I take maintainership of devel/rubygem-notify? I will update the > port. > Please pass maitainership to meta+po...@vmeta.jp. Done. It's all yours. Emanuel ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/m

devel/rubygem-notify: maintainership request

2013-06-19 Thread Koichiro IWAO
Can I take maintainership of devel/rubygem-notify? I will update the port. Please pass maitainership to meta+po...@vmeta.jp. -- `whois vmeta.jp | nkf -w` meta ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd