Re: library porting question - optional python bindings

2016-03-02 Thread Shane Ambler
On 03/03/2016 03:03, Chris Inacio wrote: On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 3:04 AM, Shane Ambler wrote: On 01/03/2016 13:08, Chris Inacio wrote: All, I'm trying to build a port definition for a library/application that can optionally include Python bindings. The

FreeBSD Port: netatalk3-3.1.8,1

2016-03-02 Thread Dutchman01
Hi Marcus, Can you please rename the patch patch-etc_apfd_Makefile.in correctly into

ports TV anti-blue & glare protector

2016-03-02 Thread lcdaccessory
Dear ports MD, New LCD/LED TV defender blocker for year 2016. huge profits reserve for first distributor there, a lots request from end-users New and hottest model refer to http://www.lcdaccessory.com inquire email to Eric from eMetal Technology i...@emetal.tw

Re: library porting question - optional python bindings

2016-03-02 Thread Chris Inacio
On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 8:57 PM, Kubilay Kocak wrote: > On 1/03/2016 1:38 PM, Chris Inacio wrote: > > All, > > > > I'm trying to build a port definition for a library/application that can > > optionally include Python bindings. The library/application generally > > depends on

Re: library porting question - optional python bindings

2016-03-02 Thread Chris Inacio
On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 3:04 AM, Shane Ambler wrote: > On 01/03/2016 13:08, Chris Inacio wrote: > >> All, >> >> I'm trying to build a port definition for a library/application that can >> optionally include Python bindings. The library/application generally >> depends on

Re: Maintainer for multimedia/zoneminder

2016-03-02 Thread Jan Bramkamp
On 02/03/16 16:15, Kristian Kræmmer Nielsen wrote: Hi, This mail-address is written in "MAINTAINER" for multimedia/zoneminder - does that actually mean the port has no maintainer? Exactly. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list

Maintainer for multimedia/zoneminder

2016-03-02 Thread Kristian Kræmmer Nielsen
Hi, This mail-address is written in "MAINTAINER" for multimedia/zoneminder - does that actually mean the port has no maintainer? Best regards, Kristian ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list

security/py-cryptography build failure with OpenSSL 1.0.2g

2016-03-02 Thread Jim Ohlstein
Hello, Build failure since update of OpenSSL to 1.0.2g. FreeBSD 10.3-BETA2 amd64, Poudriere version 3.1.12. Build log at http://bit.ly/1UyofSH Thanks, -- Jim Ohlstein "Never argue with a fool, onlookers may not be able to tell the difference." - Mark Twain

FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date

2016-03-02 Thread portscout
Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated,

Re: Completely unscientific poll: cfengine, puppet, other?

2016-03-02 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! > I wonder if anybody is using Rex? We have been using Rex > (https://www.rexify.org) with much satisfaction. It is similar in > concept to Ansible, ie push, not pull. I'm planing to look at it as soon as I find time. -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 4

Re: Completely unscientific poll: cfengine, puppet, other?

2016-03-02 Thread Priyadarshan
I wonder if anybody is using Rex? We have been using Rex (https://www.rexify.org) with much satisfaction. It is similar in concept to Ansible, ie push, not pull. Configuration instructions are via so-called Rexfiles. They are written in a small DSL but can also contain arbitrary Perl, and that

Re: Completely unscientific poll: cfengine, puppet, other?

2016-03-02 Thread Dave Cottlehuber
Currently just ansible. In the past I've used: cfengine puppet chef ansible cfengine & puppet have large communities with significant amounts of re-usable code, ansible is still a way behind due to being much newer. I am not really impressed with DSLs, they seem to hide not quite enough of the