On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 7:02 PM, George Mitchell
wrote:
> On 04/14/17 08:37, Thomas Steen Rasmussen wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Cloudflare deployed a bunch (74 apparently) of new f-root dns
> > servers, which do not permit AXFR like the other f-root instances
> > do.
> >
On 04/14/17 08:37, Thomas Steen Rasmussen wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Cloudflare deployed a bunch (74 apparently) of new f-root dns
> servers, which do not permit AXFR like the other f-root instances
> do.
> [...]
> A good alternative could be to change named.conf to use
> lax.xfr.dns.icann.org and
On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 3:09 PM, Peter Smith wrote:
> I am running
>
> # uname -a
> > FreeBSD red 11.0-RELEASE-p8 FreeBSD 11.0-RELEASE-p8 #0: Wed Feb 22
> > 06:12:04 UTC 2017 r...@amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/
> src/sys/GENERIC
> > amd64
> >
>
>
> Having
I am running
# uname -a
> FreeBSD red 11.0-RELEASE-p8 FreeBSD 11.0-RELEASE-p8 #0: Wed Feb 22
> 06:12:04 UTC 2017
> r...@amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC
> amd64
>
Having just refreshed my ports tree (portsnap fetch, etc), I'm rebuilding
all my installed ports
On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 04:42:35PM +0200, Michael Gmelin wrote:
> > On 14. Apr 2017, at 16:22, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 12:06:42PM +0200, Michael Gmelin wrote:
> >>> On 12. Apr 2017, at 11:37, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> >>> ...
>
On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 05:25:21PM +0200, Thomas Steen Rasmussen wrote:
> On 04/14/2017 04:51 PM, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm busy right now, could you open a PR so that I don't loose and forget
> > this ?
>
> Sure thing, https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218656
>
>
Sorry Matthew, forgot to reply to this one.
On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 07:01:35PM +0200, Matthew Rezny wrote:
> On Wednesday 05 April 2017 16:15:41 Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > ...
> > Hmm, I don't quite get it: shouldn't static linking actually increase
> > the binaries (and thus the package) size?
On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 08:27:29PM -0700, Mark Millard wrote:
> I've seen material quoted from a exp-run that reported
> that about 54(?) ports were then blocked by lang/gcc6-aux
> not building.
Although the first is an older run (the last complete run IIUC), there
were 50 and 51 respectively as
Thanks Anton,
The compilation was broken because of
OPTIONS_FILE_SET+=RELRO
in
devel/binutils
After disabling RELRO net/openmpi can be compiled successfully. Not sure
if this is a bug or expected behaviour.
Regards
Grzegorz
On 14/04/2017 11:26, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
I don't know
Dear port maintainer,
The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your
ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check
each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate,
submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated,
Rainer Hurling skrev:
>
> Am 15.04.2017 um 01:04 schrieb Kevin Oberman:
>> Thanks for the work on opencv, but PLEASE put something in UPDATING when
>> you make changes that impact large numbers of ports. I see opencv2 as
>> orphaned, so I can't stay there.
>>
>> Do I reset the origin of opencv2
Am 15.04.2017 um 01:04 schrieb Kevin Oberman:
> Thanks for the work on opencv, but PLEASE put something in UPDATING when
> you make changes that impact large numbers of ports. I see opencv2 as
> orphaned, so I can't stay there.
>
> Do I reset the origin of opencv2 to opencv? Or will I need to
12 matches
Mail list logo