FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date

2017-01-14 Thread portscout
Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated,

Re: inkscape broken on 12-current amd64

2017-01-14 Thread Kevin Oberman
On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 1:43 PM, Nilton Jose Rizzo wrote: > Em Sat, 14 Jan 2017 19:29:18 +0100, Fernando Herrero Carrón escreveu > > 2017-01-14 19:00 GMT+01:00 Nilton Jose Rizzo : > > > > > > > > My Box: > > > > > >

Re: ATI, libdrm, gnome

2017-01-14 Thread Stari Karp
On Sat, 2017-01-14 at 22:45 +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 04:37:04PM -0500, Stari Karp wrote: > > > > Hi! > > > > Today I update xf86-video-ati-7.8 and also libdrm 2.4.7,1. I am > > using > > Synth on FreeBSD 11-RELEASE (amd64) and everything was okay except > >

Re: Does building linux packages under poudriere require linux compatibility emulation?

2017-01-14 Thread Mark Martinec
Thanks to all who responded, makes perfect sense now. Paul Mather wrote: The only thing you need on the host is to have the linux kernel module loaded. (You don't need to have any Linux packages installed there.) The default setting in /usr/local/etc/poudriere.conf is to have NOLINUX=yes

ATI, libdrm, gnome

2017-01-14 Thread Stari Karp
Hi! Today I update xf86-video-ati-7.8 and also libdrm 2.4.7,1. I am using Synth on FreeBSD 11-RELEASE (amd64) and everything was okay except thyat GNOME3 doesn't start anymore. It stopped o with black screen and mouse curson. I did try Lumina desktop too with the same result but Fluxbox works.

Re: ATI, libdrm, gnome

2017-01-14 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 05:35:24PM -0500, Stari Karp wrote: > On Sat, 2017-01-14 at 22:45 +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 04:37:04PM -0500, Stari Karp wrote: > > > > > > Hi! > > > > > > Today I update xf86-video-ati-7.8 and also libdrm 2.4.7,1. I am > > > using > > >

Re: Does building linux packages under poudriere require linux compatibility emulation?

2017-01-14 Thread Timon
On 14/01/2017 03:07, Mark Martinec wrote: Does building such packages really require linuxilator configured on the build host ??? No, it doesn't require linuxulator to be configured, but require linux.ko (and linux64.ko if your host is amd64) to be loaded. Poudriere load linux.ko, but

Re: flash plugin / nsplugin wrapper

2017-01-14 Thread The Doctor
On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 07:47:07PM +0100, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > On Sat, 14 Jan 2017 10:56:41 -0700 The Doctor > wrote: > > Hello. > > > > consistency please. > > > > Can these plugin have the option of Centos 6 OR centos 7 install;. > > > > I need Centos 7 for Xen

Cairo dock Plugins broken on 12-current

2017-01-14 Thread Nilton Jose Rizzo
Hi All, I reinstalling my box, from a fresh, clean new instalation. My -current was from 10-current without many problems. But now, when I compile some ports with change default options, I have some problems. Now the Cairo-Dock-Plugins broken at: ===> cairo-dock-plugins-3.4.1_4

Re: ATI, libdrm, gnome

2017-01-14 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 04:37:04PM -0500, Stari Karp wrote: > Hi! > > Today I update xf86-video-ati-7.8 and also libdrm 2.4.7,1. I am using > Synth on FreeBSD 11-RELEASE (amd64) and everything was okay except > thyat GNOME3 doesn't start anymore. It stopped o with black screen and > mouse curson.

Re: inkscape broken on 12-current amd64

2017-01-14 Thread Nilton Jose Rizzo
Em Sat, 14 Jan 2017 19:29:18 +0100, Fernando Herrero Carrón escreveu > 2017-01-14 19:00 GMT+01:00 Nilton Jose Rizzo : > > > > > My Box: > > > > root@valfenda:/usr/ports/graphics/inkscape # uname -a > > FreeBSD valfenda 12.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 12.0-CURRENT #0 r312006: Fri Jan 13

Re: [ports/security/openssh-portable] Fix SCTP patch

2017-01-14 Thread Eduardo Morras via freebsd-ports
On Fri, 13 Jan 2017 13:43:50 -0800 wrote: > > My point is that it might be a good idea to commit SCTP support > into base system's openssh. Then we(I) won't need the port at all. > The protocol first appeared in FreeBSD, yet there is not a single > program that uses it. This

Re: Does building linux packages under poudriere require linux compatibility emulation?

2017-01-14 Thread Tijl Coosemans
On Sat, 14 Jan 2017 15:11:42 +0100 Tijl Coosemans wrote: > On Sat, 14 Jan 2017 01:07:09 +0100 Mark Martinec > wrote: >> When building packages under poudriere on 11.0-RELEASE-p7 (from a >> command line in a terminal window) I'm noticing

Re: flash plugin / nsplugin wrapper

2017-01-14 Thread Tijl Coosemans
On Sat, 14 Jan 2017 10:56:41 -0700 The Doctor wrote: > Hello. > > consistency please. > > Can these plugin have the option of Centos 6 OR centos 7 install;. > > I need Centos 7 for Xen / bhyve virtualisation. Add DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=linux=c7 or c7_64 to /etc/make.conf

Re: inkscape broken on 12-current amd64

2017-01-14 Thread Fernando Herrero Carrón
2017-01-14 19:00 GMT+01:00 Nilton Jose Rizzo : > > My Box: > > root@valfenda:/usr/ports/graphics/inkscape # uname -a > FreeBSD valfenda 12.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 12.0-CURRENT #0 r312006: Fri Jan 13 > 01:24:31 BRST 2017 root@valfenda:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/VALFENDA amd64 >

flash plugin / nsplugin wrapper

2017-01-14 Thread The Doctor
Hello. consistency please. Can these plugin have the option of Centos 6 OR centos 7 install;. I need Centos 7 for Xen / bhyve virtualisation. -- Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca God,Queen and country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware

inkscape broken on 12-current amd64

2017-01-14 Thread Nilton Jose Rizzo
My Box: root@valfenda:/usr/ports/graphics/inkscape # uname -a FreeBSD valfenda 12.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 12.0-CURRENT #0 r312006: Fri Jan 13 01:24:31 BRST 2017 root@valfenda:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/VALFENDA amd64 root@valfenda:/usr/ports/graphics/inkscape # svnlite info /usr/ports Path:

Re: suggested patch for bsd.ports.mk

2017-01-14 Thread Julian Elischer
On 4/01/2017 4:05 AM, Kurt Jaeger wrote: Hi! I got several "yes please" from members of the public, but no actionable response from members of the ports group So I am asking again. I'd also like to have this patch. If I look at the PR, mat is already working to integrate it. yes though

чтобы ВСЕ были довольны...

2017-01-14 Thread Admin Admin
, . ID: R118 http://vstok25.ru/index.php/campaigns/ro068z9e9g45a/track-url/pl615rme93aee/4d77fd6dc065567b029731fdee8efb5fd608ea80 C ,! - ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: openldap-client vs openldap-sasl-client

2017-01-14 Thread Julian Elischer
On 5/01/2017 6:44 PM, Julian Elischer wrote: On 5/01/2017 6:30 PM, Jan Bramkamp wrote: On 04/01/2017 18:32, Andriy Gapon wrote: Do you I understand correctly that it is impossible now to install both samba44 and libreoffice using the official FreeBSD package repository? Or samba44 and KDE?

Re: Does building linux packages under poudriere require linux compatibility emulation?

2017-01-14 Thread Paul Mather
On Jan 14, 2017, at 9:11 AM, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > On Sat, 14 Jan 2017 01:07:09 +0100 Mark Martinec > wrote: >> When building packages under poudriere on 11.0-RELEASE-p7 (from a >> command line in a terminal window) I'm noticing occasional

Re: Does building linux packages under poudriere require linux compatibility emulation?

2017-01-14 Thread Tijl Coosemans
On Sat, 14 Jan 2017 01:07:09 +0100 Mark Martinec wrote: > When building packages under poudriere on 11.0-RELEASE-p7 (from a > command line in a terminal window) I'm noticing occasional streams of > diagnostic: > >ELF binary type "3" not known. > > which seem

Re: Poudriere package builds for 101amd64-default have not run since 1-Jan-2017

2017-01-14 Thread Simon Wright
On 14/01/2017 15:26, Mathieu Arnold wrote: Le 14/01/2017 à 05:57, Simon Wright a écrit : Hi all I sync my local ports tree to the same release as is used to build packages. Checking my logs and the logs on beefy6 which is/was the Has anything changed with the build system or are there issues?

Re: Does building linux packages under poudriere require linux compatibility emulation?

2017-01-14 Thread Brandon Allbery
On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 9:38 AM, Konstantin Tokarev wrote: > 14.01.2017, 12:18, "René Ladan" : > > Op 14 jan. 2017 01:07 schreef "Mark Martinec" < > mark.martinec+free...@ijs.si > >> : > > When building packages under poudriere on 11.0-RELEASE-p7 (from a

Re: Does building linux packages under poudriere require linux compatibility emulation?

2017-01-14 Thread Konstantin Tokarev
14.01.2017, 12:18, "René Ladan" : > Op 14 jan. 2017 01:07 schreef "Mark Martinec" > : > > When building packages under poudriere on 11.0-RELEASE-p7 (from a command > line in a terminal window) I'm noticing occasional streams of diagnostic: > >  

Re: Does building linux packages under poudriere require linux compatibility emulation?

2017-01-14 Thread René Ladan
Op 14 jan. 2017 01:07 schreef "Mark Martinec" : When building packages under poudriere on 11.0-RELEASE-p7 (from a command line in a terminal window) I'm noticing occasional streams of diagnostic: ELF binary type "3" not known. which seem to be related to