. Sort packing list.
-
Build ID: 20140629064200-57013
Job owner: gle...@freebsd.org
Buildtime: 16 minutes
Enddate: Sun, 29 Jun 2014 06:58:21 GMT
Revision: 359734
Repository:
. Fix COMMENT.
-
Build ID: 20140629064200-5336
Job owner: gle...@freebsd.org
Buildtime: 13 minutes
Enddate: Sun, 29 Jun 2014 06:55:00 GMT
Revision: 359733
Repository:
. Fix COMMENT.
-
Build ID: 20140629064200-38158
Job owner: gle...@freebsd.org
Buildtime: 11 minutes
Enddate: Sun, 29 Jun 2014 06:53:07 GMT
Revision: 359732
Repository:
> > Trying to build x11-wm/icewm, I ran into a roadblock with a dependency,
> > devel/gobject-introspection
> > which is also a dependency for other important things.
> > gmake[1]: Leaving directory
> > `/usr/ports/devel/gobject-introspection/work11.amd64
> > /gobject-introspection-1.36.0'
. Support staging.
-
Build ID: 20140629064005-43410
Job owner: gle...@freebsd.org
Buildtime: 10 minutes
Enddate: Sun, 29 Jun 2014 06:49:53 GMT
Revision: 359731
Repository:
. Support staging.
-
Build ID: 20140629064004-4248
Job owner: gle...@freebsd.org
Buildtime: 8 minutes
Enddate: Sun, 29 Jun 2014 06:48:21 GMT
Revision: 359730
Repository:
. Support staging.
-
Build ID: 20140629063801-10543
Job owner: gle...@freebsd.org
Buildtime: 9 minutes
Enddate: Sun, 29 Jun 2014 06:47:13 GMT
Revision: 359729
Repository:
. Support staging.
-
Build ID: 20140629063801-53236
Job owner: gle...@freebsd.org
Buildtime: 5 minutes
Enddate: Sun, 29 Jun 2014 06:43:08 GMT
Revision: 359728
Repository:
I've just been setting this up, and had a question and a couple of notes.
Originally, I just installed icinga2. The icinga2 port does not depend on
icinga, but appears to need it. Is this really a dependency, or are the
two ports meant to be separate?
The icinga.conf-sample does not appear
. Staging support.
-
Build ID: 20140629000601-42246
Job owner: gle...@freebsd.org
Buildtime: 48 minutes
Enddate: Sun, 29 Jun 2014 00:54:19 GMT
Revision: 359725
Repository:
Support staging.
-
Build ID: 20140628122000-35131
Job owner: nobut...@freebsd.org
Buildtime: 12 hours
Enddate: Sat, 28 Jun 2014 23:56:46 GMT
Revision: 359689
Repository:
Hello :-)
Is it possible to set GH_COMMIT variable to something else than a
commit in order to fetch a HEAD? I would like to give user an option
to fetch stable release (a default) and also the head in order to
easily build and test development release :-)
Any hints appreciated :-)
Tomek
--
CeD
On Sat, 28 Jun 2014 19:18:25 +, Marcin Wisnicki wrote:
> Is there a simple way to test port without building its dependencies,
> instead fetching them from package repository.
>
> I've tried `poudriere testport` but it wants to build everything.
>
Please ignore first "without" in subject, i
Is there a simple way to test port without building its dependencies,
instead fetching them from package repository.
I've tried `poudriere testport` but it wants to build everything.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/m
On 24.6.2014, at 19.25, Kimmo Paasiala wrote:
> Hello,
>
> There’s not a whole lot of people who even know this but it used to be that a
> port could be installed without registering it in the package database by
> specifying NO_PKG_REGISTER=1 on make(1) command line. It’s not documented
>
On 28.06.2014, at 15:50, Michael Grimm wrote:
> spamassassin-3.4.0_11 and p5-Net-DNS-0.76 worked as expected. After upgrading
> to p5-Net-DNS-0.77 I ran into an issue that looked similar to the one
> reported above. spamd couldn't be daemonized at start-up (timed out). After
> some investigati
On Sat, 28 Jun 2014, Daniel Eischen wrote:
I'm well into my 2 week quest to update my ports from a Feb 2014
build to now (June). One of the last issues is libexosip2-legacy
failing to build with this:
I fixed this by removing package net/libosip2 and instead
installing net/libosip.
--
DElibt
I'm well into my 2 week quest to update my ports from a Feb 2014
build to now (June). One of the last issues is libexosip2-legacy
failing to build with this:
eXconf.c:1103:6: warning: implicit declaration of function 'timercmp' is
invalid in C99 [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
if (osi
On 25.06.2014, at 17:21, Michael Grimm wrote:
> On 24.06.2014, at 12:57, Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote:
>> Op 24 jun. 2014, om 12:07 heeft Kurt Jaeger het volgende
>> geschreven:
>>> If you still see the problem, can you provide more details ?
>>> What did you test ? What was the output ?
>>
>>
Dear port maintainer,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you
Hi!
> Trying to build x11-wm/icewm, I ran into a roadblock with a dependency,
> devel/gobject-introspection
> which is also a dependency for other important things.
>
> gmake[1]: Leaving directory
> `/usr/ports/devel/gobject-introspection/work11.amd64
> /gobject-introspection-1.36.0'
Trying to build x11-wm/icewm, I ran into a roadblock with a dependency,
devel/gobject-introspection
which is also a dependency for other important things.
gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/devel/gobject-introspection/work11.amd64
/gobject-introspection-1.36.0'
Trying to build x11-wm/icewm, I ran into a roadblock with a dependency,
devel/gobject-introspection
which is also a dependency for other important things.
gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/devel/gobject-introspection/work11.amd64
/gobject-introspection-1.36.0'
Trying to build x11-wm/icewm, I ran into a roadblock with a dependency,
devel/gobject-introspection
which is also a dependency for other important things.
gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/devel/gobject-introspection/work11.amd64
/gobject-introspection-1.36.0'
24 matches
Mail list logo
