Hello,
It's a freebsd 9.2-RELEASE, and the default ports tree (idem for poudrière)
Loïc Blot,
Ingénieur systèmes UNIX, Sécurité et Réseaux
http://www.unix-experience.fr
Lowell Gilbert freebsd-ports-lo...@be-well.ilk.org a écrit :
Loïc Blot loic.b...@unix-experience.fr writes:
Have you got an
Hi Steven,
unfortunately your version is different, especially this part of the code:
SUB_LIST+= GEM_LIB_DIR=${GEM_LIB_DIR} RUBY=${RUBY}
-SUB_FILES= pkg-message
+.if ${PORT_OPTIONS:MNGINX}
+SUB_FILES+=pkg-message-nginx
+PKGMESSAGE=pkg-message-nginx
+.elif
Dear port maintainer,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated,
Hi,
I want to setup my own repo:
[helmut@BSDHelmut1064 ~]$ sudo pkg repo /usr/ports/packages/
/usr/local/etc/ssl/private/BSDHelmut1064.charlieroot.de.key
Generating repository catalog in /usr/ports/packages/: done!
[helmut@BSDHelmut1064 ~]$
[helmut@BSDHelmut1064 ~]$ sudo rsync -arv
Hi,
What do you think, as users and port maintainers, of the idea to
synchronize some high-impact package defaults with Linuxes? My major
concern here, and the reason I'm writing this post, is for package
versions for LAMP and LAPP stacks and making things easier to use pkgng.
For example, for
Good catch on the WITH_APACHEPORT, thats old pre new options hang over,
switched to a straight else, as one or the other must be selected.
Looks like the svn diff didnt show the move, if you run the following:
svn mv files/pkg-message.in files/pkg-message-apache.in
before applying the attached
On 4/16/2014 15:53, Ivan Voras wrote:
What do you think of the idea of syncing versions in general, and this
example of PostgreSQL in particular?
The example of PostgreSQL isn't really good because people have been
asking for change in default for probably two years now. I have no clue
as to
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 5:27 PM, John Marino freebsd.cont...@marino.st wrote:
On 4/16/2014 15:53, Ivan Voras wrote:
What do you think of the idea of syncing versions in general, and this
example of PostgreSQL in particular?
The example of PostgreSQL isn't really good because people have been
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 05:27:43PM +0200, John Marino wrote:
On 4/16/2014 15:53, Ivan Voras wrote:
What do you think of the idea of syncing versions in general, and this
example of PostgreSQL in particular?
The example of PostgreSQL isn't really good because people have been
asking for
Update 2012.1.15 -- 2014.2.15
-
Build ID: 20140416171800-38223
Job owner: c...@freebsd.org
Buildtime: 7 minutes
Enddate: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 17:24:35 GMT
Revision: 351404
[Cross posted across several mailing lists, please respect reply-to.]
WITH_NEW_XORG is now the default on FreeBSD 10 and 9 stable where vt(9)
(aka newcons) is available and ports are used.
Released versions and FreeBSD 8 are unaffected by this.
Binary packages still provide the old xorg
Make QAT happy.
-
Build ID: 20140416192600-17716
Job owner: c...@freebsd.org
Buildtime: 10 minutes
Enddate: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 19:36:12 GMT
Revision: 351414
Repository:
Third attempt to send to the list ( a forwarding of a saved SENT message.)
However another question
In the make.conf there is WITH_NEW_XORG
but I've not the vt(9) driver.
UPDATING is not clear (today 4 16) enough as to wheter WITH_NEW_XORG
should remain, or be replaced with WITHOUT before
On 4/16/14, 9:00 AM, Francois Tigeot wrote:
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 05:27:43PM +0200, John Marino wrote:
On 4/16/2014 15:53, Ivan Voras wrote:
What do you think of the idea of syncing versions in general, and this
example of PostgreSQL in particular?
The example of PostgreSQL isn't really
Em Tue, 15 Apr 2014 10:43:38 -0400, Lowell Gilbert escreveu
Nilton Jose Rizzo ri...@i805.com.br writes:
Hi all, it's strange but the email po...@freebsd.org is the maintaner
of geda port,
That just means it doesn't have a designated maintainer.
i try to install
The most recent update of the port sysutils/hal breaks a whole bunch of
building
updates!
=== Cleaning for hal-0.5.14_24
=== Found saved configuration for hal-0.5.14_24
=== hal-0.5.14_24 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found
=== Fetching all distfiles required by hal-0.5.14_24 for
Unless I'm mistaken, a lots of ports had libraries bumped down (
freetype2, libxcb...), results here are a little short of catastrophic...
I've rebuilt what I could but still...
e.g.
--- XpAttr.lo ---
In file included from XpAttr.c:44:
./XpExtUtil.h:55:20: error: static declaration of
Third attempt to send to the list ( a forwarding of a saved SENT message.)
However another question
In the make.conf there is WITH_NEW_XORG
but I've not the vt(9) driver.
UPDATING is not clear (today 4 16) enough as to wheter WITH_NEW_XORG
should remain, or be replaced with WITHOUT before
Hey folks,
I'm having a heck of a time with the rsync port in our build system with
latest ports:
commit 08b15d01e41c418b5c5b35fb5b691f5e83d40a95
Author: wg w...@freebsd.org
Date: Wed Apr 16 23:17:53 2014 +
devel/py-hgsubversion: update to 1.6 and use auto plist
This is the error
On 4/16/2014 7:40 PM, O. Hartmann wrote:
The most recent update of the port sysutils/hal breaks a whole bunch of
building
updates!
=== Cleaning for hal-0.5.14_24
=== Found saved configuration for hal-0.5.14_24
=== hal-0.5.14_24 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found
===
20 matches
Mail list logo
