FreeBSD Port: net-im/py-pyxmpp

py-pyxmpp 1.1.2_yes is not a valid port name. portsdb error Not in due form: '[_][,]'. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@fr

Re: shells/bash-static fails to package/deinstall cleanly

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 12/26/2013 02:55 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: Thank you. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJSvLvUAAoJEFzGhvEaGryES3MIAM7YTPgDnWy/BmNEM3Ctw/Ls MzxCtwibdCYVuMxnLGHNybMK+I+VQYJrSfIiSpnhq9ioml9HzhdyNx

Re: Too frequent/poorly tested bsd.port.mk commits, and general uselessness of p5-FreeBSD-Portindex

On 26/12/2013 08:34, Doug Barton wrote: > On 12/25/2013 11:30 PM, Doug Barton wrote: >> I have used Matthew's p5-FreeBSD-Portindex for several years. In the >> past it was a very valuable tool that allowed me to keep an INDEX up to >> date relative to changes in the ports tree in seconds or minutes

Cannot build synergy-devel

Hello. Since some time I cannot build sysutil/synergy-devel anymore. The box is 9.1/i386 and all dependencies are up to date. Although this is not a big or urgent problem to me, I though I'd let you know. Below is the full build log. If you want me to test anything, just tell. Thanks for you

Re: Updating CUPS

On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 11:03:48PM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote: > 26.12.2013 22:29, Jerry пишет: > > > All I asked was if an updated version of CUPS was planned to be > > introduced into the ports system. > > I run 1.7.0 at my system for two weeks. However there are some > problems I'm working o

Re: Updating CUPS

26.12.2013 22:29, Jerry пишет: > All I asked was if an updated version of CUPS was planned to be > introduced into the ports system. I run 1.7.0 at my system for two weeks. However there are some problems I'm working on. Sorry, no time estimation for now. -- WBR, Boris Samorodov (bsam) FreeBSD

[QAT] r337542: 4x leftovers

Make knotd startup script work again. >From the PR: When submitting PR 183682 I was unaware the patch as in PR 182792 wasn't committed yet. So to my amazing I just noticed the startup problem still exists. Enclosed patch is basicly the same as the uncommited one, but besides the removal

Re: Updating CUPS

On Thu, 26 Dec 2013 18:30:07 +0100, Matthias Andree stated: > I meant deliberate changes in concepts, not just happenstances... > Check what Fedora and other Linux distros have been doing to work > around those before you complain. > > And remember this is a volunteer project, you are not paying

Re: WITHOUT_NLS is deprecated use NLS option instead

On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 7:46 AM, Michael Gmelin wrote: > Adding a (shortened, so easy to type) URL pointing to the wiki or > whatever resource describing why this happened could be useful (not just > for this, but for all of these deprecation warnings, so users > understand the rationale behind t

Re: Updating CUPS

Jerry schrieb: >On Wed, 25 Dec 2013 09:14:55 +0100, Matthias Andree stated: > >> Jerry schrieb: >> >The ports latest version of CUPS is 1.5.4; however version 1.7.0 has >> >been out since 10/24/13. Is there any possibility that the latest >> >version will make it into the ports system soon? >>

Re: WITHOUT_NLS is deprecated use NLS option instead

On Thu, 26 Dec 2013 09:27:34 -0700 (MST) Warren Block wrote: > On Thu, 26 Dec 2013, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > > On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 09:18:57AM -0700, Warren Block wrote: > >> On Thu, 26 Dec 2013, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > >> > >>> On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 10:55:56PM -0800, Doug Barton w

Re: WITHOUT_NLS is deprecated use NLS option instead

On Thu, 26 Dec 2013, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 09:18:57AM -0700, Warren Block wrote: On Thu, 26 Dec 2013, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 10:55:56PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote: On 12/25/2013 10:51 PM, clutton wrote: Sorry, but I have a quite opposite

Re: WITHOUT_NLS is deprecated use NLS option instead

On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 09:18:57AM -0700, Warren Block wrote: > On Thu, 26 Dec 2013, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > > On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 10:55:56PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote: > >> On 12/25/2013 10:51 PM, clutton wrote: > >>> Sorry, but I have a quite opposite view. Making both variants work mea

Re: WITHOUT_NLS is deprecated use NLS option instead

On Thu, 26 Dec 2013, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 10:55:56PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote: On 12/25/2013 10:51 PM, clutton wrote: Sorry, but I have a quite opposite view. Making both variants work means chaos. More variants means more complication. if || WITHOUT_NLS; then

Re: Resolving circular dependencies

Hi, > On Wed, 25 Dec 2013 23:23:09 -0500 > Erick Turnquist said: jhujhiti> Thank you! I noticed a typo in the new Makefile for jhujhiti> cyrus-sasl2-gssapi. On line 60, MIT_LIB_DEPENDS is set to jhujhiti> libkrb5support.0 instead of libkrb5support.so.0. Once I fixed this, I jhujhiti> was

Re: Resolving circular dependencies

Hi, > On Thu, 26 Dec 2013 12:33:10 +1100 > Dewayne Geraghty said: dewayne> Would it be possible to include some documentation in dewayne> /usr/ports/UPDATING regarding the removal of gssapi from cyrus-sasl2 and dewayne> the creation of the security/cyrus-sasl2-gssapi port; as it will de

ntp-devel-4.2.7p364_2 coredumps

On both 9-stable and 10-stable Dec 26 13:02:04 lokschuppen ntpd[5270]: ntpd 4.2.7p364@1.2483-o Thu Dec 26 12:55:22 UTC 2013 (1): Starting Dec 26 13:02:04 lokschuppen ntpd[5270]: Command line: /usr/local/sbin/ntpd -c /etc/ntp.conf -p /var/run/ntpd.pid -f /var/db/ntpd.drift Dec 26 13:02:05 lokschu

Re: shells/bash-static fails to package/deinstall cleanly

clutton wrote: > On Thu, 2013-12-26 at 11:52 +0200, clutton wrote: > > On Thu, 2013-12-26 at 10:36 +0200, clutton wrote: > > > On Wed, 2013-12-25 at 23:52 -0800, Doug Barton wrote: > > > > Please don't remove people from the CC line. I copied the > > > > maintainer on purpose. > > > > > > > > On

Re: Updating CUPS

On 12/26/2013 12:54, Jerry wrote: > On Wed, 25 Dec 2013 09:14:55 +0100, Matthias Andree stated: > >> Jerry schrieb: >>> The ports latest version of CUPS is 1.5.4; however version 1.7.0 has >>> been out since 10/24/13. Is there any possibility that the latest >>> version will make it into the port

Re: Updating CUPS

On Wed, 25 Dec 2013 09:14:55 +0100, Matthias Andree stated: > Jerry schrieb: > >The ports latest version of CUPS is 1.5.4; however version 1.7.0 has > >been out since 10/24/13. Is there any possibility that the latest > >version will make it into the ports system soon? > > > Careful with what you

Re: shells/bash-static fails to package/deinstall cleanly

On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 01:27:42PM +0200, clutton wrote: > On Thu, 2013-12-26 at 10:51 +, Matthew Seaman wrote: > > On 26/12/2013 10:40, clutton wrote: > > > The whole port because of STATIC option? > > > It'll be better to move this thing to bash port and make it as an > > > option. Like zsh m

Re: shells/bash-static fails to package/deinstall cleanly

On Thu, 2013-12-26 at 10:51 +, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 26/12/2013 10:40, clutton wrote: > > The whole port because of STATIC option? > > It'll be better to move this thing to bash port and make it as an > > option. Like zsh maintainer did. > > It's already an option in the bash port. > > Y

Re: shells/bash-static fails to package/deinstall cleanly

On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 12:40:43PM +0200, clutton wrote: > On Thu, 2013-12-26 at 11:52 +0200, clutton wrote: > > On Thu, 2013-12-26 at 10:36 +0200, clutton wrote: > > > On Wed, 2013-12-25 at 23:52 -0800, Doug Barton wrote: > > > > Please don't remove people from the CC line. I copied the maintainer

Re: shells/bash-static fails to package/deinstall cleanly

On 26/12/2013 10:40, clutton wrote: > The whole port because of STATIC option? > It'll be better to move this thing to bash port and make it as an > option. Like zsh maintainer did. It's already an option in the bash port. You seem somewhat unclear on the concept of slave ports and why they shoul

Re: shells/bash-static fails to package/deinstall cleanly

On Thu, 2013-12-26 at 11:52 +0200, clutton wrote: > On Thu, 2013-12-26 at 10:36 +0200, clutton wrote: > > On Wed, 2013-12-25 at 23:52 -0800, Doug Barton wrote: > > > Please don't remove people from the CC line. I copied the maintainer on > > > purpose. > > > > > > On 12/25/2013 11:40 PM, clutton

Re: WITHOUT_NLS is deprecated use NLS option instead

On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 11:28:01AM +0100, olli hauer wrote: > On 2013-12-26 11:08, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 10:55:56PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote: > >> On 12/25/2013 10:51 PM, clutton wrote: > >>> Sorry, but I have a quite opposite view. Making both variants work means >

Re: WITHOUT_NLS is deprecated use NLS option instead

On 2013-12-26 11:08, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 10:55:56PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote: >> On 12/25/2013 10:51 PM, clutton wrote: >>> Sorry, but I have a quite opposite view. Making both variants work means >>> chaos. More variants means more complication. >> >> if || WITHOUT

Re: WITHOUT_NLS is deprecated use NLS option instead

On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 10:55:56PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote: > On 12/25/2013 10:51 PM, clutton wrote: > > Sorry, but I have a quite opposite view. Making both variants work means > > chaos. More variants means more complication. > > if || WITHOUT_NLS; then > > > This is not chaos. It's called "

Re: shells/bash-static fails to package/deinstall cleanly

On Thu, 2013-12-26 at 10:36 +0200, clutton wrote: > On Wed, 2013-12-25 at 23:52 -0800, Doug Barton wrote: > > Please don't remove people from the CC line. I copied the maintainer on > > purpose. > > > > On 12/25/2013 11:40 PM, clutton wrote: > > > On Wed, 2013-12-25 at 22:06 -0800, Doug Barton wr

Re: Too frequent/poorly tested bsd.port.mk commits, and general uselessness of p5-FreeBSD-Portindex

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 12/26/2013 12:54 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote: | I'll be happy to fix any problems reported to me, but I need to see | reports of problems. Yours is the first mention I've seen of the | problems you mention. Now I know about it, a fix will be forth

Re: Berkeley DB cleanup has apparently broken ports where no db is currently installed

On 12/26/2013 12:41 AM, Matthias Andree wrote: I disagree on the assessments of efforts here. I checked the docs, and the actual .db files are supposed to be compatible, Sure, they are, to some extent, SUPPOSED to be compatible. Experience tells us that is not the case. excepting the corner

Re: Too frequent/poorly tested bsd.port.mk commits, and general uselessness of p5-FreeBSD-Portindex

On 26/12/2013 07:30, Doug Barton wrote: > Speaking of p5-FreeBSD-Portindex generally, I'm wondering what Matthew's > plans are for it? For some time now running 'cache-update -f > svn-up,options' has caused errors related to "WARNING unknown options > file" that seem to have to do with the recent c

Re: Berkeley DB cleanup has apparently broken ports where no db is currently installed

Doug Barton schrieb: >I saw the DEPRECATED notice for my old faithful bdb 4.7, and read the >UPDATING entry related to the pending bdb purge. My first thought was >"That's a total waste of effort, with likely disastrous consequences." >I'm all for removing broken/unused ports. Some of you may

Re: shells/bash-static fails to package/deinstall cleanly

On Wed, 2013-12-25 at 23:52 -0800, Doug Barton wrote: > Please don't remove people from the CC line. I copied the maintainer on > purpose. > > On 12/25/2013 11:40 PM, clutton wrote: > > On Wed, 2013-12-25 at 22:06 -0800, Doug Barton wrote: > >> The problem is that the bash.1 and bashbugs.1 man pa

Re: Too frequent/poorly tested bsd.port.mk commits, and general uselessness of p5-FreeBSD-Portindex

On 12/25/2013 11:30 PM, Doug Barton wrote: I have used Matthew's p5-FreeBSD-Portindex for several years. In the past it was a very valuable tool that allowed me to keep an INDEX up to date relative to changes in the ports tree in seconds or minutes, instead of having to do 'make index' every time

Re: FreeBSD Port: enlightenment-0.17.5,2

Yes, probably it would be better. Please, inform me about the news as I'm _really_ waiting for the working version of Enlightenment. Peter On 25/12/2013 08:24, arrowdodger wrote: On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 6:34 PM, Peter > wrote: Hello, I'm testing E1