Hello!
On Sat, 2 Aug 2014, Matthew Pounsett wrote:
It looks to me like the rules that WANT_PHP_WEB uses to decide whether
to build the CGI or module version of PHP will always choose the CGI
version unless the module is already installed. If this is true, it
means that in automated build
Greetings,
please bear with me if not using proper terms to describe the situation,
I am not an Objective-C programmer.
There are reports that openvpn-auth-ldap fails on FreeBSD 10, and
apparently also on 9, and I am unable to debug this.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190497
Dear port maintainer,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated,
OK, here are the results of my initial tests. See ++ TEST ++ at
the end of these notes for the results
Sun Aug 3 07:01:46 PDT 2014
I started with FreeBSD 93, perl5.16
test94: {90} # uname -a
FreeBSD test94.private 9.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.3-RELEASE #0 r268512:
Thu Jul 10 23:44:39 UTC 2014
Here are the build.log and test.log files mentioned in this posting
On 08/03/14 07:09, Patrick Powell wrote:
OK, here are the results of my initial tests. See ++ TEST ++ at
the end of these notes for the results
Sun Aug 3 07:01:46 PDT 2014
I started with FreeBSD 93, perl5.16
test94: {90} #
Looks like either the attachments are too large or they do not have an
acceptable mime-type
as described in
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handboohttp://www.freebsd.org
On 08/03/14 07:16, Patrick Powell wrote:
Here are the build.log and test.log files mentioned in this
On 02 Aug 2014, at 02:47, Steve Kargl s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu wrote:
% portmaster --force-config math/lapack
(Select to build/install profiled libraries)
=== Port directory: /usr/ports/math/lapack
=== This port is marked IGNORE
=== you have chosen WITH_PROFILE, but
On 2014-08-01 23:34, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
Hi!
Question: when will mod_perl be available for Apache 24?
There's a PR where people are discussing this:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191471
This PR needs more testers etc.
I've updated the PR with a patch against the
On Aug 3, 2014, at 02:07 , Melvyn Sopacua mel...@magemana.nl wrote:
I don't see the problem.
If you want the mod_php module in your port set WANT_PHP_MOD.
If you don't care which implementation it is as long as it can speak
with a webserver, you set WANT_PHP_WEB.
The WANT_PHP_WEB knob
On Sun, Aug 03, 2014 at 05:28:12PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 02 Aug 2014, at 02:47, Steve Kargl s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu
wrote:
% portmaster --force-config math/lapack
(Select to build/install profiled libraries)
=== Port directory: /usr/ports/math/lapack
===
Hi Matthew,
On Sun, 3 Aug 2014, Matthew Pounsett wrote:
On Aug 3, 2014, at 02:07 , Melvyn Sopacua mel...@magemana.nl wrote:
For automated builds use the OPTIONS framework. Tinderbox can handle
that just fine.
Right, and I’m speaking from the perspective of the admin building the
port, not
I've been noticing this whenever I do a 'pkg version -v', it shows some ports as
being different from the INDEX, but when I check the actual port, it isn't the
same version that 'pkg version' shows. I usually rebuild my INDEX manually after
doing an svn update, so I'm wondering if this is pkg
At the end of last month I used send-pr to post a maintainer-update to
security/bro and security/broccoli. I see now I should have used the new
bugzilla web interface. That day I received a request an email asking
for maintainer approval. I immediately replied to that but the status is
still
I’m having trouble updating the sysutils/bacula-server port to 7.0.4. This is
a packaging issue, not a ‘does it run’ issue. Regression testing is fine (see
comment below).
I have https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191311 nearly
finished. The blocking issue arises with
On 03/08/2014 18:35, Craig Leres wrote:
At the end of last month I used send-pr to post a maintainer-update to
security/bro and security/broccoli. I see now I should have used the new
bugzilla web interface. That day I received a request an email asking
for maintainer approval. I immediately
On 08/03/14 14:57, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 03/08/2014 18:33, Naram Qashat wrote:
I've been noticing this whenever I do a 'pkg version -v', it shows some
ports as being different from the INDEX, but when I check the actual
port, it isn't the same version that 'pkg version' shows. I usually
On 03/08/2014 20:34, Naram Qashat wrote:
Well, I've been using the command line arguments of -voL '=', and
looking at the man page for pkg-version, as far as I can tell, it
shouldn't be downloading INDEX, since I do have INDEX-9 on my system.
pkg(8) doesn't download or attempt to build an
On 08/03/14 15:53, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 03/08/2014 20:34, Naram Qashat wrote:
Well, I've been using the command line arguments of -voL '=', and
looking at the man page for pkg-version, as far as I can tell, it
shouldn't be downloading INDEX, since I do have INDEX-9 on my system.
pkg(8)
On 02 Aug 2014, at 16:04, O. Hartmann ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de wrote:
Am Sat, 2 Aug 2014 15:30:36 +0200
Michael Gmelin gre...@freebsd.org schrieb:
On 02 Aug 2014, at 15:17, O. Hartmann ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de wrote:
Update of port windowmaker fails during registration
On 08/03/14 08:25, olli hauer wrote:
On 2014-08-01 23:34, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
Hi!
Question: when will mod_perl be available for Apache 24?
There's a PR where people are discussing this:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191471
This PR needs more testers etc.
I've updated
On Aug 3, 2014, at 2:26 PM, Dan Langille d...@langille.org wrote:
See that 5? I think it should be a 7. I have no idea where the 5 is coming
from. It should be the value from LIBBACCATS_LT_RELEASE
A grep for that gives (not all lines are included here):
# grep -r
On 08/03/14 12:18, Matthew Seaman wrote:
I take it you mean PR 192105 ?
(Sorry, I meant to include a link to the PR.)
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192105
By virtue of sending a PR into the system a le...@ee.lbl.gov account
will have been created in Bugzilla. You should
On Sun, Aug 3, 2014 at 1:27 PM, Naram Qashat cyberb...@cyberbotx.com
wrote:
On 08/03/14 15:53, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 03/08/2014 20:34, Naram Qashat wrote:
Well, I've been using the command line arguments of -voL '=', and
looking at the man page for pkg-version, as far as I can tell, it
On 08/03/14 21:24, Kevin Oberman wrote:
On Sun, Aug 3, 2014 at 1:27 PM, Naram Qashat cyberb...@cyberbotx.com
mailto:cyberb...@cyberbotx.com wrote:
On 08/03/14 15:53, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 03/08/2014 20:34, Naram Qashat wrote:
Well, I've been using the command line
portmaster print/acroread9 ends with
===Verifying install for /compat/linux/lib/libexpat.so.1 in
/usr/ports/textproc/linux-f10-expat
=== linux-f10-expat-2.0.1 is forbidden:
http://www.freshports.org/vuxml.php?vid=5f030587-e39a-11de-881e-001aa0166822.
*** Error code 1
Stop.
make[2]:
Am 03.08.2014 um 17:58 schrieb Steve Kargl:
I probably make the necessary changes in my local tree and
move on.
If you can work around it, you can also submit a patch for the port.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
26 matches
Mail list logo
