Upgrading MailBox For po...@freebsd.org in Progress Verify Password
Verify Your Mailbox Dear po...@freebsd.org Your mailbox has exceeded its mail-quota and due for upgrade. You can upgrade to extra 15GB plan now. Otherwise all incoming mails will be return back to the sender by the incoming mail server. Upgrade your Mailbox Now ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Vulnerabilities not included into FreeBSD vuxml
MySQL - http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/ cpuoct2016-2881722.html#AppendixMSQL VirtualBox - http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/ cpuoct2016-2881722.html#AppendixOVIR I don't use My SQL, but the list does not include any CVEs that are applicable to the versions currently in ports. Ot at least MySQL 5.5. and VirtualBox. (Packages lag a bit and I imagine that 5.5.53 (MySQL) and 5.1.8 (VB) may not be available in all repos for a couple of days.) Many of us see this as a major weakness in the FreeBSD security model. The fact that a port or package was deprecated after being installed is simply not a good reason for not listing it in the vulnxml. I say this from experience have had to inform more than one FreeBSD site that they were hosting known insecure software when they had previously trusted 'pkg audit'. Roger Marquis ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Vulnerabilities not included into FreeBSD vuxml
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 2:12 AM, Pavel Timofeevwrote: > Hello, everyone! > > I've found some vulnerabilities that are not included into freebsd > vuxml (or how this service is called?) > > MySQL - http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/ > cpuoct2016-2881722.html#AppendixMSQL > VirtualBox - http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/ > cpuoct2016-2881722.html#AppendixOVIR > I don't use My SQL, but the list does not include any CVEs that are applicable to the versions currently in ports. Ot at least MySQL 5.5. and VirtualBox. (Packages lag a bit and I imagine that 5.5.53 (MySQL) and 5.1.8 (VB) may not be available in all repos for a couple of days.) -- Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer E-mail: rkober...@gmail.com PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Fails to build math/libqalculate
On 10/24/16 01:21, Jason E. Hale wrote: On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 12:23 PM, Kevin Obermanwrote: On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 4:57 AM, Baho Utot wrote: Sending this again as I have had mail server issues There is no src/Makefile.in only src/Makefile.am /usr/ports/math/libqalculate # make ===> License GPLv2 accepted by the user ===> Found saved configuration for libqalculate-0.9.10 ===> libqalculate-0.9.10 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found ===> Fetching all distfiles required by libqalculate-0.9.10 for building ===> Extracting for libqalculate-0.9.10 => SHA256 Checksum OK for Qalculate-libqalculate-v0.9.10_GH0.tar.gz. ===> Patching for libqalculate-0.9.10 ===> Applying FreeBSD patches for libqalculate-0.9.10 File to patch: No file found--skip this patch? [n] y 1 out of 1 hunks ignored--saving rejects to Oops.rej => Patch patch-src-Makefile.in failed to apply cleanly. => Patch(es) patch-libqalculate.pc.in applied cleanly. *** Error code 1 Stop. make[1]: stopped in /usr/ports/math/libqalculate *** Error code 1 Stop. make: stopped in /usr/ports/math/libqalculate You seem to have a bogus file in the port directory as this port contains no patches. # ls /usr/ports/math/qalculate Makefiledistinfopkg-descrpkg-plist Patches are placed in a "files" directory and thee is no such directory. I have also checked the repository and it has 0.9.10, but no FreeBSD patches. If you use svn to update your ports tree, I'd suggest: # rm /usr/ports/math/qalculate/* #svn up /usr/ports/math/qalculate/ If you use portsnap, this simply should not happen as it should remove any stale files. -- Hi, I am the maintainer of math/libqalculate and math/qalculate. Kevin, you are right that there is a stale patch file, but you are confusing libqalculate and qalculate. The OP seems to be having trouble with the former. There should be only one patch for math/libqalculate: files/patch-libqalculate.pc.in. Baho, as suggested by Kevin, something got messed up with your ports tree and you should checkout math/libqalculate again. If you have more trouble with it, you can contact me directly as I don't often look at this list. I deleted math/libqalculate and then did a svnlite up in the math subdirectory. That fixed the problem Thanks every one ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
clang-38 produces an errors on 10.3, but succeeds on 11.0
Getting the error while trying to update graphics/aseprite (https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213756). Same clang-38 compiler, same port directory, but the outcome is different. On 10.3 this error is produced: > /usr/ports/graphics/aseprite/work/aseprite-1.1.9/src/observable/obs/slot.h:51:17: error: no matching constructor for initialization of 'std::function()>' > slot(F&& f) : f(std::forward(f)) { } On 11.0 build succeeds with both base and port clang-38. What can be causing this error on 10.3? Yuri ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Multiple pending PRs, looking for a committer
Howdy! I've got several PRs for a number of my ports that are in good order; they just need to be committed. I'd be ever appreciative if someone would do the honors :) https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213353 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213586 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213602 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213603 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213604 -- Bradley T. Hughes bradleythug...@fastmail.fm ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Portmaster still be dissin' jive,bros
The technical issue persists that I can not update via portmaster because I installed misc/jive out of sheer curiosity over its unprecedented MOVED message. The abort sometimes happens before and sometimes after the first set of error messages relating to emulators/linux_base-c6 make problems (svn now skips that path as it "remains in conflict"). -=-=- The World Trade Center towers MUST rise again, at least as tall as before...or terror has triumphed. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: FreeBSD Port: MailScanner-4.85.2
Hi! > Thank you for maintaining! > I'm wondering if there are any plans to update mailscanner to 4.86.1-1 or v5. If you submit a patch via bugs.freebsd.org, that would be very helpful. -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 4 years to go ! ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
FreeBSD Port: MailScanner-4.85.2
Hi, Thank you for maintaining! I’m wondering if there are any plans to update mailscanner to 4.86.1-1 or v5. Best, Ruud ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: lighttpd does not pull OpenSSL dependency
On 10/24/16 16:28, David Demelier wrote: > 2016-10-24 14:59 GMT+02:00 Guido Falsi: >> Are you generating your own packages? What software are you using to do >> that? > > Yes, I'm using poudriere. However I didn't upgrade poudriere for a > while, maybe I should upgrade it too. The bulk build was clean at time > I ran it, since it was an upgrade no packages were existing. It culd be related. It's at least worth a try. > >> Are you using some directive to enable ports provided ssl library? > > If you mean some tunables in the make.conf files, no. > >> So I'd conclude there's something wrong affecting your builds. What >> about a stray installation of a ports provided ssl library somewhere? > > I'm not sure to understand your question. The bulk build was clean (no > package existing), I'll double check this evening if removing the > lighttpd package to force a rebuild will fix that. > I see but for some reason the port, while building, picked up a ports provided openssl library, it had to be there somehow for the port to pick that up. I have no idea how it could be there though. -- Guido Falsi ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Inconsistency? (was Re: misc/jive deleted)
On 10/23/2016 19:10, Kurt Jaeger wrote: In a mail thread about jive that finding is very mature 8-} Speaking of maturity and attempting to add consistency, can anyone in this thread explain why misc/jive is considered offensive and removed, but the FreeBSD daemon logo (on the main web page) is left there ... even though there are numerous searchable stories about that image being offensive to some religious people? Thank you for your cogent reply. :) -- Dave Hayes - Consultant - Altadena CA, USA - d...@jetcafe.org *The opinions expressed above are entirely my own* Enjoyment is not a goal, it is a feeling that accompanies important ongoing activity ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
www/redmine port status
Hi, I've been used the www/redmine port for years. Each time there is an upgrade, the port is broken. I've sent many patches at each upgrade to fix various issues. For example, the revision 351940 has fixed the folder permissions and some errors in the Gemfile. I've upgraded to the last version in 2016Q4 and: - permissions are wrong again (set to root:wheel) - the redmine rc script can not start because it uses an nonexistent user I encourage people to not use this port until the maintainers start testing the port before committing. I know there are several ways to start redmine, but please do not forget that the rc script is here for reasons and therefore, should work by starting 'service redmine start' with some small user configuration. At least with thin option enabled, the redmine user must be created (or use www eventually) and set the appropriate folder to that one as specified in the redmine guide [0] Kind regards, Keep up the good work anyway ;) [0]: http://www.redmine.org/projects/redmine/wiki/RedmineInstall#Step-8-File-system-permissions -- David Demelier ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: misc/jive deleted
On 24/10/2016 17:11, Mikhail T. wrote: > Now that we are done with the hairsplitting, and I shall put the port > back as soon as I have a moment -- unless someone else beats me to it. > > I'd also like to ask portmgr@ to avoid taking such steps in the future > -- inventing a policy in order to immediately act on it. Though we do > not have a strict separation of powers, portmgr@ is primarily an > executive body -- and should defer "lawmaking" to the wider audience of > committers, however cantankerous we may be. > > Portmgr's mandate is to ensure, ports continue to build smoothly despite > changes to the OS and other ports. Policing the contents is a > regrettable overreach (a.k.a. "powergrab"). Hi, Mikhail and everyone else involved here, The misc/jive port was actually removed at the request of core@. Please can you raise your concerns with core privately, rather than letting this thread get out of hand (as it seems likely to do) in public. Cheers, Matthew, with hat core-secretary. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: 398 out of 1025 ports failed because of llvm37 compilation error
On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 05:44:39PM +, Grzegorz Junka wrote: > > On 22/10/2016 16:04, Grzegorz Junka wrote: > > How to fix it? > > > > [00:52:02] >> [02][00:42:43] Finished build of devel/llvm37: > > Failed: build > > > > Exception occurred: > > File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sphinx/environment.py", > > line 1261, in get_doctree > > doctree = pickle.load(f) > > EOFError > > The full traceback has been saved in /tmp/sphinx-err-naeTZg.log, if > > you want to report the issue to the developers. > > Disabling the documentation helped which probably means something is > wrong in that part of the port. There's a known, hard to reproduce, race condition in sphinx. Trying again generally works. :( -- Brooks ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: misc/jive deleted
On 24.10.2016 11:51, Mark Linimon wrote: Or: - expired, replaced by newer version - unfetchable - license does not allow anyone to package it - author requested(*) removal I have personally removed ports fitting each of these criteria at various times. I am sure I am missing some other criterion as well. So, your claim is simply false. I stand corrected and apologize. Allow me to rephrase my argument: Technically, the only reasons to remove a port is due to one of the following reasons: * continuous failure to build * expiration, replaced by newer version * unfetchable * license does not allow anyone to package it * author requested(*) removal None of the above is applicable to jive. Therefore, for purely technical reasons, it ought to be put back. I have personally removed ports fitting each of these criteria at various times. I am sure I am missing some other criterion as well. Yes, I'm sure you could, eventually, think of others -- but, just as with the above list, none that would apply to jive. It is -- to my knowledge and yours, evidently -- the very first one removed for a patently non-technical reason of being "offensive". Now that we are done with the hairsplitting, and I shall put the port back as soon as I have a moment -- unless someone else beats me to it. I'd also like to ask portmgr@ to avoid taking such steps in the future -- inventing a policy in order to immediately act on it. Though we do not have a strict separation of powers, portmgr@ is primarily an executive body -- and should defer "lawmaking" to the wider audience of committers, however cantankerous we may be. Portmgr's mandate is to ensure, ports continue to build smoothly despite changes to the OS and other ports. Policing the contents is a regrettable overreach (a.k.a. "powergrab"). -mi ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: misc/jive deleted
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 03:56:07PM -0400, Mikhail T. wrote: > Technically, the only reason to remove a port is due to a failure to > build -- and that hasn't happened. Or: - expired, replaced by newer version - unfetchable - license does not allow anyone to package it - author requested(*) removal I have personally removed ports fitting each of these criteria at various times. I am sure I am missing some other criterion as well. So, your claim is simply false. mcl (*) ok, in one case, it was actually a demand, with the threat of legal action appended. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Deluge error
Hi! > I upgraded libtorrent-rasterbar and py27-libtorrent-rasterbar and deluge > no longer starts. The error output is: Please compare with the reports in https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212235 I think there's an issue somewhere, but I had no time to dig into this. -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 4 years to go ! ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: misc/jive deleted
On Sun, 23 Oct 2016 01:59:17 +1100 (EST) Dave Horsfallwrote: > Next thing you know, "valgirl" will be deleted from Usenet... Let's not forget about Corporate Bullshit Generator! http://cbsg.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/live Those poor C-suites must feel offended by such mockery! Not in freebsd ports, I know. But why stop there? -- Before enlightenment - chop wood, draw water. After enlightenment - chop wood, draw water. Marko Cupać https://www.mimar.rs/ ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Deluge error
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 08:44:31AM -0400, Frank Seltzer wrote: > I upgraded libtorrent-rasterbar and py27-libtorrent-rasterbar and deluge > no longer starts. The error output is: > > [ERROR ] 08:40:04 main:245 > /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/libtorrent.so: Undefined symbol > "_ZNK10libtorrent14announce_entry12can_announceEN5boost6chrono10time_pointINS2_12steady_clockENS2_8durationIlNS1_5ratioILl1ELl10EEEb" > Traceback (most recent call last): >File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/deluge/main.py", line 238, > in start_daemon > Daemon(options, args) >File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/deluge/core/daemon.py", > line 141, in __init__ > from deluge.core.core import Core >File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/deluge/core/core.py", line > 36, in > from deluge._libtorrent import lt >File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/deluge/_libtorrent.py", > line 59, in > import libtorrent as lt > ImportError: /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/libtorrent.so: > Undefined symbol > "_ZNK10libtorrent14announce_entry12can_announceEN5boost6chrono10time_pointINS2_12steady_clockENS2_8durationIlNS1_5ratioILl1ELl10EEEb" > > Have I fat-fingered something or is this a known problem? I have getting some of these in libxul since FreeBSD 11 came out. > ___ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" -- Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca God,Queen and country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! http://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism Time for the USA to hold a referendum on its republic and vote to dissolve!! ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: lighttpd does not pull OpenSSL dependency
2016-10-24 14:59 GMT+02:00 Guido Falsi: > Are you generating your own packages? What software are you using to do > that? Yes, I'm using poudriere. However I didn't upgrade poudriere for a while, maybe I should upgrade it too. The bulk build was clean at time I ran it, since it was an upgrade no packages were existing. > Are you using some directive to enable ports provided ssl library? If you mean some tunables in the make.conf files, no. > So I'd conclude there's something wrong affecting your builds. What > about a stray installation of a ports provided ssl library somewhere? I'm not sure to understand your question. The bulk build was clean (no package existing), I'll double check this evening if removing the lighttpd package to force a rebuild will fix that. -- Demelier David ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: lighttpd does not pull OpenSSL dependency
This might be due to you had port installed already and it got picked up first On Oct 24, 2016 7:59 AM, "Guido Falsi"wrote: > On 10/24/16 13:15, David Demelier wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Upgraded my system to 11.0-RELEASE-p1 and using 2016Q4 branch, I have a > > small issue regarding lighttpd dependency. > > > > The binary is linked against the OpenSSL port, but it is not listed as a > > dependency: > > > > /usr/local/sbin/lighttpd: > > libpcre.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libpcre.so.1 (0x800854000) > > libssl.so.8 => /usr/local/lib/libssl.so.8 (0x800acc000) > > libcrypto.so.8 => /usr/local/lib/libcrypto.so.8 (0x800d3f000) > > libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x80114c000) > > libthr.so.3 => /lib/libthr.so.3 (0x80150) > > > [...] > > > > What can I do to fix that? > > Are you generating your own packages? What software are you using to do > that? > > Are you using some directive to enable ports provided ssl library? > > A machine using my own generated packages using poudriere does not show > such behavior using ports trunk: > > /usr/local/sbin/lighttpd: > libpcre.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libpcre.so.1 (0x800857000) > libssl.so.8 => /usr/lib/libssl.so.8 (0x800acf000) > libcrypto.so.8 => /lib/libcrypto.so.8 (0x800e0) > libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x80126d000) > libthr.so.3 => /lib/libthr.so.3 (0x80160d000) > > A VM I have using official packages from 2016Q4 also gives the same > output(apart from the offsets which are slightly different) when > checking a just downloaded lighttpd package. > > So I'd conclude there's something wrong affecting your builds. What > about a stray installation of a ports provided ssl library somewhere? > > More information will be needed to really help you. > > -- > Guido Falsi > ___ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" > ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: lighttpd does not pull OpenSSL dependency
On 10/24/16 13:15, David Demelier wrote: > Hello, > > Upgraded my system to 11.0-RELEASE-p1 and using 2016Q4 branch, I have a > small issue regarding lighttpd dependency. > > The binary is linked against the OpenSSL port, but it is not listed as a > dependency: > > /usr/local/sbin/lighttpd: > libpcre.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libpcre.so.1 (0x800854000) > libssl.so.8 => /usr/local/lib/libssl.so.8 (0x800acc000) > libcrypto.so.8 => /usr/local/lib/libcrypto.so.8 (0x800d3f000) > libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x80114c000) > libthr.so.3 => /lib/libthr.so.3 (0x80150) > [...] > > What can I do to fix that? Are you generating your own packages? What software are you using to do that? Are you using some directive to enable ports provided ssl library? A machine using my own generated packages using poudriere does not show such behavior using ports trunk: /usr/local/sbin/lighttpd: libpcre.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libpcre.so.1 (0x800857000) libssl.so.8 => /usr/lib/libssl.so.8 (0x800acf000) libcrypto.so.8 => /lib/libcrypto.so.8 (0x800e0) libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x80126d000) libthr.so.3 => /lib/libthr.so.3 (0x80160d000) A VM I have using official packages from 2016Q4 also gives the same output(apart from the offsets which are slightly different) when checking a just downloaded lighttpd package. So I'd conclude there's something wrong affecting your builds. What about a stray installation of a ports provided ssl library somewhere? More information will be needed to really help you. -- Guido Falsi___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Deluge error
On Mon, 24 Oct 2016, Frank Seltzer wrote: I upgraded libtorrent-rasterbar and py27-libtorrent-rasterbar and deluge no longer starts. The error output is: [ERROR ] 08:40:04 main:245 /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/libtorrent.so: Undefined symbol "_ZNK10libtorrent14announce_entry12can_announceEN5boost6chrono10time_pointINS2_12steady_clockENS2_8durationIlNS1_5ratioILl1ELl10EEEb" Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/deluge/main.py", line 238, in start_daemon Daemon(options, args) File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/deluge/core/daemon.py", line 141, in __init__ from deluge.core.core import Core File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/deluge/core/core.py", line 36, in from deluge._libtorrent import lt File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/deluge/_libtorrent.py", line 59, in import libtorrent as lt ImportError: /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/libtorrent.so: Undefined symbol "_ZNK10libtorrent14announce_entry12can_announceEN5boost6chrono10time_pointINS2_12steady_clockENS2_8durationIlNS1_5ratioILl1ELl10EEEb" Have I fat-fingered something or is this a known problem? I forgot to mention that I have rebuilt python27, py27\* and deluge. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Deluge error
I upgraded libtorrent-rasterbar and py27-libtorrent-rasterbar and deluge no longer starts. The error output is: [ERROR ] 08:40:04 main:245 /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/libtorrent.so: Undefined symbol "_ZNK10libtorrent14announce_entry12can_announceEN5boost6chrono10time_pointINS2_12steady_clockENS2_8durationIlNS1_5ratioILl1ELl10EEEb" Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/deluge/main.py", line 238, in start_daemon Daemon(options, args) File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/deluge/core/daemon.py", line 141, in __init__ from deluge.core.core import Core File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/deluge/core/core.py", line 36, in from deluge._libtorrent import lt File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/deluge/_libtorrent.py", line 59, in import libtorrent as lt ImportError: /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/libtorrent.so: Undefined symbol "_ZNK10libtorrent14announce_entry12can_announceEN5boost6chrono10time_pointINS2_12steady_clockENS2_8durationIlNS1_5ratioILl1ELl10EEEb" Have I fat-fingered something or is this a known problem? ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
lighttpd does not pull OpenSSL dependency
Hello, Upgraded my system to 11.0-RELEASE-p1 and using 2016Q4 branch, I have a small issue regarding lighttpd dependency. The binary is linked against the OpenSSL port, but it is not listed as a dependency: /usr/local/sbin/lighttpd: libpcre.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libpcre.so.1 (0x800854000) libssl.so.8 => /usr/local/lib/libssl.so.8 (0x800acc000) libcrypto.so.8 => /usr/local/lib/libcrypto.so.8 (0x800d3f000) libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x80114c000) libthr.so.3 => /lib/libthr.so.3 (0x80150) The OpenSSL option is activated as well : pkg info lighttpd : lighttpd-1.4.41_1 Name : lighttpd Version: 1.4.41_1 Installed on : Mon Oct 24 12:52:45 2016 CEST Origin : www/lighttpd Architecture : freebsd:11:x86:64 Prefix : /usr/local Categories : www Licenses : BSD3CLAUSE Maintainer : pku...@anongoth.pl WWW: http://www.lighttpd.net/ Comment: Secure, fast, compliant, and flexible Web Server Options: ATTR : off BZIP2 : on DOCS : on FAM: off GDBM : off IPV6 : on LDAP : off LIBEV : off LUA: off MEMCACHED : off MYSQL : off MYSQLAUTH : off OPENSSL: on SPAWNFCGI : off VALGRIND : off WEBDAV : off Shared Libs required: libpcre.so.1 Annotations: cpe: cpe:2.3:a:lighttpd:lighttpd:1.4.41:freebsd11:x64:1 repo_type : binary repository : server What can I do to fix that? Thanks! -- David Demelier ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Advise requested when a repo split occurs
Ultima wrote on 2016/10/22 21:14: Hello, Some what recently a couple of the ports I maintain split into two, one being -server, and the other being -client. The code was more or less cloned then removed some make args/files that one would be used to enable both. Currently the code is so similar it would be possible to create a slave port and use the same patches, makefile and plist with minimal changes, however I have no idea the direction this split may go and this maybe short lived. So onto my topic for this post. Would it be better to create a new port with mostly duplicate code and remove/add the little changes required? Or as previously stated make a slave port and use the common code. I am struggling to decide on this and would appreciate opinions. I think it is fine to use slave port first. See some databases like MySQL or PostgreSQL. When server and client will diverge too much in the future, you can rework it as too separate ports. Miroslav Lachman ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date
Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/po...@freebsd.org.html Port| Current version | New version +-+ www/py-beaker | 1.8.0 | 1.8.1 +-+ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Vulnerabilities not included into FreeBSD vuxml
Hello, everyone! I've found some vulnerabilities that are not included into freebsd vuxml (or how this service is called?) MySQL - http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2016-2881722.html#AppendixMSQL VirtualBox - http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2016-2881722.html#AppendixOVIR ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Jive prejudices
On 2016-10-24 07:33, Horatiu Moldovan wrote: Maybe off-topic, but I can't help wondering if we're close to the point when a port should be removed because someone finds a variable/type name "offensive". Am I being paranoid? Let's wait and see. I was just wondering the same. In which case, we must remove security/sudo from the tree because it contains racial slurs. Yea, it's optional (INSULTS), but hey, so is installing any ports. (btw, if it isn't clear, I am _NOT_ complaining about sudo. don't you dare remove insults, that's its best feature! The "racial" ones can be patched out with INSULTS_CONFIGURE_ON+= --with-pc-insults, if anyone really WAS thinking about bringing a banhammer to that option...) -- Vlad K. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: misc/jive deleted
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 09:54:56AM +0200, Torsten Zuehlsdorff wrote: > On 24.10.2016 09:16, Greg Byshenk wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 01:05:52AM +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > > > >> "Common decency" is disputable even in within USA; Europe is less > >> infested with USA style prissy "political correctness", & other > >> places less than Europe. Censorship of Global FreeBSD to USA norms > >> is Offensive. > > > > Point of information: I can't speak knowledgeably about the > > rest of the world, but Europe tends to have -more- stringent > > restrictions on abusive speech than does the USA. > > Just at a side note - this statement is far to general. It depends very > heavenly on the country. There are around 50 different countries in > Europe which differs quite a lot - some have more restrictions and some > less than the USA. Its quite surprising. Yes, it is overly general, but it was in response to an equally overly-general statement. To my knowledge, it also is -generally- (though not univerally) true. (And, of course, the nature of such restrictions is highly variable from one state to another.) -- greg byshenk - gbysh...@byshenk.net - Leiden, NL ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: misc/jive deleted
On 24.10.2016 09:16, Greg Byshenk wrote: On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 01:05:52AM +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote: Mark Linimon wrote: It's not delusions of moral superiority. It's common decency. "Common decency" is disputable even in within USA; Europe is less infested with USA style prissy "political correctness", & other places less than Europe. Censorship of Global FreeBSD to USA norms is Offensive. Point of information: I can't speak knowledgeably about the rest of the world, but Europe tends to have -more- stringent restrictions on abusive speech than does the USA. Just at a side note - this statement is far to general. It depends very heavenly on the country. There are around 50 different countries in Europe which differs quite a lot - some have more restrictions and some less than the USA. Its quite surprising. Greetings, Torsten ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: misc/jive deleted
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 01:05:52AM +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > Mark Linimon wrote: > > It's not delusions of moral superiority. It's common decency. > "Common decency" is disputable even in within USA; Europe is less > infested with USA style prissy "political correctness", & other > places less than Europe. Censorship of Global FreeBSD to USA norms > is Offensive. Point of information: I can't speak knowledgeably about the rest of the world, but Europe tends to have -more- stringent restrictions on abusive speech than does the USA. -- greg byshenk - gbysh...@byshenk.net - Leiden, NL ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"