Re: Done with this port

2014-05-21 Thread Matthias Andree
Am 21.05.2014 23:58, schrieb Patrick Powell: > Mathias, I think that brief description of how you did this would be > VERY useful to some of us looking at this problem and not knowing where > to start. Perhaps an: 'this is the way it was' and a 'this is the way > it should be' document would be

Re: Done with this port

2014-05-21 Thread Michelle Sullivan
Bob Eager wrote: > On Wed, 21 May 2014 14:58:32 -0700 > Patrick Powell wrote: > > >> Mathias, I think that brief description of how you did this would be >> VERY useful to some of us looking at this problem and not knowing >> where to start. Perhaps an: 'this is the way it was' and a 'this

Re: Poudriere & Haskell ports "Options changed, deleting" every time

2014-05-21 Thread Gabor Pali
2014-05-21 17:24 GMT+02:00 J David : > Probably there is some > widget in the lang/ghc package that's needed to build the > documentation. Yes, there is. That is called Haddock, the documentation tool similar to Javadoc and Doxygen. Since it parses the same source code as the compiler itself, an

Re: Done with this port

2014-05-21 Thread Bob Eager
On Wed, 21 May 2014 14:58:32 -0700 Patrick Powell wrote: > Mathias, I think that brief description of how you did this would be > VERY useful to some of us looking at this problem and not knowing > where to start. Perhaps an: 'this is the way it was' and a 'this is > the way it should be' doc

Re: Done with this port

2014-05-21 Thread Patrick Powell
On 05/20/14 22:10, Matthias Andree wrote: Am 21.05.2014 03:49, schrieb Paul Schmehl: Thanks. With some of my ports I have been really struggling trying to get staging working. I'd be very interested to see what you did, since it was apparently easy for you to do. A bit of experience with pac

LandR Launch

2014-05-21 Thread Reed Thomas Lawrence
Good afternoon I wanted to get in touch and let you know we just launched LandR which is the worlds first intelligent online mastering service. It's a spectral analysis system that listens to music and detects detailed features in the audio signals to give a studio-quality master. Here's a lin

bsd.emacs.mk does not detect non-GUI, non-X11 options

2014-05-21 Thread Vick Khera
All of my freebsd boxes are headless, and I build all ports without X11. To accomplish this, I specify in make.conf the following: WITHOUT_GNOME=yes WITHOUT_X11=yes OPTIONS_UNSET=X11 GUI I have to specify both WITHOUT_X11 and OPTIONS_UNSET since I have found some ports to not honor OPTIONS_UNSET

Re: Disappearing programs: Is FreeBSD ports unmaintained?

2014-05-21 Thread Big Lebowski
Dear Joerg, The only problem is that if such port is unmaintained (its maintainer email address is po...@freebsd.org) there's no one who could do such thing, because commiters are busy working on the entire ports tree, and apparently no one from maintainers was interested in the port to do so. If

Re: Poudriere & Haskell ports "Options changed, deleting" every time

2014-05-21 Thread J David
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 2:07 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote: > Try > > CHECK_CHANGED_OPTIONS=verbose > > in /usr/local/etc/poudriere.conf ? Great suggestion, thanks! With just one Haskell port, hs-text, here's what happens: >> Calculating ports order and dependencies >> Sanity checking the r

[QAT] 354749: 4x leftovers

2014-05-21 Thread Ports-QAT
Update distinfo since the DESCRIPTION file was updated when the module was marked as orphaned - Build ID: 20140521124600-3594 Job owner: skreu...@freebsd.org Buildtime: 16 minutes Enddate:

Disappearing programs: Is FreeBSD ports unmaintained?

2014-05-21 Thread Joerg Schilling
Hi, the programs star and smake seem to have disappeared from the FreeBSD ports collection. The supposed reason is: "no longer compiles" but it seems that the real reason is that somebody did modify the build system in a way that harms portability and this way caused a FreeBSD change (intro

databases/qdbm fails

2014-05-21 Thread Andreas Nilsson
Hello, databases/qdbm port fails to build on 9.2 amd64, see attached log. I would guess it ignores CFLAGS. Best regards Andreas qdbm-1.8.78_1.log Description: Binary data ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/lis

FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date

2014-05-21 Thread portscout
Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you

Re: Staging issue with staging of net-im/libpurple (libtool?)

2014-05-21 Thread Tijl Coosemans
On Wed, 21 May 2014 11:26:57 +0200 Dominic Fandrey wrote: > On 20/05/2014 22:13, Tijl Coosemans wrote: >> On Tue, 20 May 2014 08:52:46 -0700 Kevin Oberman wrote: >>> Removed the FIND and re-built. After the build I looked in >>> stage/usr/local/lib and the .so.0 files are still present! I then inst

Re: firefox-29.0,1 -- dumps core

2014-05-21 Thread Marat N.Afanasyev
Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: Please allow me to clarify two things: 1) The exact set of build options that are needed in order to reproduce the crash I have reported are as follows: DBUS (enabled by default) GIO (enabled by default) GSTREAMER (enabled by default)

Re: Staging issue with staging of net-im/libpurple (libtool?)

2014-05-21 Thread Dominic Fandrey
On 20/05/2014 22:13, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > On Tue, 20 May 2014 08:52:46 -0700 Kevin Oberman wrote: >> Removed the FIND and re-built. After the build I looked in >> stage/usr/local/lib and the .so.0 files are still present! I then installed >> with no errors. I'll admit that I don't understand wha

mail/postfix-current failing

2014-05-21 Thread Jakob Breivik Grimstveit
[jakobbg@core2 /usr/ports/mail/postfix-current]$ sudo make distclean && sudo make ===> Cleaning for postfix-base-2.12.20140507,4 ===> Deleting distfiles for postfix-base-2.12.20140507,4 ===> License IPL10 accepted by the user ===> Found saved configuration for postfix-base-2.12.20140507,4 ===>

FreeBSD ports which are currently marked forbidden

2014-05-21 Thread linimon
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically notify users about ports that are marked as "forbidden" in their Makefiles. Often, these ports are so marked due to security concerns, such as known exploits. An overview of each port, inclu

FreeBSD ports which are currently scheduled for deletion

2014-05-21 Thread linimon
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically schedule removal of ports that have been judged to have outlived their usefulness. Often, this is due to a better alternative having become available and/or the cessation of development on th

Re: PORT META: Installed files conflict between ports

2014-05-21 Thread Łukasz Wąsikowski
W dniu 2014-05-21 03:53, Robert Backhaus pisze: > The fact that those two ports install conflicting binaries isn't a problem. > The problem is that you were allowed to install the second port. > > With mplayer, there is a correct CONFLICTS line in mplayer2, but does not > appear to be one in mpla

FreeBSD unmaintained ports which are currently scheduled for deletion

2014-05-21 Thread linimon
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically schedule removal of ports that have been judged to have outlived their usefulness. Often, this is due to a better alternative having become available and/or the cessation of development on th

FreeBSD unmaintained ports which are currently marked broken

2014-05-21 Thread linimon
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically notify users of ports that are marked as "broken" in their Makefiles. In many cases these ports are failing to compile on some subset of the FreeBSD build environments. The most common probl

FreeBSD ports which are currently marked broken

2014-05-21 Thread linimon
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically notify users of ports that are marked as "broken" in their Makefiles. In many cases these ports are failing to compile on some subset of the FreeBSD build environments. The most common probl