Hi!
I've created RP with solution for zabbix2-server
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191731
Zabbix22-server doen't have such problem now.
2014-05-14 11:42 GMT+04:00 Pavel Timofeev tim...@gmail.com:
Hi!
After this commit to regular ports tree both zabbix (2.0 and 2.2)
ports
Hi,
I just had some difficulties to update from NUT 2.6.5 to the actual release and
wanted to share with you what I changed:
the blazer_usb driver that i use need a PIDPATH and a STATEPATH. both are on
/var/db/nut as a standard. In my mind that is the wrong directory and should be
Michelle Sullivan wrote:
First,
Thanks Matthew and Dimitry, and indeed Jesse is still listed as the
maintainer - however I have had no reply from him over the last few
weeks, I could be wrong but I think he no longer works for Best Practical.
Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 03/07/2014 03:52,
Hello, FreeBSD.
How to properly force port to depend on devel/libelf port? This doesn't work:
LIB_DEPENDS= libelf.so:${PORTSDIR}/devel/libelf
Port system picks up /usr/lib/libelf.so even if devel/libelf is not
installed :(
--
// Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov l...@freebsd.org
Hi all,
A helpful someone submitted a PR with a patch for a port I maintain. I
remember that back in the GNATS days, when this happened I had to reply to
an e-mail if I approved of the patch. But with Bugzilla I'm not sure. I
added a comment to the PR that said Maintainer approved, but I don't
Hi!
A helpful someone submitted a PR with a patch for a port I maintain. I
remember that back in the GNATS days, when this happened I had to reply to
an e-mail if I approved of the patch. But with Bugzilla I'm not sure. I
added a comment to the PR that said Maintainer approved, but I don't
On Tue, 8 Jul 2014 13:54:42 +0200 A.J. 'Fonz' van Werven wrote:
A helpful someone submitted a PR with a patch for a port I maintain. I
remember that back in the GNATS days, when this happened I had to reply to
an e-mail if I approved of the patch. But with Bugzilla I'm not sure. I
added a
I've received the following removal notice for 2 ports for which, as a
maintainer, I submitted 2 weeks ago a PR to support staging.
So far, I got no news about my PR, nor my patch, nor my reply.
What did I miss in my PR? What is needed to get some generous soul to
commit my patch?
Thanks in
Tijl Coosemans wrote:
So, in short: with the new Bugzilla system, how does a maintainer (who
is not a committer) respond to a PR in order to get the patch committed?
Set Status field to Patch Ready.
I've had a long, hard look at the Bugzilla page, but I can't find any way
to change the
Kurt Jaeger wrote:
A short mail to ports@ with can some committer please commit PR ... is
one way to find one. It might get noisy in the future 8-}
That sounds a bit cumbersome, but I'll give it a try. Thanks.
AvW
--
Imbibo, ergo sum.
pgpJIxZgYfre6.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
just a small correction to the english man pages for the next release:
the name of month in the page footer has a funny (for a Norwegian) character
set:
.TH FLOW-TOOLS 1 26 \xd0\x90\xd0\xb2\xd0\xb3\xd1\x83\xd1\x81\xd1\x82 2010
More important - I find Netflow and flow-tools very useful.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191725
I am the maintainer of said port and approve the patch that comes with
this PR, so I'd appreciate it if somebody can commit it.
Thanks in advance,
AvW
--
Imbibo, ergo sum.
pgpbunNbioHD1.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi!
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191725
I am the maintainer of said port and approve the patch that comes with
this PR, so I'd appreciate it if somebody can commit it.
Done. Sorry, I only saw at the end that mandree@ was the submitter 8-(
He could have committed it
After the last port update of php I get this error:
openssl_verify(): Don't know how to get public key from this private
key in
/usr/local/www/x1/x2/x3/services/Signing/Services_Signing_Openssl.php
on line 32
PHP Warning: openssl_verify(): supplied key param cannot be coerced
Kurt Jaeger wrote:
Done.
Thanks. So the PR can be closed now.
AvW
--
Imbibo, ergo sum.
pgp34tsF0taGp.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On 08 июля 2014 г., at 14:19, Michelle Sullivan miche...@sorbs.net wrote:
Michelle Sullivan wrote:
First,
Thanks Matthew and Dimitry, and indeed Jesse is still listed as the
maintainer - however I have had no reply from him over the last few
weeks, I could be wrong but I think he no
On Fri, 4 Jul 2014 19:18:17 +0200
Tijl Coosemans t...@freebsd.org wrote:
If you build c-icap with the POSIXSEM option enabled does that make
any difference?
I have recompiled c-icap with POSIXMEM option enabled, also squidclamav
afterwards. It didn't take longer than 5 minutes for c-icap to
On 2014-07-08 09:40, Martin Smith wrote:
I am just installing apcupsd on a new 10.0R system, the package mesg
says to comment out uhid in the kernel conf, but it does not seem to
be there anyway.
The apcupsd website suggest commenting out uhid and enabling ugen, but
they only seem to mention up
I am just installing apcupsd on a new 10.0R system, the package mesg
says to comment out uhid in the kernel conf, but it does not seem to be
there anyway.
The apcupsd website suggest commenting out uhid and enabling ugen, but
they only seem to mention up to FBSD 7.x.
Can anyone give me any
Dmitry Sivachenko wrote:
Did you file an issue for RT at https://bestpractical.com/rt/issues.html ?
I filed a bug on CPAN against DBIx::SearchBuilder
Here:
https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=96902
Michelle
--
Michelle Sullivan
http://www.mhix.org/
On 08/07/2014 15:45, Larry Rosenman wrote:
On 2014-07-08 09:40, Martin Smith wrote:
I am just installing apcupsd on a new 10.0R system, the package mesg
says to comment out uhid in the kernel conf, but it does not seem to
be there anyway.
The apcupsd website suggest commenting out uhid and
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 11:24 AM, Anton Shterenlikht me...@bris.ac.uk
wrote:
From a daily log:
Checking negative group permissions:
55224447 -rw-r--r-x 1 root wheel 3672 Jun 19 23:55:12 2014
/usr/local/share/gnome/help/services-admin/nl/legal.xml
55224448 -rw-r--r-x 1 root wheel 7330
Remove NOPORTDOCS and NOPORTEXAMPLES.
Approved by:portmgr (blanket)
-
Build ID: 20140704005400-18135
Job owner: ad...@freebsd.org
Buildtime: 5 days
Enddate: Tue, 08 Jul 2014
Kevin Oberman rkober...@gmail.com writes:
It's just that there are cases where negative group permissions are
intended and this is such a case. If you don't want to see them, add
daily_status_security_neggrpperm_enable=NO to /etc/periodic.conf.
I added a hack to work around this without
- Use new LIB_DEPENDS syntax
- Convert USE_XZ to USES
- Stagify
- Switch to USES=libtool, drop .la files
Approved by:portmgr blanket
-
Build ID: 20140704074001-49201
Job owner: amd...@freebsd.org
Michelle Sullivan wrote:
Dmitry Sivachenko wrote:
Did you file an issue for RT at https://bestpractical.com/rt/issues.html ?
I filed a bug on CPAN against DBIx::SearchBuilder
Here:
https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=96902
Michelle
FYI Alex (BP) just replied
On 09 июля 2014 г., at 0:10, Michelle Sullivan miche...@sorbs.net wrote:
Michelle Sullivan wrote:
Dmitry Sivachenko wrote:
Did you file an issue for RT at https://bestpractical.com/rt/issues.html ?
I filed a bug on CPAN against DBIx::SearchBuilder
Here:
On 2014-07-06 12:18, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
Author: tijl
Date: Sun Jul 6 10:18:36 2014
New Revision: 360871
URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/360871
QAT: https://qat.redports.org/buildarchive/r360871/
Log:
The old pkg_install is buggy with @cwd. Just install the module
On Tue, 08 Jul 2014 23:51:38 +0200 olli hauer wrote:
On 2014-07-06 12:18, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
Author: tijl
Date: Sun Jul 6 10:18:36 2014
New Revision: 360871
URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/360871
QAT: https://qat.redports.org/buildarchive/r360871/
Log:
The old
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191291
The bug report explains my issue, but long story short, I cannot get
devel/mingw32-gcc to build in order to properly verify that it is being staged
as well as updated to the GCC that MinGW supports. I have tried all that I can,
but I do
Support stage for texlive, given it is impossible to rebuild the fmt files into
the stage then they are now rebuild in post-installation, like it is done in
other package system
-
Build ID: 20140704173600-19435
Job
Hi,
I notice that many pkgs are dependent upon postgresql client 9.2. I have
9.3 on this machine, when I try to install or upgrade packages which are
linked to 9.2, the process fails. All the errors are about documentation
files installed in same path.
Simple example.
# pkg install mapnik
The
32 matches
Mail list logo
